|
Tournoi du 07-12-14
uae
1 63,28 A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie
2 60,22 B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric
3 60,12 A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike
4 59,96 A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean
5 58,77 B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques
6 58,06 a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges
7 57,64 A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel
8 56,84 a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain
9 56,67 B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry
10 55,02 A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi
11 54,39 a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam
12 53,65 a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge
13 52,66 B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
14 52,01 B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique
15 51,34 B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna
16 50,81 A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique
17 50,50 B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick
18 50,49 B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine
19 50,01 a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain
20 49,51 B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges
21 49,39 a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella
22 48,81 a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia
23 48,57 B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry
24 46,86 a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank
25 46,26 B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc
26 45,48 A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine
27 45,12 a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel
28 44,09 B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane
~ 44,09 B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
30 43,55 A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel
31 43,49 a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana
32 41,92 A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe
33 40,68 A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme
34 39,65 a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella
35 36,17 A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette
36 34,83 B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo
PAIRE Nr : A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 26 76.47
2 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 11.76
3 NS 5P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 17.65
5 NS 4P S+1 650 31 91.18
6 NS 4T N = 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 22 64.71
8 NS 2KcE-2 300 34 100.00
9 NS 5P E+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,57 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %10 NS 3S W = -600 3 8.82
11 NS 4C S+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %13 NS 2C N = 110 26 76.47
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 17 50.00
15 NS 5K W-2 100 19 55.88 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %16 NS 3K N = 110 22 64.71
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 17.65
18 NS 6T N = 1370 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %19 NS 3PcN-2 -300 18 52.94
20 NS 5CcW-3 800 34 100.00
21 NS 4PcE-2 300 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 81,37 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 11.76
23 NS 5K S = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 28,43 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %25 NS 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 6.4 18.82
27 NS 1S S = 90 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 42,55 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %28 NS 4C W = -420 4 11.76
29 NS 2K E+3 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 3K E-1 50 14.9 43.82 µ Tbl = 34,22 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %31 NS 1S N = 90 20 58.82
32 NS 4C E-1 100 29 85.29
33 NS 3S S = 400 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
Total : 617,3 / 1122 = 55,02 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 % 1 NS 3P S+2 200 7 20.59
2 NS 2K S+1 110 29 85.29
3 NS 5CcE-1 200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 % 4 NS 2K E+1 -110 20 58.82
5 NS 4P S = 620 21 61.76
6 NS 2K W+1 -110 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 13 38.24
8 NS 1S E-2 100 29 85.29
9 NS 6KcS-4 -800 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %10 NS 2K E+1 -110 27 79.41
11 NS 4C S+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 1S E-1 50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 81,37 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %13 NS 1S S = 90 17 50.00
14 NS 4C E-2 100 34 100.00
15 NS 4K W = -130 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %16 NS 4K N = 130 30 88.24
17 NS 2P S+2 170 20 58.82
18 NS 6S S-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 35.29
20 NS 5P E-3 300 27 79.41
21 NS 3P E-2 100 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %22 NS 3S W = -600 22 64.71
23 NS 5K N = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 3S W-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %25 NS 4P S = 420 27 79.41
26 NS 3PcS+3 1330 33.9 99.71
27 NS 2K W = -90 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 65,59 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 27 79.41
29 NS 5K E = -600 3 8.82
30 NS 3K E-3 150 33.9 99.71 µ Tbl = 62,65 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %31 NS 3T S-1 -100 5 14.71
32 NS 4C E-1 100 29 85.29
33 NS 2P S+1 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 672,8 / 1122 = 59,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 % 1 NS 4P S+2 480 34 100.00
2 NS 2K N = 90 20 58.82
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 % 4 NS 3K E-1 100 34 100.00
5 NS 2P S+1 140 8 23.53
6 NS 4K E-2 200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 71,57 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 % 7 NS 6S W-1 100 29 85.29
8 NS 1S W = -90 11 32.35
9 NS 5C W+1 -680 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %10 NS 2P W-1 100 32 94.12
11 NS 5C N = 450 24 70.59
12 NS 2S E = -120 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 8 23.53
14 NS 3C E+2 -200 8 23.53
15 NS 3C N = 140 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %16 NS 2K N+2 130 30 88.24
17 NS 4C S+1 450 31 91.18
18 NS 5T N = 600 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 81,37 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %19 NS 3PcN-1 -100 27 79.41
20 NS 4P E-3 300 27 79.41
21 NS 2P W = -110 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %22 NS 4C E = -620 16 47.06
23 NS 5K N+1 620 32 94.12
24 NS 3S W-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %25 NS 3C S+1 170 11 32.35
26 NS 4P N+2 680 29.7 87.35
27 NS 2S S+1 150 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %28 NS 4C E = -420 4 11.76
29 NS 4K E+1 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 4K E-2 100 22.3 65.59 µ Tbl = 41,47 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %31 NS 3K W-1 50 14 41.18
32 NS 4C E = -620 8 23.53
33 NS 3S N = 400 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
Total : 710,0 / 1122 = 63,28 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 % 1 NS 3P S+1 170 3 8.82
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 4 11.76
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 % 4 NS 2KxE+2 -1560 0 0.00
5 NS 4P S = 620 21 61.76
6 NS 4T S = 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 % 7 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
8 NS 1S E = -90 11 32.35
9 NS 4P E+3 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %10 NS 2K E+1 -110 27 79.41
11 NS 4C N = 420 7 20.59
