B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 64,94 a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy
--- 2 56,42 A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel
--- 3 58,33 a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold
--- 4 56,39 B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard
--- 5 56,13 A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel
--- 6 55,72 b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
--- 7 55,38 A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé
--- 8 54,80 a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier
--- 9 54,21 b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc
--- 10 53,86 b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel
--- 11 53,61 b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy
--- 12 53,39 a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick
--- 13 53,36 B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond
--- ~ 53,36 A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude
--- 15 53,21 B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan
--- 16 52,93 A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal
--- 17 52,85 a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse
--- 18 52,69 A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique
--- 19 52,59 A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane
--- 20 52,20 b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David
--- 21 51,11 B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel
--- 22 51,07 B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain
--- 23 50,92 A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur
--- 24 50,64 b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain
--- 25 50,23 b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric
--- 26 50,19 B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam
--- 27 49,99 a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges
--- 28 49,63 b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter
--- 29 49,59 B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz
--- 30 49,30 a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie
--- 31 48,31 B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne
--- 32 47,89 b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian
--- 33 47,54 A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ.
--- 34 46,59 b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques
--- 35 46,45 B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
--- 36 46,38 B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan
--- 37 46,28 b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne
--- 38 45,57 b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline
--- 39 45,06 A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian
--- 40 43,86 B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre
--- 41 43,64 B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale
--- 42 42,78 a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie
--- 43 42,40 a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc
--- 44 40,79 a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno
--- 45 34,09 A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine
--- 46 33,33 a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France
PAIRE a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 22 50.00
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 24 54.55
3 EO 2K N+2 130 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 1P N-1 -100 21 47.73
6 EO 3S S = 400 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
7 EO 1S S-2 -200 44 100.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 3P E = -140 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 36 81.82
11 EO 3P E-2 100 21 47.73
12 EO 5P W = -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
13 EO 2P E+2 -170 42 95.45
14 EO 5CcE-1 100 10.5 23.86
15 EO 4P N+1 650 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
16 EO 5TcE = -750 44 100.00
17 EO 6C N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 42 95.45
20 EO 3T N-2 -200 40 90.91
21 EO 2P E = -110 40 90.91 µ Tbl = 92,42 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 31 70.45
23 EO 4P E = -620 38 86.36
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
25 EO 3S S-3 -150 38 86.36
26 EO 4T N-1 -100 31 70.45
27 EO 3S W = -400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,06 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
28 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 25.00
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2S S = 120 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
31 EO 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S = 110 26.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 942,9 / 1452 = 64,94 %
PAIRE A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 29 65.91
2 NS 4T S-1 -100 20 45.45
3 NS 3P S+1 170 10 22.73 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
4 NS 4C W-1 100 41 93.18
5 NS 2K W = -90 30 68.18
6 NS 3S S+1 430 31 70.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
7 NS 2S S+1 150 39 88.64
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 2P E = -110 16 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 2K N+2 130 35 79.55
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
13 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 4.55
14 NS 5CcE-1 100 33.5 76.14
15 NS 4P N+1 650 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
16 NS 4P N-2 -100 35 79.55
17 NS 6P N = 980 21 47.73
18 NS 3K S-1 -100 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 23 52.27
20 NS 1P W-1 100 26 59.09
21 NS 2S N+1 150 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
22 NS 5C W-2 200 38 86.36
23 NS 4C N+1 650 40 90.91
24 NS 3C S = 140 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3PcW+1 -930 0 0.00
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
28 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 3S N = 400 41 93.18 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
31 NS 3T N = 110 36 81.82
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 4P S-1 -50 6.7 15.23 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
Total : 819,2 / 1452 = 56,42 %
PAIRE a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 15 34.09
2 EO 4T S-1 -100 24 54.55
3 EO 3P S+1 170 34 77.27 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 40 90.91
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 21 47.73
6 EO 3T S = 110 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
7 EO 1K E+1 -90 36 81.82
8 EO 2S W+3 -210 12 27.27
9 EO 3P E-1 100 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 3K N-1 -50 40 90.91
12 EO 5P W = -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
13 EO 1P E+3 -170 42 95.45
14 EO 5C W-1 50 19.9 45.23
15 EO 4P N+1 650 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 51,44 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
16 EO 5C W+1 -680 41 93.18
17 EO 6C N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 4K N-2 -200 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 35 79.55
20 EO 3S W-3 300 4 9.09
21 EO 2C W-1 50 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
22 EO 4C W = -620 41 93.18
23 EO 4P E-1 100 23 52.27
24 EO 2S N = 120 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 37 84.09
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,88 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
28 EO 3C W+2 -200 22 50.00
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2S N-1 -50 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
31 EO 2S S-1 -100 22 50.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 847,0 / 1452 = 58,33 %
PAIRE B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
1 NS 4CcE-2 300 43 97.73
2 NS 3S N-3 -300 5 11.36
3 NS 4P S = 420 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
4 NS 2C W+1 -140 36 81.82
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 23 52.27
6 NS 3S S+2 460 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 73,48 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
7 NS 1S N = 90 24 54.55
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 2P E = -110 16 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
10 NS 4P S+2 680 44 100.00
11 NS 3K N+1 130 35 79.55
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
13 NS 4P W-2 200 42 95.45
14 NS 5C E-1 50 24.1 54.77
15 NS 4P N+1 650 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 78,86 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
16 NS 5T E = -600 9 20.45
17 NS 4C S+3 510 13 29.55
18 NS 3CcW-1 100 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
19 NS 5K E-1 100 43 97.73
20 NS 1P W-1 100 26 59.09
21 NS 2S S = 120 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 13 29.55
23 NS 4PcE-1 200 28 63.64
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
25 NS -50 35 79.55
26 NS -100 13 29.55
27 NS -400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
28 NS 3C W = -140 42 95.45
29 NS 4K E = -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2S S = 120 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
31 NS 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 4P S-1 -50 6.7 15.23 µ Tbl = 38,41 %
Total : 818,8 / 1452 = 56,39 %
PAIRE A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
1 NS 3K W+1 -130 10 22.73
2 NS 3T S = 110 35 79.55
3 NS 4P S = 420 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 9.09
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 23 52.27
6 NS 3T S = 110 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
7 NS 3K E-2 200 44 100.00
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 3PcE-2 500 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 3C W-1 50 13 29.55
12 NS 6P W-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
13 NS 1S W-1 100 32 72.73
14 NS 5C E-1 50 24.1 54.77
15 NS 4P N = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 59,92 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
16 NS 5TcE = -750 0 0.00
17 NS 6C N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
19 NS 3K W+1 -130 36 81.82
20 NS 2K W = -90 14 31.82
21 NS 3S N = 600 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
22 NS 5C W-2 200 38 86.36
23 NS 4P E-1 100 21 47.73
24 NS 4T S-1 -50 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 35 79.55
26 NS 4T N = 130 23 52.27
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
28 NS 3C W+2 -200 22 50.00
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2C E-2 100 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
31 NS 3C W = -140 14 31.82
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 51,44 %
Total : 815,0 / 1452 = 56,13 %
PAIRE b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
1 EO 2C E = -110 32 72.73
2 EO 3T S+1 130 2 4.55
3 EO 4P S+1 450 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 33 75.00
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
7 EO 1T S+2 110 10 22.73
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 36 81.82
11 EO 2C W-1 50 31 70.45
12 EO 6P W-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
13 EO 2P E = -110 25 56.82
14 EO 5KcN-1 Ajust 17.6 40.00
15 EO 5P N-1 -100 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 61,82 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
16 EO 5PcN-3 -500 31 70.45
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 3P E = -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 50,76 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
19 EO 5KcW = -750 44 100.00
20 EO 2T N = 90 22 50.00
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 43 97.73 µ Tbl = 82,58 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
22 EO 5C W-1 100 20 45.45
23 EO 4P E = -620 38 86.36
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,94 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
25 EO 3S S-4 -200 44 100.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 13 29.55
27 EO 2C N-1 -50 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
28 EO 3C W = -140 2 4.55
29 EO 4K E = -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2S S = 120 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
31 EO 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 40%60% Ajust 26.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 809,0 / 1452 = 55,72 %
PAIRE A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 38 86.36
2 NS 1S N+1 120 40 90.91
3 NS 2K S+3 150 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 62,88 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
4 NS 4C W-1 100 41 93.18
5 NS 2T N-1 -100 23 52.27
6 NS 6T S-2 -100 4 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
7 NS 1K E+1 -90 8 18.18
8 NS 3C W+1 -170 35 79.55
9 NS 3P E-2 200 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 3P W-2 100 23 52.27
12 NS 5P W = -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 50,76 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
13 NS 2P E = -110 19 43.18
14 NS 5P N-2 -100 8.4 19.09
15 NS 4P N+1 650 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 49,55 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
16 NS 5C W+1 -680 3 6.82
17 NS 6C N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 4K N-2 -200 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
19 NS 3K W+1 -130 36 81.82
20 NS 2K E = -90 14 31.82
21 NS 2KcE-4 800 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
22 NS 5C W-1 100 24 54.55
23 NS 4C N = 620 35 79.55
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 35 79.55
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 13 29.55
27 NS 2C N = 110 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
28 NS 2C E+2 -170 33 75.00
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2S S = 120 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
31 NS 1S N+1 120 41 93.18
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 6.7 15.23 µ Tbl = 52,80 %
Total : 804,1 / 1452 = 55,38 %
PAIRE a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 15 34.09
2 EO 3T S = 110 9 20.45
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 2KcS-2 -500 44 100.00
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 40 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,06 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
7 EO 1K E+1 -90 36 81.82
8 EO 3C W+1 -170 9 20.45
9 EO 3P E-2 200 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 36 81.82
11 EO 3P E-2 100 21 47.73
12 EO 6P W-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
13 EO 1S W = -90 21 47.73
14 EO 5PcN-1 -100 35.6 80.91
15 EO 4P N = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 58,79 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