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 11.76
14 NS 4C W-1 50 28 82.35
15 NS 2K E+2 -130 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 13 38.24
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 17.65
18 NS 6S N-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 11.76
20 NS 4C E-1 100 13 38.24
21 NS 2P E-1 50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
23 NS 5K N+1 620 32 94.12
24 NS 3S E = -400 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %25 NS 4P N = 420 27 79.41
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 6.4 18.82
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 44,51 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %28 NS 4PcN-1 -200 12 35.29
29 NS 3S E = -600 3 8.82
30 NS 1S N-1 -50 6.4 18.82 µ Tbl = 20,98 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %31 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 14.71
32 NS 4C E-2 200 34 100.00
33 NS 2S N+1 150 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
Total : 405,8 / 1122 = 36,17 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 % 1 NS 2P S = 110 0 0.00
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 4 11.76
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 21,57 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 % 4 NS 2K E+1 -110 20 58.82
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 11.76
6 NS 5KcW-2 500 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 % 7 NS 6C E = -1430 4 11.76
8 NS 1S W-2 100 29 85.29
9 NS 6P E = -1430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %10 NS 2K E+2 -130 20 58.82
11 NS 4C N+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %13 NS 1S S = 90 17 50.00
14 NS 2C E+2 -170 10 29.41
15 NS 4T E-2 100 19 55.88 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %16 NS 3K N = 110 22 64.71
17 NS 4P N = 420 26 76.47
18 NS 6P S-2 -200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 11.76
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
21 NS 2T W = -90 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 15,69 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 11.76
23 NS 5K N = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 4P W-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %25 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 11.76
26 NS 60%60% Ajust 20.4 60.00
27 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 25,88 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %28 NS 4C W = -420 4 11.76
29 NS 2T E+2 -130 26 76.47
30 NS 50%60% Ajust 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %31 NS 1S W = -90 12 35.29
32 NS 2C E+1 -140 19 55.88
33 NS 2T S+1 110 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
Total : 456,4 / 1122 = 40,68 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 26 76.47
2 NS 4T E-2 100 25 73.53
3 NS 5T S-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 26 76.47
5 NS 4P S = 620 21 61.76
6 NS 5T N-1 -50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 % 7 NS 6C E = -1430 4 11.76
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 8.82
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 8,82 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %10 NS 3T E+1 -130 20 58.82
11 NS 4C S+1 420 7 20.59
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %13 NS 2PcE-1 200 34 100.00
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
15 NS 3T E-1 50 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %16 NS 5T W-1 100 13 38.24
17 NS 2C N+1 140 14 41.18
18 NS 6S S-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %19 NS 1S W+3 -180 23 67.65
20 NS 5KcS-1 -200 7 20.59
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %22 NS 4C W = -620 16 47.06
23 NS 5K N+1 620 32 94.12
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %25 NS 4P N = 420 27 79.41
26 NS 3KcW = -670 0.1 0.29
27 NS 3S S = 400 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 58,92 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %28 NS 4PcN-1 -200 12 35.29
29 NS 3K E+2 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 3P S-2 -100 2.2 6.47 µ Tbl = 29,61 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %31 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 14.71
32 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 5.88
33 NS 3S S = 400 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
Total : 470,3 / 1122 = 41,92 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 26 76.47
2 NS 1S S = 90 20 58.82
3 NS 4CcE = -790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 % 4 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 29.41
5 NS 4P S+1 650 31 91.18
6 NS 3T S+1 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 % 7 NS 2PcS-2 -500 26 76.47
8 NS 2C N-1 -50 16 47.06
9 NS 5P E-1 100 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,51 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %10 NS 2P W-2 200 34 100.00
11 NS 4C S+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 2K E = -90 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 84,31 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 31 91.18
14 NS 4C E-1 50 28 82.35
15 NS 2C N+1 140 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 82,35 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %16 NS 3K N = 110 22 64.71
17 NS 4P S+2 480 34 100.00
18 NS 6T N-2 -200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12 35.29
20 NS 5KcS-1 -200 7 20.59
21 NS 2CxE-2 600 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %22 NS 2C W+1 -140 26 76.47
23 NS 5K S = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 3S W-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %25 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 11.76
26 NS 5KcW-1 200 11.7 34.41
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 27,16 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %28 NS 5C W-2 100 34 100.00
29 NS 2K E+3 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 3P S = 140 31.8 93.53 µ Tbl = 80,20 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %31 NS 1S S = 90 20 58.82
32 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 5.88
33 NS 1T S+2 110 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
Total : 674,5 / 1122 = 60,12 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 26 76.47
2 NS 3T E-3 150 34 100.00
3 NS 5PcN-3 -500 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 6 17.65
5 NS 4P S = 620 21 61.76
6 NS 4T N = 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 % 7 NS 7S W-2 200 33 97.06
8 NS 1S W-1 50 22 64.71
9 NS 5P E+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %10 NS 4K W+1 -150 11 32.35
11 NS 3C S+2 200 2 5.88
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,75 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %13 NS 4K S-3 -300 1 2.94
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 17 50.00
15 NS 4K E-1 50 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %16 NS 4P W-1 100 13 38.24
17 NS 3P S+1 170 20 58.82
18 NS 6T N-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %19 NS 4PcS-2 -300 18 52.94
20 NS 4C W-2 200 20 58.82
21 NS 3P W = -140 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %22 NS 4C W = -620 16 47.06
23 NS 3K S+2 150 3 8.82
24 NS 3S E-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 34 100.00
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 6.4 18.82
27 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 41,57 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %28 NS 5C W-1 50 27 79.41
29 NS 3S E-2 200 34 100.00
30 NS 3K E-1 50 14.9 43.82 µ Tbl = 74,41 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %31 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 14.71
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 24 70.59
33 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
Total : 510,3 / 1122 = 45,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 26 76.47