16 EO 5PcN-2 -300 23 52.27
17 EO 6C N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 3C W-1 50 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 35 79.55
20 EO 2K E = -90 30 68.18
21 EO 1S S+2 150 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 31 70.45
23 EO 5C N-1 -100 28 63.64
24 EO 3K E-2 100 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3PcW+1 -930 44 100.00
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
28 EO 3C W+2 -200 22 50.00
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2C E-2 100 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
31 EO 1S N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 795,7 / 1452 = 54,80 %
PAIRE b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 15 34.09
2 EO 3T S = 110 9 20.45
3 EO 4P S = 420 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 32,58 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 1P N-2 -200 33 75.00
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 20 45.45
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 3PcE-1 200 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 2K N+2 130 9 20.45
12 EO 5P W = -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
13 EO 2P E+1 -140 32 72.73
14 EO 5C E-1 50 19.9 45.23
15 EO 3S S = 600 31 70.45 µ Tbl = 62,80 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
16 EO 5P S-3 -150 15 34.09
17 EO 4P N+2 480 38 86.36
18 EO 3P E-1 50 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 49,24 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 35 79.55
20 EO 2S S-2 -200 40 90.91
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
22 EO 4C W-1 100 20 45.45
23 EO 4P E = -620 38 86.36
24 EO 5T S-4 -200 43 97.73 µ Tbl = 76,52 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3PcW = -730 41 93.18
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
28 EO 1S W+2 -150 4 9.09
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2S N = 120 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
31 EO 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 4P S-1 -50 37.3 84.77 µ Tbl = 61,59 %
Total : 787,2 / 1452 = 54,21 %
PAIRE b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
1 EO 1S N-1 -50 27 61.36
2 EO 3CcW-1 100 15 34.09
3 EO 4P S = 420 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 40 90.91
5 EO 2C S-3 -300 42 95.45
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
7 EO 1S N+2 150 5 11.36
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 3PcE = -730 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 2C W-1 50 31 70.45
12 EO 5P E = -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
13 EO 1S W-1 100 12 27.27
14 EO 4CcE = -590 44 100.00
15 EO 5P S-1 -100 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 71,97 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
16 EO 5T E = -600 35 79.55
17 EO 4C S+3 510 31 70.45
18 EO 3CcW-1 100 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
19 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 18.18
20 EO 3S W-4 400 0 0.00
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 43 97.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
22 EO 5C W-1 100 20 45.45
23 EO 3P N-4 -400 32 72.73
24 EO 4P N = 420 1 2.27 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
25 EO 3S S-3 -150 38 86.36
26 EO 3S N+1 630 4 9.09
27 EO 5K E = -400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
28 EO 2C E+3 -200 22 50.00
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2C E-3 150 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
31 EO 2K S = 90 12 27.27
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 34,92 %
Total : 782,1 / 1452 = 53,86 %
PAIRE b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
1 EO 4CcE-2 300 1 2.27
2 EO 3S N-3 -300 39 88.64
3 EO 4P S = 420 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 2P N-2 -200 33 75.00
6 EO 3T S+1 130 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
7 EO 1C S+1 110 10 22.73
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 3P E-2 200 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 35,61 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 3K S+1 130 9 20.45
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 32 72.73
14 EO 5K N-1 -50 29.3 66.59
15 EO 5P N-1 -100 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 75,98 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
16 EO 5PcN-3 -500 31 70.45
17 EO 4P N+1 450 43 97.73
18 EO 4C E-1 50 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 35 79.55
20 EO 2S W-2 200 11 25.00
21 EO 3T N = 110 31 70.45 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
22 EO 5C W-2 200 6 13.64
23 EO 4PcW-1 200 16 36.36
24 EO 3T S+1 130 16 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
25 EO 3S N-3 -150 38 86.36
26 EO 3PcE = -730 41 93.18
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,52 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 4PcW-2 300 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
31 EO 3K S-2 -200 38 86.36
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 54,62 %
Total : 778,4 / 1452 = 53,61 %
PAIRE a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
1 EO 2C E+1 -140 37 84.09
2 EO 3C W-1 50 18 40.91
3 EO 4P S+1 450 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 2C S-2 -200 33 75.00
6 EO 2C S = 110 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
7 EO 2S S+1 150 5 11.36
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 2P E = -110 28 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 3C W-1 50 31 70.45
12 EO 6P W-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
13 EO 1S W+2 -150 38 86.36
14 EO 4C E = -420 41.9 95.23
15 EO 4P N = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 76,44 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
16 EO 4P N-2 -100 9 20.45
17 EO 4P N+3 510 31 70.45
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 21 47.73
20 EO 2P W-1 100 18 40.91
21 EO 3P E-3 150 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
22 EO 5C W-1 100 20 45.45
23 EO 4C N = 620 9 20.45
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3S N = 600 13 29.55
27 EO 5K E = -400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
28 EO 3C E+2 -200 22 50.00
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 3S N = 400 3 6.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
31 EO 3K S-2 -200 38 86.36
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 4P S-1 -50 37.3 84.77 µ Tbl = 73,71 %
Total : 775,2 / 1452 = 53,39 %
PAIRE B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
1 NS 2P S = 110 29 65.91
2 NS 3S N-3 -300 5 11.36
3 NS 4P S+1 450 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 2P N-2 -200 11 25.00
6 NS 3T S+1 130 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
7 NS 1T S+2 110 34 77.27
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 2C W-2 100 23 52.27
12 NS 5P W-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 67,42 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
13 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 27.27
14 NS 5C E-1 50 24.1 54.77
15 NS 4P N = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 44,77 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
16 NS 5C E = -650 6 13.64
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 4T S+1 150 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,39 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
19 NS -600 23 52.27
20 NS -200 4 9.09
21 NS 120 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
22 NS 5C W-1 100 24 54.55
23 NS 3P N-4 -400 12 27.27
24 NS 4P N = 420 43 97.73 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
25 NS 2S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3S N+1 630 40 90.91
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
28 NS 1S W+2 -150 40 90.91
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2S N = 120 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
31 NS 2T E-4 200 44 100.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 4P N-1 -50 6.7 15.23 µ Tbl = 55,08 %
Total : 774,8 / 1452 = 53,36 %
PAIRE A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
1 NS 3CcE = -530 0 0.00
2 NS 3CcW-2 300 44 100.00
3 NS 3P S+2 200 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 1P N-1 -100 23 52.27
6 NS 3S S = 400 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
7 NS 1S S+3 180 42 95.45
8 NS 2S W = -120 38 86.36
9 NS 2K N+1 110 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 4K N = 130 35 79.55
12 NS 5P W = -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
13 NS 2S E-1 100 32 72.73
14 NS 5C E-1 50 24.1 54.77
15 NS 4P S = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 59,92 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
16 NS 5PcN-2 -300 21 47.73
17 NS 6C N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 3C W-1 50 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 23 52.27
20 NS 3S W-3 300 40 90.91
21 NS 3T N+1 130 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
22 NS 5C W-2 200 38 86.36
23 NS 4P E = -620 6 13.64
24 NS 2C S = 110 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 7 15.91
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,12 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2S N = 120 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
31 NS 3K S-2 -200 6 13.64
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 4P S-1 -50 6.7 15.23 µ Tbl = 26,29 %
Total : 774,8 / 1452 = 53,36 %
PAIRE B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
1 NS 1S N-1 -50 17 38.64
2 NS 3ScS-3 -800 0 0.00
3 NS 5TcW-4 1100 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
4 NS 4C W-1 100 41 93.18
5 NS 1S S = 90 33 75.00
6 NS 3S S = 400 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 76,52 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
7 NS 1K E = -70 14 31.82
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 35 79.55
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
10 NS 650 29 65.91
11 NS 130 35 79.55
12 NS -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
13 NS 1S W-1 100 32 72.73
14 NS 4CcE = -590 0 0.00
15 NS 5P S-1 -100 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 28,03 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
16 NS 5PcN-2 -300 21 47.73
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 20.45
20 NS 2S S-2 -200 4 9.09
21 NS 3S N = 600 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
22 NS 5C W-2 200 38 86.36
23 NS 4PcW-1 200 28 63.64
24 NS 3T S+1 130 28 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 35 79.55
26 NS 3S N = 600 31 70.45
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 5K E-1 100 38 86.36
30 NS 2S N = 120 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
31 NS 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 40%60% Ajust 17.6 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 772,6 / 1452 = 53,21 %
PAIRE A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
1 NS 3CcW-2 300 43 97.73
2 NS 2S N-2 -200 10 22.73
3 NS 3P S+1 170 10 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 9.09
5 NS 2S N-2 -200 11 25.00
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 21,97 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 24 54.55
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 3S E-2 200 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 8 18.18
11 NS 3P E-2 100 23 52.27
12 NS 6P W-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
13 NS 4P W-1 100 32 72.73
14 NS 4P N = 420 41.9 95.23
15 NS 4P N+1 650 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 21 47.73
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 20.45
20 NS 3S W-3 300 40 90.91
21 NS 2C W-1 50 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
22 NS 5C W-1 100 24 54.55
23 NS 4C N+1 650 40 90.91
24 NS 2C S+1 140 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3S N = 600 31 70.45
27 NS 5K E = -400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 3S W-1 100 38 86.36
30 NS 3S S = 400 41 93.18 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
31 NS 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S = 110 17.6 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 768,5 / 1452 = 52,93 %
PAIRE a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 6 13.64
2 EO 1S N+1 120 4 9.09
3 EO 2K S+3 150 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 37,12 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 40 90.91
5 EO 2S N-2 -200 33 75.00
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 78,03 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
7 EO 2KcW = -180 42 95.45
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 4P E-2 200 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 4K N = 130 9 20.45
12 EO 5P W = -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
13 EO 2S W-2 200 2 4.55
14 EO 5K N-1 -50 29.3 66.59
15 EO 4P N+1 650 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,26 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 23 52.27
17 EO 4P N+2 480 38 86.36
18 EO 3C E = -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 21 47.73
20 EO 1P W-1 100 18 40.91
21 EO 2S N+1 150 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
22 EO 5C W-2 200 6 13.64
23 EO 4P E-1 100 23 52.27
24 EO 4T S-1 -50 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
25 EO 3S S-3 -150 38 86.36
26 EO 4P W-1 100 26 59.09
27 EO 5K E = -400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 3S E-1 100 6 13.64
30 EO 2S S-1 -50 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
31 EO 3S S-2 -200 38 86.36
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 3P S = 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 54,62 %
Total : 767,4 / 1452 = 52,85 %
PAIRE A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 29 65.91
2 NS 3S N-3 -300 5 11.36
3 NS 4P S = 420 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 2KcS-2 -500 0 0.00
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,94 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
7 NS 1K E = -70 14 31.82
8 NS 4PcS-2 -300 30 68.18
9 NS 3P W-1 100 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 8 18.18
11 NS 4K S = 130 35 79.55
12 NS 6P E-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
13 NS 1P E+3 -170 2 4.55
14 NS 5C W-1 50 24.1 54.77
15 NS 4P N+1 650 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 48,56 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
16 NS 3P N-1 -50 42 95.45
17 NS 4P N+1 450 1 2.27
18 NS 1S S+1 120 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 64,39 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 23 52.27
20 NS 2P W-1 100 26 59.09