2 NS 2T E = -90 9 26.47
3 NS 4PcN-1 -100 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 5.88
5 NS 4P S+1 650 31 91.18
6 NS 3K W = -110 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 13 38.24
8 NS 2K S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 4P E+3 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %10 NS 2K E+3 -150 11 32.35
11 NS 6K S-6 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 22,55 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %13 NS 1S S = 90 17 50.00
14 NS 4C W = -420 4 11.76
15 NS 3P E-3 150 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %16 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
17 NS 3C S = 140 14 41.18
18 NS 4P N = 620 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %19 NS 5TcE-3 800 34 100.00
20 NS 5T E-2 200 20 58.82
21 NS 2P E-1 50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %22 NS 3S W-1 100 31 91.18
23 NS 5T W-2 200 6 17.65
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %25 NS 4P N = 420 27 79.41
26 NS 4P N+1 650 25.5 75.00
27 NS 3S S = 400 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 83,82 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 %28 NS 4C E = -420 4 11.76
29 NS 3S E-1 100 31 91.18
30 NS 3PcS-2 -300 0.1 0.29 µ Tbl = 34,41 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %31 NS 3CcW-1 100 28 82.35
32 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 5.88
33 NS 3T S = 110 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
Total : 488,6 / 1122 = 43,55 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 % 1 NS 2P S+4 230 11 32.35
2 NS 2T E = -90 9 26.47
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 % 4 NS 2K E+1 -110 20 58.82
5 NS 2P S+3 200 12 35.29
6 NS 4T S = 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 % 7 NS 6C E = -1430 4 11.76
8 NS 1S E = -90 11 32.35
9 NS 6P E+1 -1460 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %10 NS 2K E+2 -130 20 58.82
11 NS 4C S+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %13 NS 3T N-3 -300 1 2.94
14 NS 3C E = -140 17 50.00
15 NS 3K W-1 50 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %16 NS 3K N+1 130 30 88.24
17 NS 4P S = 420 26 76.47
18 NS 6S S-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %19 NS 4PcS-2 -300 18 52.94
20 NS 5TcE-2 500 31 91.18
21 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 31 91.18
23 NS 5K S = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 3S E-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %25 NS 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 NS 5P N = 650 25.5 75.00
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 53,43 %
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 %28 NS 5C W-1 50 27 79.41
29 NS 5K E = -600 3 8.82
30 NS 2P S = 110 27.6 81.18 µ Tbl = 56,47 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 %31 NS 2T N+1 110 33 97.06
32 NS 4C W = -620 8 23.53
33 NS 3S N+1 430 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,53 %
Total : 570,1 / 1122 = 50,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel
a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana : 43,49 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 17 50.00
2 NS 2K S+1 110 29 85.29
3 NS 5CcE-1 200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain : 50,01 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 20 58.82
5 NS 2P S+3 200 12 35.29
6 NS 3K W = -110 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella : 49,39 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 22 64.71
8 NS 1S W = -90 11 32.35
9 NS 4P E+3 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam : 54,39 %10 NS 3CcS-1 -200 6 17.65
11 NS 4C N = 420 7 20.59
12 NS 3S E-1 50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel : 45,12 %13 NS 1S N = 90 17 50.00
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 17 50.00
15 NS 1S W-3 150 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges : 58,06 %16 NS 3T W = -110 5 14.71
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 17.65
18 NS 6T N = 1370 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank : 46,86 %19 NS 2S W+2 -180 23 67.65
20 NS 4CcW-2 500 31 91.18
21 NS 4PcE-1 100 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 74,51 %
a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge : 53,65 %22 NS 2C W+2 -170 24 70.59
23 NS 5K N = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 4P W-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia : 48,81 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 11.76
26 NS 4P N = 620 19.1 56.18
27 NS 2K W-1 50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 40,29 %
a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,84 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 27 79.41
29 NS 3K W+2 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 2P S = 110 27.6 81.18 µ Tbl = 69,22 %
a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella : 39,65 %31 NS 3T N = 110 33 97.06
32 NS 2S E = -120 22 64.71
33 NS 1P S+2 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
Total : 646,7 / 1122 = 57,64 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 BOLLACK Bogdan -DEVIGNE Alain
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 8 23.53
2 EO 3K S-1 -100 30 88.24
3 EO 5P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 % 4 EO 1S E+2 -150 24 70.59
5 EO 4P S+1 650 3 8.82
6 EO 3T S+1 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 21 61.76
8 EO 1S E-2 100 5 14.71
9 EO 6KcS-4 -800 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %10 EO 4K W+1 -150 23 67.65
11 EO 3C S+2 200 32 94.12
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,25 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 26 76.47
14 EO 3C E+2 -200 26 76.47
15 EO 3C N = 140 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %16 EO 3P W = -140 34 100.00
17 EO 3C S = 140 20 58.82
18 EO 4P N = 620 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 30 88.24
20 EO 4C E-1 100 21 61.76
21 EO 2P E-1 50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 3 8.82
23 EO 5K S = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 3S E-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %25 EO 4C S-1 -50 30 88.24
26 EO 60%60% Ajust 20.4 60.00
27 EO 3S S-2 -100 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 7 20.59
29 EO 3K W+2 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 2P S = 110 6.4 18.82 µ Tbl = 30,78 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %31 EO 3T N-1 -100 29 85.29
32 EO 4C E+1 -650 32 94.12
33 EO 3S S = 400 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
Total : 637,8 / 1122 = 56,84 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 CORNEROTTE André -WILDIERS Lydia
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 8 23.53
2 EO 1S S = 90 14 41.18
3 EO 4CcE = -790 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 % 4 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 41.18
5 EO 4P S = 620 13 38.24
6 EO 2K W+1 -110 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 % 7 EO 7S W-2 200 1 2.94
8 EO 1S W-1 50 12 35.29
9 EO 5P E+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %10 EO 2P W-1 100 2 5.88
11 EO 5C N = 450 10 29.41
12 EO 2S E = -120 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %13 EO 1S S = 90 17 50.00
14 EO 4C W = -420 30 88.24
15 EO 3P E-3 150 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 21 61.76
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 28 82.35
18 EO 6S N-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %19 EO 4PcS-2 -300 16 47.06
20 EO 5TcE-2 500 3 8.82
21 EO 1S W+2 -150 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 30 88.24
23 EO 5K N = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 4P W-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 30 88.24
26 EO 4P N = 620 14.9 43.82