21 NS 3P E-3 150 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
22 NS 5C W-2 200 38 86.36
23 NS 5PcE-3 800 44 100.00
24 NS 2C S+1 140 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
25 NS 3S S-3 -150 6 13.64
26 NS 4T N-1 -100 13 29.55
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,94 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
28 NS 3C W+1 -170 33 75.00
29 NS 5K E-1 100 38 86.36
30 NS 2S N+1 150 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
31 NS 3S S-2 -200 6 13.64
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 3P S = 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 45,38 %
Total : 765,0 / 1452 = 52,69 %
PAIRE A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
1 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 15.91
2 NS 3C W-1 50 26 59.09
3 NS 4P S+1 450 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 32 72.73
5 NS 2T E-2 100 37 84.09
6 NS 3S S+2 460 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,06 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
7 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 3P E = -140 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 8 18.18
11 NS 3P W-1 50 13 29.55
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
13 NS 2S W-2 200 42 95.45
14 NS 5K N-1 -50 14.7 33.41
15 NS 4P N+1 650 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,74 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
16 NS 5P N-3 -150 29 65.91
17 NS 5P N+1 480 6 13.64
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 20.45
20 NS 2K E = -90 14 31.82
21 NS 1S S+2 150 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
22 NS 5C W-2 200 38 86.36
23 NS 4C N = 620 35 79.55
24 NS 3S N = 400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3S N+1 630 40 90.91
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
28 NS 3C W+2 -200 22 50.00
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2S N-1 -50 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
31 NS 3K S = 110 36 81.82
32 NS 6S E = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 68,11 %
Total : 763,6 / 1452 = 52,59 %
PAIRE b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 15 34.09
2 EO 3T S-1 -100 24 54.55
3 EO 4P S = 420 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 40 90.91
5 EO 1S S = 90 11 25.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
7 EO 1K E = -70 30 68.18
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 20.45
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
10 EO 3S N-2 -200 44 100.00
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 40 90.91
12 EO 6P W-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 68,94 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
13 EO 1S W-1 100 12 27.27
14 EO 5PcN-2 -300 39.8 90.45
15 EO 4P N = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 55,15 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
16 EO 5C E = -650 38 86.36
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 4T S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,61 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 21 47.73
20 EO 3PcS-4 -1100 44 100.00
21 EO 1S S = 90 34 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
22 EO 5C E-1 100 20 45.45
23 EO 5C N-1 -100 28 63.64
24 EO 4P N = 420 1 2.27 µ Tbl = 37,12 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
25 EO 3S S-3 -150 38 86.36
26 EO 3S N+1 630 4 9.09
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
28 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 25.00
29 EO 3S W-1 100 6 13.64
30 EO 3S N-2 -100 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
31 EO 3S S-2 -200 38 86.36
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 3P S = 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 54,62 %
Total : 757,9 / 1452 = 52,20 %
PAIRE B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 29 65.91
2 NS 3T S = 110 35 79.55
3 NS 4P S = 420 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 67,42 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 23 52.27
6 NS 3S N+1 430 31 70.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
7 NS 1K E = -70 14 31.82
8 NS 4C E = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 2P E = -110 16 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 8 18.18
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 4 9.09
12 NS 6P E-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 37,12 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
13 NS 2P E = -110 19 43.18
14 NS 5KcN-1 Ajust 26.4 60.00
15 NS 5P N-1 -100 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 38,18 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
16 NS 4P N-1 -50 42 95.45
17 NS 6C N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 4PcE-1 100 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
19 NS 5K E = -600 23 52.27
20 NS 2K E = -90 14 31.82
21 NS 1S N+2 150 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,76 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
22 NS 5C E-1 100 24 54.55
23 NS 5C N-1 -100 16 36.36
24 NS 4P N = 420 43 97.73 µ Tbl = 62,88 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
25 NS 3S N-3 -150 6 13.64
26 NS 3PcE = -730 3 6.82
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,48 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
28 NS 2C E+3 -200 22 50.00
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2C E-3 150 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
31 NS 3T N = 110 36 81.82
32 NS 6S E = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 4P N-1 -50 6.7 15.23 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
Total : 742,1 / 1452 = 51,11 %
PAIRE B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 38 86.36
2 NS 3S N-3 -300 5 11.36
3 NS 4P S+2 480 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 64,39 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 1P N-2 -200 11 25.00
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
7 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 9.09
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 4P E-2 200 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 5P W = -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
13 NS 3S E-2 200 42 95.45
14 NS 4K N = 130 37.7 85.68
15 NS 5P S-1 -100 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 64,17 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
16 NS 5PcN-3 -500 13 29.55
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 3P E = -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 49,24 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 20.45
20 NS 2S W-2 200 33 75.00
21 NS 3T N = 110 13 29.55 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
22 NS 4C E = -620 3 6.82
23 NS 4PcE-1 200 28 63.64
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
25 NS 3S S-3 -150 6 13.64
26 NS 3S N+1 630 40 90.91
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
28 NS -120 44 100.00
29 NS -120 32 72.73
30 NS 120 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
31 NS 2K S = 90 32 72.73
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 65,08 %
Total : 741,6 / 1452 = 51,07 %
PAIRE A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 17 38.64
2 NS 4T S-1 -100 20 45.45
3 NS 4P S+1 450 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 2C S-2 -200 11 25.00
6 NS 2C S = 110 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
7 NS 1T S+2 110 34 77.27
8 NS 5C W-2 100 44 100.00
9 NS 3P W-1 100 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 8 18.18
11 NS 3P E-2 100 23 52.27
12 NS 5P W = -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
13 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 4.55
14 NS 5K N-2 -100 8.4 19.09
15 NS 2P S+3 200 10 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 21 47.73
17 NS 4P N+2 480 6 13.64
18 NS 3C E = -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
19 NS 5K E-1 100 43 97.73
20 NS 2S W-2 200 33 75.00
21 NS 3T N+1 130 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 13 29.55
23 NS 5C N-1 -100 16 36.36
24 NS 3K E-2 100 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 44 100.00
26 NS 4T N = 130 23 52.27
27 NS 4P E-2 100 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 82,58 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
28 NS 3C W+2 -200 22 50.00
29 NS 4K E = -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2S N = 120 24 54.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
31 NS 2S S-1 -100 22 50.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 739,3 / 1452 = 50,92 %
PAIRE b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
1 EO 2P S = 110 15 34.09
2 EO 3S N-3 -300 39 88.64
3 EO 4P S+1 450 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 2TcE+1 -280 40 90.91
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
7 EO 1K E = -70 30 68.18
8 EO 4C E = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 2P E = -110 28 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 44 100.00
12 EO 5P W = -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
13 EO 4P W-2 200 2 4.55
14 EO 5C E-1 50 19.9 45.23
15 EO 4P N+1 650 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 21,14 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
16 EO 5T E = -600 35 79.55
17 EO 6P N = 980 23 52.27
18 EO 4P E-1 50 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
19 EO 2K E+2 -130 8 18.18
20 EO 3S W-2 200 11 25.00
21 EO 2S S = 120 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
22 EO 4C E = -620 41 93.18
23 EO 5C N-1 -100 28 63.64
24 EO 5T S-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 20.45
26 EO 3S N = 600 13 29.55
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
28 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 25.00
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2C E-1 50 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
31 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P N = 110 26.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 735,3 / 1452 = 50,64 %
PAIRE b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 27 61.36
2 EO 3K N-1 -100 24 54.55
3 EO 2P S+3 200 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
4 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 18.18
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 21 47.73
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 26,52 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
7 EO 2K E-1 100 14 31.82
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 3P E = -140 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 36 81.82
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 40 90.91
12 EO 6P E-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 62,88 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
13 EO 3S E-2 200 2 4.55
14 EO 4K N = 130 6.3 14.32
15 EO 5P S-1 -100 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 35,83 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
16 EO 4P N-2 -100 9 20.45
17 EO 6P N = 980 23 52.27
18 EO 3CcW = -530 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 21 47.73
20 EO 2K E = -90 30 68.18
21 EO 3S S+1 630 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
22 EO 4PcN-3 -500 36 81.82
23 EO 4PcE-1 200 16 36.36
24 EO 4C S-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,39 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 4PcW-1 200 18 40.91
27 EO 5K E = -400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 5K E-1 100 6 13.64
30 EO 2S N = 120 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
31 EO 2K E-1 50 14 31.82
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 36,44 %
Total : 729,4 / 1452 = 50,23 %
PAIRE B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 17 38.64
2 NS 3K N-1 -100 20 45.45
3 NS 2P S+3 200 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 11 25.00
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
7 NS 1S N = 90 24 54.55
8 NS 5C W-1 50 41 93.18
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 3K S+1 130 35 79.55
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
13 NS 1S W-1 100 32 72.73
14 NS 5PcN-2 -300 4.2 9.55
15 NS 4P N = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 44,85 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
16 NS -300 21 47.73
17 NS 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 50 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
19 NS 3K W+1 -130 36 81.82
20 NS 3S W-4 400 44 100.00
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 2.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
22 NS 5C W-1 100 24 54.55
23 NS 5C N = 650 40 90.91
24 NS 3S N = 400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3PcW = -730 3 6.82
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 3K E+2 -150 4 9.09
30 NS 2PcW-1 100 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
31 NS 3S N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P N = 110 17.6 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 728,8 / 1452 = 50,19 %
PAIRE a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
1 EO 3K W+1 -130 34 77.27
2 EO 3T S = 110 9 20.45
3 EO 4P S = 420 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 2C S-2 -200 33 75.00
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 40 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
7 EO 1T S+1 90 20 45.45
8 EO 4C E = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 4KcN-2 -300 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 36 81.82
11 EO 4K S = 130 9 20.45
12 EO 6P E-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
13 EO 2P E = -110 25 56.82
14 EO 5P N-2 -100 35.6 80.91
15 EO 4P N+1 650 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,45 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 23 52.27
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 21 47.73
20 EO 2S W-2 200 11 25.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
22 EO 5C W-2 200 6 13.64
23 EO 4P E = -620 38 86.36
24 EO 2C S = 110 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3S N+1 630 4 9.09
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
28 EO 3C W+2 -200 22 50.00
29 EO 4K E = -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2S N = 120 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
31 EO 3T N = 110 8 18.18
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 4P S-1 -50 37.3 84.77 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
Total : 725,9 / 1452 = 49,99 %
PAIRE b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 6 13.64
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 31 70.45
3 EO 2P S+2 170 34 77.27 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 21 47.73