27 EO 2K W-1 50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 59,71 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %28 EO 4PcN-1 -200 22 64.71
29 EO 3K E+2 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 3P S-2 -100 31.8 93.53 µ Tbl = 70,39 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %31 EO 1S N = 90 14 41.18
32 EO 4C E-1 100 5 14.71
33 EO 3S S = 400 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
Total : 547,7 / 1122 = 48,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 THIRY Jean-Jacques -HALLEZ Serge
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 % 1 EO 3P S+2 200 27 79.41
2 EO 2K S+1 110 5 14.71
3 EO 5CcE-1 200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 28 82.35
5 EO 4P S = 620 13 38.24
6 EO 4T N = 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 % 7 EO 6S W-1 100 5 14.71
8 EO 1S W = -90 23 67.65
9 EO 5C W+1 -680 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %10 EO 2K E+3 -150 23 67.65
11 EO 6K S-6 -300 34 100.00
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 77,45 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 30 88.24
14 EO 4C W-1 50 6 17.65
15 EO 2K E+2 -130 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %16 EO 3K N+1 130 4 11.76
17 EO 4P S = 420 8 23.53
18 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 30 88.24
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 34 100.00
21 EO 2T W = -90 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 84,31 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %22 EO 2C W+2 -170 10 29.41
23 EO 5K N = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 4P W-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %25 EO 4P N = 420 7 20.59
26 EO 3KcW = -670 33.9 99.71
27 EO 3S S = 400 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 41,08 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %28 EO 4C W = -420 30 88.24
29 EO 2K E+3 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 3K E-1 50 19.1 56.18 µ Tbl = 65,78 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %31 EO 1S S = 90 14 41.18
32 EO 4C E+1 -650 32 94.12
33 EO 1T S+2 110 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
Total : 602,0 / 1122 = 53,65 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 DUBOIS Claire -HUEGAERTS Frank
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 23.53
2 EO 3T E-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 5PcN-3 -500 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 % 4 EO 3K E-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 2P S+1 140 26 76.47
6 EO 4K E-2 200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 28,43 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 21 61.76
8 EO 2K S-3 -150 34 100.00
9 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %10 EO 2K E+1 -110 7 20.59
11 EO 4C N = 420 27 79.41
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %13 EO 3T N-3 -300 33 97.06
14 EO 3C E = -140 17 50.00
15 EO 3K W-1 50 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %16 EO 3K N = 110 12 35.29
17 EO 4P N = 420 8 23.53
18 EO 6P S-2 -200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %19 EO 2S W+2 -180 11 32.35
20 EO 4CcW-2 500 3 8.82
21 EO 4PcE-1 100 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 25,49 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %22 EO 4C W = -620 18 52.94
23 EO 5K N+1 620 2 5.88
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %25 EO 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 27.6 81.18
27 EO 1S S = 90 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 57,45 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %28 EO 5C W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 2K E+3 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 3P S = 140 2.2 6.47 µ Tbl = 19,80 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %31 EO 3T S-1 -100 29 85.29
32 EO 4C E-1 100 5 14.71
33 EO 2P S+1 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 525,8 / 1122 = 46,86 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 DUBOIS Daniel -JAMIN Georges
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 % 1 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00
2 EO 2K N = 90 14 41.18
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 32 94.12
5 EO 4P S+1 650 3 8.82
6 EO 3K W = -110 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 % 7 EO 6S E = -1440 34 100.00
8 EO 1S E = -90 23 67.65
9 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %10 EO 2K E+2 -130 14 41.18
11 EO 4C S+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %13 EO 1S S = 90 17 50.00
14 EO 2C E+2 -170 24 70.59
15 EO 4T E-2 100 15 44.12 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %16 EO 3T W = -110 29 85.29
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 28 82.35
18 EO 6T N = 1370 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %19 EO 1S W+3 -180 11 32.35
20 EO 5KcS-1 -200 27 79.41
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 30 88.24
23 EO 5K S = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 3K W+1 -130 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 71,57 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %25 EO 4C S-1 -50 30 88.24
26 EO 5KcW-1 200 22.3 65.59
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 72,84 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 7 20.59
29 EO 5K E = -600 31 91.18
30 EO 3K E-3 150 0.1 0.29 µ Tbl = 37,35 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %31 EO 3T N-1 -100 29 85.29
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 10 29.41
33 EO 2S N-1 -50 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
Total : 651,4 / 1122 = 58,06 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 de BODT Michel -GELIBTER Daniel
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 8 23.53
2 EO 2T E = -90 25 73.53
3 EO 4PcN-1 -100 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 % 4 EO 2KxE+2 -1560 34 100.00
5 EO 4P S = 620 13 38.24
6 EO 4T S = 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 % 7 EO 6C E = -1430 30 88.24
8 EO 1S E = -90 23 67.65
9 EO 6P E+1 -1460 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %10 EO 2K E+2 -130 14 41.18
11 EO 4C N+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %13 EO 1S N = 90 17 50.00
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 17 50.00
15 EO 1S W-3 150 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %16 EO 5T W-1 100 21 61.76
17 EO 2C N+1 140 20 58.82
18 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %19 EO 3PcN-2 -300 16 47.06
20 EO 5CcW-3 800 0 0.00
21 EO 4PcE-2 300 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 18,63 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %22 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 23.53
23 EO 5K S = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 3S W-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %25 EO 4P S = 420 7 20.59
26 EO 3PcS+3 1330 0.1 0.29
27 EO 2K W = -90 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 34,41 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %28 EO 5C W-1 50 7 20.59
29 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 3K E-1 50 19.1 56.18 µ Tbl = 25,59 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %31 EO 3K W-1 50 20 58.82
32 EO 4C E = -620 26 76.47
33 EO 3S N = 400 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
Total : 506,2 / 1122 = 45,12 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 Van Den Hove Wouter -Bahbout Sam
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 % 1 EO 3P S+1 170 31 91.18
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 30 88.24
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 % 4 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 41.18
5 EO 2P S+3 200 22 64.71