6 EO 3S N+1 430 13 29.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
7 EO 1S N-1 -100 40 90.91
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 4P E-2 200 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
10 EO 5P S = 650 15 34.09
11 EO 3ScN = 550 0 0.00
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
13 EO 1S W = -90 21 47.73
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 29.3 66.59
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,44 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
16 EO 4PcN-1 -100 9 20.45
17 EO 6C N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 3P E = -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
19 EO 3K E+1 -130 8 18.18
20 EO 3S W-3 300 4 9.09
21 EO 3T N = 110 31 70.45 µ Tbl = 32,58 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 31 70.45
23 EO 4PcE-1 200 16 36.36
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 20.45
26 EO 3T S = 110 24 54.55
27 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 3K E+2 -150 40 90.91
30 EO 2PcW-1 100 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
31 EO 2T E-4 200 0 0.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 4P N-1 -50 37.3 84.77 µ Tbl = 44,92 %
Total : 720,6 / 1452 = 49,63 %
PAIRE B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 29 65.91
2 NS 3T S-1 -100 20 45.45
3 NS 4P S = 420 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
4 NS 100 41 93.18
5 NS 120 43 97.73
6 NS -100 4 9.09 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
7 NS 1S N+2 150 39 88.64
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 3PcE = -730 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 4K N = 130 35 79.55
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
13 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 27.27
14 NS 5C E-1 50 24.1 54.77
15 NS 3S S = 600 13 29.55 µ Tbl = 37,20 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
16 NS 4PcN-1 -100 35 79.55
17 NS 6C N+1 1010 35 79.55
18 NS 3P E = -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
19 NS 2K E+2 -130 36 81.82
20 NS 3S W-2 200 33 75.00
21 NS 2S S = 120 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
22 NS 4PcN-3 -500 8 18.18
23 NS 4PcE-1 200 28 63.64
24 NS 4C S-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,61 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
25 NS 3S S-4 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 31 70.45
27 NS 2C N-1 -50 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 3C S-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
31 NS 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 3P S = 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 720,0 / 1452 = 49,59 %
PAIRE a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
1 EO 3CcW-2 300 1 2.27
2 EO 2S N-2 -200 34 77.27
3 EO 3P S+1 170 34 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 34 77.27
5 EO 1S N+1 120 1 2.27
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 40 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
7 EO 1S S+3 180 2 4.55
8 EO 2S W = -120 6 13.64
9 EO 2K N+1 110 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 36 81.82
11 EO 3P W-1 50 31 70.45
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
13 EO 2P E+2 -170 42 95.45
14 EO 5K N-2 -100 35.6 80.91
15 EO 2P S+3 200 34 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
16 EO 4P N-2 -100 9 20.45
17 EO 6P N = 980 23 52.27
18 EO 3K S-1 -100 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
19 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 18.18
20 EO 2K W = -90 30 68.18
21 EO 3S N = 600 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
22 EO 4C W = -620 41 93.18
23 EO 4C E = -620 38 86.36
24 EO 4P N-3 -150 40 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,15 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3S N+1 630 4 9.09
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
28 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 25.00
29 EO 5K E-1 100 6 13.64
30 EO 2S N+1 150 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
31 EO 1S N+1 120 3 6.82
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 37.3 84.77 µ Tbl = 47,20 %
Total : 715,9 / 1452 = 49,30 %
PAIRE B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
1 NS 2C E = -110 12 27.27
2 NS 3T S+1 130 42 95.45
3 NS 4P S+1 450 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 9.09
5 NS 3S E-2 100 37 84.09
6 NS 3S N+2 460 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
7 NS 1C S = 80 18 40.91
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 2P W = -110 16 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
10 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 4 9.09
12 NS 6P W-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 31,06 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
13 NS 100 32 72.73
14 NS 100 33.5 76.14
15 NS 650 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 78,41 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
16 NS 5PcN-3 -500 13 29.55
17 NS 4P N+1 450 1 2.27
18 NS 4C E-1 50 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 20.45
20 NS 2K E+1 -110 8 18.18
21 NS 4T N-1 -100 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 17,42 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
22 NS 4C W-1 100 24 54.55
23 NS 4P E = -620 6 13.64
24 NS 5T S-4 -200 1 2.27 µ Tbl = 23,48 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 35 79.55
26 NS 3T S = 110 20 45.45
27 NS 2C S-1 -50 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
28 NS 3C W+1 -170 33 75.00
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 2C E-1 50 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
31 NS 2K E-1 50 30 68.18
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 63,56 %
Total : 701,4 / 1452 = 48,31 %
PAIRE b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 6 13.64
2 EO 3S N-3 -300 39 88.64
3 EO 4P S+2 480 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 35,61 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 23 52.27
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 21 47.73
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
7 EO 1S N = 90 20 45.45
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 2P E = -110 28 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 4K N = 130 9 20.45
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
13 EO 3P E = -140 32 72.73
14 EO 4P N = 420 2.1 4.77
15 EO 4P N = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 41,74 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
16 EO 5PcN-2 -300 23 52.27
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 35 79.55
20 EO 2K E+1 -110 36 81.82
21 EO 4T N-1 -100 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 82,58 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
22 EO 5C W-1 100 20 45.45
23 EO 5C N = 650 4 9.09
24 EO 3S N = 400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
25 EO 2S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3S N+1 630 4 9.09
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 73,48 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
31 EO 3T N = 110 8 18.18
32 EO 6S E = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 4P N-1 -50 37.3 84.77 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
Total : 695,4 / 1452 = 47,89 %
PAIRE A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ.