6 EO 4T S = 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 % 7 EO 6C E = -1430 30 88.24
8 EO 1S W-2 100 5 14.71
9 EO 6P E = -1430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %10 EO 3CcS-1 -200 28 82.35
11 EO 4C N = 420 27 79.41
12 EO 3S E-1 50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %13 EO 2PcE-1 200 0 0.00
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 34 100.00
15 EO 3T E-1 50 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %16 EO 3K N = 110 12 35.29
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 28 82.35
18 EO 6T N = 1370 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 22 64.71
20 EO 5KcS-1 -200 27 79.41
21 EO 2CxE-2 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %22 EO 3S W = -600 12 35.29
23 EO 5K N = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 3S W-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 27.6 81.18
27 EO 2S S-2 -100 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 58,43 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %28 EO 4C E = -420 30 88.24
29 EO 4K E+1 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 4K E-2 100 11.7 34.41 µ Tbl = 58,53 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %31 EO 3CcW-1 100 6 17.65
32 EO 4C W+1 -650 32 94.12
33 EO 3T S = 110 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
Total : 610,3 / 1122 = 54,39 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 ANGELINI Letizia -COUTEAUX Antonella
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 % 1 EO 2P S+4 230 23 67.65
2 EO 2T E = -90 25 73.53
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 % 4 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 41.18
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 30 88.24
6 EO 5KcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 35.29
8 EO 1S W = -90 23 67.65
9 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 %10 EO 3T E+1 -130 14 41.18
11 EO 4C S+1 420 27 79.41
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %13 EO 2C N = 110 8 23.53
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 17 50.00
15 EO 5K W-2 100 15 44.12 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %16 EO 3K N = 110 12 35.29
17 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00
18 EO 6T N-2 -200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 64.71
20 EO 5P E-3 300 7 20.59
21 EO 3P E-2 100 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %22 EO 4C W = -620 18 52.94
23 EO 3K S+2 150 31 91.18
24 EO 3S E-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %25 EO 3C S+1 170 23 67.65
26 EO 4P N+2 680 4.3 12.65
27 EO 2S S+1 150 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %28 EO 4C E = -420 30 88.24
29 EO 3S E-1 100 3 8.82
30 EO 3PcS-2 -300 33.9 99.71 µ Tbl = 65,59 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %31 EO 3T N-1 -100 29 85.29
32 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 2S N+1 150 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
Total : 554,2 / 1122 = 49,39 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 WOEDSTAD Philippe -DE DUVE Alain
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 % 1 EO 2P S = 110 34 100.00
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 30 88.24
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 78,43 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 14 41.18
5 EO 2P S+3 200 22 64.71
6 EO 3K W = -110 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 % 7 EO 6C E = -1430 30 88.24
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 31 91.18
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 91,18 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 %10 EO 3S W = -600 31 91.18
11 EO 4C S+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 3 8.82
14 EO 4C E-1 50 6 17.65
15 EO 2C N+1 140 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 17,65 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %16 EO 4K N = 130 4 11.76
17 EO 2P S+2 170 14 41.18
18 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %19 EO 4PcS-2 -300 16 47.06
20 EO 4C W-2 200 14 41.18
21 EO 3P W = -140 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %22 EO 4C E = -620 18 52.94
23 EO 5K N+1 620 2 5.88
24 EO 3S W-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %25 EO 4P N = 420 7 20.59
26 EO 4P N+1 650 8.5 25.00
27 EO 3S S = 400 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 16,18 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %28 EO 4PcN-1 -200 22 64.71
29 EO 3S E = -600 31 91.18
30 EO 1S N-1 -50 27.6 81.18 µ Tbl = 79,02 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %31 EO 2T N+1 110 1 2.94
32 EO 4C W = -620 26 76.47
33 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,47 %
Total : 561,1 / 1122 = 50,01 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 MARQUEZ Juan -MARQUEZ Ana
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 17 50.00
2 EO 2K S+1 110 5 14.71
3 EO 5CcE-1 200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 23.53
5 EO 4P S = 620 13 38.24
6 EO 5T N-1 -50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 35.29
8 EO 2KcE-2 300 0 0.00
9 EO 5P E+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,43 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 %10 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 4C S+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 2K E = -90 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 15,69 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %13 EO 1S S = 90 17 50.00
14 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 4K W = -130 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %16 EO 4P W-1 100 21 61.76
17 EO 3P S+1 170 14 41.18
18 EO 6T N-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %19 EO 3PcN-1 -100 7 20.59
20 EO 4P E-3 300 7 20.59
21 EO 2P W = -110 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %22 EO 3S W-1 100 3 8.82
23 EO 5T W-2 200 28 82.35
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %25 EO 4P N = 420 7 20.59
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 27.6 81.18
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 55,49 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %28 EO 5C W-1 50 7 20.59
29 EO 5K E = -600 31 91.18
30 EO 2P S = 110 6.4 18.82 µ Tbl = 43,53 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %31 EO 1S W = -90 22 64.71
32 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 44.12
33 EO 2T S+1 110 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
Total : 488,0 / 1122 = 43,49 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 Scheps Paul -FENIGER Bella
A.6 MANISE Dominique -ROY Philippe : 41,92 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 8 23.53
2 EO 4T E-2 100 9 26.47
3 EO 5T S-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
A.1 VERCAMMEN Paul -ENGEL Zvi : 55,02 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 28 82.35
5 EO 4P S+1 650 3 8.82
6 EO 4T N = 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
A.7 MEYER Jean -VANDERVORST Mike : 60,12 % 7 EO 2PcS-2 -500 8 23.53
8 EO 2C N-1 -50 18 52.94
9 EO 5P E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,49 %
A.2 MASSINON Henry -CHABOTIER Jean : 59,96 %10 EO 2K E+1 -110 7 20.59
11 EO 4C S+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 1S E-1 50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 18,63 %
A.8 DELAFAILLE Patrick -SERVAIS Nadine : 45,48 %13 EO 4K S-3 -300 33 97.06
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 17 50.00
15 EO 4K E-1 50 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
A.3 DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy -KUNKERA Nathalie : 63,28 %16 EO 2K N+2 130 4 11.76
17 EO 4C S+1 450 3 8.82
18 EO 5T N = 600 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 18,63 %
A.9 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel : 43,55 %19 EO 5TcE-3 800 0 0.00
20 EO 5T E-2 200 14 41.18
21 EO 2P E-1 50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
A.4 THYS Jeanine -GROSFILS Colette : 36,17 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 34 100.00
23 EO 5K N+1 620 2 5.88
24 EO 3S E = -400 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
A10 Van Middelem Guy -STUYCK Dominique : 50,81 %25 EO 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 EO 5P N = 650 8.5 25.00
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 46,57 %
A.5 BARRO Chantal -CLAESSENS Jérôme : 40,68 %28 EO 4C W = -420 30 88.24
29 EO 2T E+2 -130 8 23.53
30 EO 50%60% Ajust 20.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,25 %
A11 CLAEYS Yves -GOBBE Michel : 57,64 %31 EO 3T N = 110 1 2.94
32 EO 2S E = -120 12 35.29
33 EO 1P S+2 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
Total : 444,9 / 1122 = 39,65 %
PAIRE Nr : B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 8 23.53
2 EO 1S E-1 50 20 58.82
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 % 4 EO 2K E+2 -130 21 61.76
5 EO 4P N = 620 13 38.24
6 EO 3P N-3 -150 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 % 7 NS 6T E+1 -1390 8 23.53
8 NS 1S E-1 50 22 64.71
9 NS 5C E+1 -680 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %10 NS 2K E+2 -130 20 58.82
11 NS 4C N+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %13 EO 3K N-1 -100 26 76.47
14 EO 4C E = -420 30 88.24
15 EO 2C N+1 140 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %16 NS 3T E = -110 5 14.71
17 NS 4C N = 420 26 76.47
18 NS 3S N+1 630 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %19 NS 2K N-2 -100 27 79.41
20 NS 4C E-2 200 20 58.82
21 NS 4P E-3 150 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 30 88.24
23 EO 5K S = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 2S E = -120 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %25 NS 4P N = 420 27 79.41
26 NS 4P N+1 650 25.5 75.00
27 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 53,43 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %28 NS 4C E = -420 4 11.76
29 NS 1S E+1 -120 28 82.35
30 NS 3K E-1 50 14.9 43.82 µ Tbl = 45,98 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %31 EO 3T N-1 -100 29 85.29
32 EO 2C E+3 -200 22 64.71
33 EO 3S N = 400 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
Total : 659,4 / 1122 = 58,77 %
PAIRE Nr : B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 17 50.00
2 EO 3T E-1 50 20 58.82
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 % 4 EO 2K E = -90 4 11.76
5 EO 4P S = 620 13 38.24
6 EO 2P N = 110 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 % 7 EO 7S E-2 200 1 2.94
8 EO 1S W-1 50 12 35.29
9 EO 4P E+2 -680 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 17,65 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %10 NS 3K E+1 -130 20 58.82
11 NS 4C N+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %13 EO 2C N = 110 8 23.53
14 EO 4C E = -420 30 88.24
15 EO 2S W+1 -150 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %16 EO 3T E = -110 29 85.29
17 EO 4C N = 420 8 23.53
18 EO 3S N+1 630 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %19 NS 2P N = 110 30 88.24
20 NS 4TcE-1 200 20 58.82
21 NS 3S W-1 50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 31 91.18
23 NS 5K S = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 2S E = -120 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 30 88.24
26 EO 5KcW-2 500 19.1 56.18
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 69,71 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 27 79.41
29 NS 2K E+3 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 4T S-1 -50 6.4 18.82 µ Tbl = 48,43 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %31 NS 2T N = 90 20 58.82
32 NS 3C E+1 -170 15 44.12
33 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
Total : 555,5 / 1122 = 49,51 %
PAIRE Nr : B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 26 76.47
2 NS 4K N = 130 32 94.12
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 74,51 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 % 4 EO 2K E = -90 4 11.76
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 34 100.00
6 EO 4T S = 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 21 61.76
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 31 91.18
9 EO 5C W+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %10 EO 3C S-1 -100 4 11.76
11 EO 4C S+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 26,47 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %13 NS 1S N = 90 17 50.00
14 NS 3C E = -140 17 50.00
15 NS 3T E = -110 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %16 EO 4T W = -130 32 94.12
17 EO 2P S+2 170 14 41.18
18 EO 6S S-2 -200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %19 EO 2P N = 110 4 11.76
20 EO 4TcE-1 200 14 41.18
21 EO 3S W-1 50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %22 NS 4C E = -620 16 47.06
23 NS 5K N-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 4P E-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 23 67.65
26 EO 4P N = 620 14.9 43.82
27 EO 2S S+1 150 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 42,06 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %28 EO 4C E = -420 30 88.24
29 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 17.65
30 EO 3K E-1 50 19.1 56.18 µ Tbl = 54,02 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %31 NS 3KcE-1 100 28 82.35
32 NS 3C E = -140 19 55.88
33 NS 4T N = 130 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
Total : 576,0 / 1122 = 51,34 %
PAIRE Nr : B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 % 1 NS 2P S+3 200 7 20.59
2 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00
3 NS 4PcN = 590 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 % 4 NS 3K E+1 -130 13 38.24
5 NS 4P S+1 650 31 91.18
6 NS 3KcW = -670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 % 7 EO 6T E+1 -1390 26 76.47
8 EO 1S E-1 50 12 35.29
9 EO 5C E+1 -680 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %10 EO 2K E+3 -150 23 67.65
11 EO 4C N+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 3 8.82
14 EO 3C E = -140 17 50.00
15 EO 3K E = -110 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %16 NS 3K N = 110 22 64.71
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 6 17.65
18 NS 6S S-2 -200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 30 88.24
20 EO 4P W = -620 31 91.18
21 EO 4P E-3 150 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %22 EO 4C E = -620 18 52.94
23 EO 5K N-1 -100 34 100.00
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %25 NS 4C S = 420 27 79.41
26 NS 4C E-2 200 11.7 34.41
27 NS 2S S = 120 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 62,45 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %28 EO 4P N-2 -200 22 64.71
29 EO 5K E = -600 31 91.18
30 EO 3K W-1 50 19.1 56.18 µ Tbl = 70,69 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %31 EO 2T N = 90 14 41.18
32 EO 3C E+1 -170 19 55.88
33 EO 3S S-2 -100 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
Total : 590,8 / 1122 = 52,66 %
PAIRE Nr : B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 8 23.53
2 EO 4K N = 130 2 5.88
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 25,49 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 % 4 NS 2K E+2 -130 13 38.24
5 NS 4P N = 620 21 61.76
6 NS 3P N-3 -150 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 22 64.71
8 NS 1S E-1 50 22 64.71
9 NS 6P E+1 -1460 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %10 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 41.18
11 EO 4C N+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %13 EO 2C N = 110 8 23.53
14 EO 3C E-1 50 6 17.65
15 EO 1S W-3 150 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 15,69 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %16 EO 3K N-1 -50 26 76.47
17 EO 3S N-2 -100 34 100.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %19 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 11.76
20 NS 4P E-1 100 13 38.24
21 NS 4PcE-2 300 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %22 EO 4C W = -620 18 52.94
23 EO 4K S+1 150 31 91.18
24 EO 2S S-2 -100 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %25 EO 4C S = 420 7 20.59
26 EO 4C E-2 200 22.3 65.59
27 EO 2S S = 120 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 37,55 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 19 55.88
29 NS 3S E-1 100 31 91.18
30 NS 2P N-1 -50 6.4 18.82 µ Tbl = 55,29 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %31 EO 1S S = 90 14 41.18
32 EO 3S E-1 100 5 14.71
33 EO 2P S+1 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
Total : 494,7 / 1122 = 44,09 %
PAIRE Nr : B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 % 1 EO 2P S+4 230 23 67.65
2 EO 1S E-2 100 9 26.47
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 % 4 EO 3K E+1 -130 21 61.76
5 EO 4P S+1 650 3 8.82
6 EO 3KcW = -670 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 % 7 NS 7S E-2 200 33 97.06
8 NS 1S W-1 50 22 64.71
9 NS 4P E+2 -680 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 82,35 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %10 NS 3S W = -600 3 8.82
11 NS 4C S+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %13 EO 1S N = 90 17 50.00
14 EO 3C E = -140 17 50.00
15 EO 3T E = -110 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %16 EO 2C N = 110 12 35.29
17 EO 4C S+1 450 3 8.82
18 EO 6K N-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 22 64.71
20 EO 5T E-2 200 14 41.18
21 EO 3T N-3 -300 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 31 91.18
23 NS 5K N = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 3S E-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %25 EO 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 EO 4P N = 620 14.9 43.82
27 EO 2PcW-1 100 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 43,04 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 44.12
29 EO 3S E-1 100 3 8.82
30 EO 2P N-1 -50 27.6 81.18 µ Tbl = 44,71 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %31 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 14.71
32 NS 4C E = -620 8 23.53
33 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 13,73 %
Total : 566,5 / 1122 = 50,49 %
PAIRE Nr : B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 % 1 NS 3CcE-2 300 14 41.18
2 NS 3T E-1 50 14 41.18
3 NS 5T N-2 -100 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 % 4 NS 2K E+1 -110 20 58.82
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 11.76
6 NS 3T S+1 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 35.29
8 EO 1S E-1 50 12 35.29
9 EO 6P E+1 -1460 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %10 NS 3C S-1 -100 30 88.24
11 NS 4C S+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 73,53 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %13 NS 1S N = 90 17 50.00
14 NS 4C E-1 50 28 82.35
15 NS 3C N = 140 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %16 EO 3K N = 110 12 35.29
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 28 82.35
18 EO 6S S-2 -200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %19 EO 2PcN = 470 2 5.88
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 24 70.59
21 EO 4P W-2 100 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 25 73.53
23 EO 5K S = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 4K E-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 11.76
26 NS 4P N-2 -200 2.2 6.47
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 17,84 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 44.12
29 EO 3K E+2 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 2P S = 110 6.4 18.82 µ Tbl = 38,63 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %31 EO 3T N-1 -100 29 85.29
32 EO 4C E = -620 26 76.47
33 EO 3S N-2 -100 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 86,27 %
Total : 583,6 / 1122 = 52,01 %
PAIRE Nr : B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 % 1 EO 3CcE-2 300 20 58.82
2 EO 3T E-1 50 20 58.82
3 EO 5T N-2 -100 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 % 4 NS 2K E = -90 30 88.24
5 NS 2P S+3 200 12 35.29
6 NS 4T N = 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 % 7 NS 6S W-1 100 29 85.29
8 NS 2C N = 110 32 94.12
9 NS 5P W+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,47 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %10 EO 3S W = -600 31 91.18
11 EO 4C S+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 31 91.18
14 NS 3C E = -140 17 50.00
15 NS 3K E = -110 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %16 NS 4T E-1 100 13 38.24
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 6 17.65
18 NS 4S S-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %19 EO 3S E+2 -660 30 88.24
20 EO 4P E-1 100 21 61.76
21 EO 4PcE-2 300 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 25 73.53
23 EO 6TcE-2 500 26 76.47
24 EO 3S E-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %25 EO 4P N = 420 7 20.59
26 EO 4P N+1 650 8.5 25.00
27 EO 3S S-2 -100 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 46,57 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %28 NS 3C W = -140 16 47.06
29 NS 3K E+2 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 3K W-2 100 22.3 65.59 µ Tbl = 53,24 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 %31 NS 1S N = 90 20 58.82
32 NS 3C W+1 -170 15 44.12
33 NS 1P S+2 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
Total : 635,8 / 1122 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 % 1 NS 2P N+2 170 3 8.82
2 NS 2K S = 90 20 58.82
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 % 4 EO 2K E = -90 4 11.76
5 EO 2P S+3 200 22 64.71
6 EO 4T N = 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 13 38.24
8 NS 2P N-2 -100 6 17.65
9 NS 4P E+2 -680 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
11 NS 4C S = 420 7 20.59
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %13 EO 1S N = 90 17 50.00
14 EO 4C E-1 50 6 17.65
15 EO 3C N = 140 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %16 NS 3K N-1 -50 8 23.53
17 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 11.76
20 NS 4P E = -620 3 8.82
21 NS 2P W = -110 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 13,73 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 3 8.82
23 EO 5K N = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 3S E-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %25 EO 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 EO 4PcN+1 990 2.2 6.47
27 EO 2S S = 120 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 27,65 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 7 20.59
29 EO 2K E+3 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 4T S-1 -50 27.6 81.18 µ Tbl = 51,57 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %31 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 14.71
32 NS 2C E+3 -200 12 35.29
33 NS 3S N = 400 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
Total : 390,8 / 1122 = 34,83 %
PAIRE Nr : B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 17 50.00
2 NS 3T E-1 50 14 41.18
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 6 17.65
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 11.76
6 NS 3S E-2 200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 21 61.76
8 EO 2P N-2 -100 28 82.35
9 EO 4P E+2 -680 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %10 NS 3K E+2 -150 11 32.35
11 NS 3S N+1 430 12 35.29
12 NS 3S E-1 50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %13 NS 2T N-1 -100 8 23.53
14 NS 4C E-1 50 28 82.35
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %16 EO 4T E-1 100 21 61.76
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 28 82.35
18 EO 4S S-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12 35.29
20 NS 5T E-2 200 20 58.82
21 NS 3T N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 11.76
23 NS 5K S = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 2S E = -120 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 30 88.24
26 EO 4P N-2 -200 31.8 93.53
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 82,16 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %28 EO 5C W-1 50 7 20.59
29 EO 2K E+3 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 1S E-1 50 19.1 56.18 µ Tbl = 43,24 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %31 EO 3KcE-1 100 6 17.65
32 EO 3C E = -140 15 44.12
33 EO 4T N = 130 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
Total : 544,9 / 1122 = 48,57 %
PAIRE Nr : B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 % 1 EO 2P S+3 200 27 79.41
2 EO 3T E = -110 34 100.00
3 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 % 4 NS 2K E = -90 30 88.24
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 4T S = 130 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 44,09 % 7 NS 3S W+2 -660 18 52.94
8 NS 1S W-1 50 22 64.71
9 NS 5C W+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %10 EO 3K E+2 -150 23 67.65
11 EO 3S N+1 430 22 64.71
12 EO 3S E-1 50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %13 NS 3K N-1 -100 8 23.53
14 NS 4C E = -420 4 11.76
15 NS 2C N+1 140 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc : 46,26 %16 NS 1CcS+1 260 34 100.00
17 NS 2C S+1 140 14 41.18
18 NS 4S S+1 660 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 76,47 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 30 88.24
20 EO 4P E = -620 31 91.18
21 EO 2P W = -110 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 86,27 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 26.47
23 NS 5K S = 600 19 55.88
24 NS 4K E-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 11.76
26 NS 5KcW-2 500 14.9 43.82
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 30,29 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %28 EO 3C W = -140 18 52.94
29 EO 3K E+2 -150 18 52.94
30 EO 3K W-2 100 11.7 34.41 µ Tbl = 46,76 %
B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric : 60,22 %31 EO 2CcW-1 100 6 17.65
32 EO 3S E-1 100 5 14.71
33 EO 3S N = 400 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 566,6 / 1122 = 50,50 %
PAIRE Nr : B12 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 % 1 EO 2P N+2 170 31 91.18
2 EO 2K S = 90 14 41.18
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 28 82.35
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 30 88.24
6 EO 3S E-2 200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 % 7 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 47.06
8 EO 1S W-1 50 12 35.29
9 EO 5C W+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %10 EO 2K E+2 -130 14 41.18
11 EO 4C N+1 450 10 29.41
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %13 NS 2C N = 110 26 76.47
14 NS 4C E = -420 4 11.76
15 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %16 NS 4T W = -130 2 5.88
17 NS 2P S+2 170 20 58.82
18 NS 6S S-2 -200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 11.76
20 NS 4P W = -620 3 8.82
21 NS 4P E-3 150 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %22 NS 4C W = -620 16 47.06
23 NS 4K S+1 150 3 8.82
24 NS 2S S-2 -100 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %25 NS 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 NS 4P N = 620 19.1 56.18
27 NS 2PcW-1 100 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 56,96 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 19 55.88
29 NS 3K E+2 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 2P S = 110 27.6 81.18 µ Tbl = 61,37 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %31 EO 1S N = 90 14 41.18
32 EO 3C W+1 -170 19 55.88
33 EO 1P S+2 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
Total : 494,7 / 1122 = 44,09 %
PAIRE Nr : B13 PLETSER Olga -BAUHERZ Marc
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 % 1 NS 2P S+4 230 11 32.35
2 NS 1S E-2 100 25 73.53
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 % 4 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 41.18
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 30 88.24
6 EO 3T S+1 130 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 % 7 EO 6S W-1 100 5 14.71
8 EO 2C N = 110 2 5.88
9 EO 5P W+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,53 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 34 100.00
11 EO 4C S = 420 27 79.41
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %13 EO 2T N-1 -100 26 76.47
14 EO 4C E-1 50 6 17.65
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %16 EO 1CcS+1 260 0 0.00
17 EO 2C S+1 140 20 58.82
18 EO 4S S+1 660 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 23,53 %
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 %19 EO 2K N-2 -100 7 20.59
20 EO 4C E-2 200 14 41.18
21 EO 4P E-3 150 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 3 8.82
23 EO 5K S = 600 15 44.12
24 EO 2S E = -120 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 11 32.35
26 NS 4P N = 620 19.1 56.18
27 NS 2S S+1 150 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 57,94 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %28 NS 4P N-2 -200 12 35.29
29 NS 5K E = -600 3 8.82
30 NS 3K W-1 50 14.9 43.82 µ Tbl = 29,31 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %31 NS 1S S = 90 20 58.82
32 NS 3S E-1 100 29 85.29
33 NS 2P S+1 140 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
Total : 519,0 / 1122 = 46,26 %
PAIRE Nr : B14 CALAS Damien -COLINET Eric
B.1 LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre -HENRI Jacques : 58,77 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 26 76.47
2 NS 1S E-1 50 14 41.18
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
B.2 BERBERS Katrien -KELDERMANS Georges : 49,51 % 4 NS 2K E = -90 30 88.24
5 NS 4P S = 620 21 61.76
6 NS 2P N = 110 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
B.3 SAUVAGE Eric -BOLLACK Léna : 51,34 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 13 38.24
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 8.82
9 NS 5C W+2 -710 17 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
B.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,66 %10 NS 2K E+3 -150 11 32.35
11 NS 4C N+1 450 24 70.59
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
B.5 BOKAI Elisabeth -OTTO Liliane : 44,09 %13 NS 2C N = 110 26 76.47
14 NS 3C E-1 50 28 82.35
15 NS 1S W-3 150 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 84,31 %
B.6 GELIBTER Bernadette -BERBEN Martine : 50,49 %16 NS 2C N = 110 22 64.71
17 NS 4C S+1 450 31 91.18
18 NS 6K N-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
B.7 CYPRES Suzanne -PETIT Frederique : 52,01 %19 NS 2PcN = 470 32 94.12
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 10 29.41
21 NS 4P W-2 100 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
B.8 de RAVINEL Catherine -de RAVINEL Thierry : 56,67 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 26.47
23 NS 6TcE-2 500 8 23.53
24 NS 3S E-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.9 COELHO Béatriz -COELHO Paulo : 34,83 %25 NS 3S N = 400 17 50.00
26 NS 4PcN+1 990 31.8 93.53
27 NS 2S S = 120 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 72,35 %
B10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -VAN GIJSEGEM Thierry : 48,57 %28 NS 5C W-1 50 27 79.41
29 NS 2K E+3 -150 16 47.06
30 NS 1S E-1 50 14.9 43.82 µ Tbl = 56,76 %
B11 MIROSLAW Wieslawa -POLETTO Patrick : 50,50 %31 NS 2CcW-1 100 28 82.35
32 NS 3S E-1 100 29 85.29
33 NS 3S N = 400 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 675,7 / 1122 = 60,22 %
|
|