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 22 50.00
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 20 45.45
3 NS 2K N+2 130 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 22.73
5 NS 1S N+1 120 43 97.73
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
7 NS 2KcW = -180 2 4.55
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 4P E-2 200 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 2C W-1 50 13 29.55
12 NS 4P W-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
13 NS 1S W = -90 23 52.27
14 NS 5PcN-1 -100 8.4 19.09
15 NS 4P N = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 41,21 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
16 NS 5C W+1 -680 3 6.82
17 NS 4P N+3 510 13 29.55
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 23 52.27
20 NS 2S W-2 200 33 75.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
22 NS 4C W = -620 3 6.82
23 NS 4P E-1 100 21 47.73
24 NS 2S N = 120 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 7 15.91
27 NS 3K E+2 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,12 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
28 NS 3C E+2 -200 22 50.00
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 3S N = 400 41 93.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
31 NS 2S N = 120 41 93.18
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P N+2 170 43.9 99.77 µ Tbl = 80,98 %
Total : 690,3 / 1452 = 47,54 %
PAIRE b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
1 EO 1S N-1 -50 27 61.36
2 EO 3ScS-3 -800 44 100.00
3 EO 5TcW-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 40 90.91
5 EO 3S E-2 100 7 15.91
6 EO 3S N+2 460 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
7 EO 1S N = 90 20 45.45
8 EO 5C W-1 50 3 6.82
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 2C W-2 100 21 47.73
12 EO 5P W-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 32,58 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
13 EO 4P W-1 100 12 27.27
14 EO 4P N = 420 2.1 4.77
15 EO 4P N = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 26,59 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
16 EO 4P N-1 -50 2 4.55
17 EO 6C N+1 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 4PcE-1 100 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
19 EO 5K E-1 100 1 2.27
20 EO 1P W-1 100 18 40.91
21 EO 2S S = 120 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 31 70.45
23 EO 2C N+3 200 16 36.36
24 EO 6T S-4 -200 43 97.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 2 4.55
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 31 70.45
27 EO 5K E = -400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 3C S-3 -300 44 100.00
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
31 EO 3S S-2 -200 38 86.36
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P N = 110 26.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,45 %
Total : 676,5 / 1452 = 46,59 %
PAIRE B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
1 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 15.91
2 NS 3T S = 110 35 79.55
3 NS 4P S+1 450 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 9.09
5 NS 1S S = 90 33 75.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
7 NS -90 8 18.18
8 NS 50 41 93.18
9 NS -110 16 36.36 µ Tbl = 49,24 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 2C W-1 50 13 29.55
12 NS 5P E = -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
13 NS 3P E = -140 12 27.27
14 NS 4P N = 420 41.9 95.23
15 NS 4P N = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 58,26 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
16 NS 5P S-3 -150 29 65.91
17 NS 4P N+2 480 6 13.64
18 NS 3P E-1 50 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,76 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
19 NS 3K E+1 -130 36 81.82
20 NS 3S W-3 300 40 90.91
21 NS 3T N = 110 13 29.55 µ Tbl = 67,42 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
22 NS 4C E = -620 3 6.82
23 NS 5C N-1 -100 16 36.36
24 NS 5T S-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 4PcW-1 200 26 59.09
27 NS 5K E = -400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 4PcW-2 300 36 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
31 NS 3S S-2 -200 6 13.64
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P N = 110 17.6 40.00 µ Tbl = 34,55 %
Total : 674,5 / 1452 = 46,45 %
PAIRE B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
1 NS 1S N-1 -50 17 38.64
2 NS 3CcW-1 100 29 65.91
3 NS 4P S = 420 25 56.82 µ Tbl = 53,79 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 23 52.27
6 NS 3S S+2 460 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 24 54.55
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 3PcE-1 200 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
10 NS 5P S = 650 29 65.91
11 NS 3ScN = 550 44 100.00
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 12 27.27
14 NS 5K N-1 -50 14.7 33.41
15 NS 5P N-1 -100 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 24,02 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
16 NS 4P N-2 -100 35 79.55
17 NS 6P N = 980 21 47.73
18 NS 3CcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
19 NS 5KcW = -750 0 0.00
20 NS 2T N = 90 22 50.00
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 2.27 µ Tbl = 17,42 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 13 29.55
23 NS 2C N+3 200 28 63.64
24 NS 6T S-4 -200 1 2.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 35 79.55
26 NS 3S N = 600 31 70.45
27 NS 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
28 NS 2C E+2 -170 33 75.00
29 NS 3S W-1 100 38 86.36
30 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
31 NS -200 6 13.64
32 NS Ajust 26.4 60.00
33 NS Ajust 26.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 44,55 %
Total : 673,5 / 1452 = 46,38 %
PAIRE b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
1 EO 2C E+1 -140 37 84.09
2 EO 3T S = 110 9 20.45
3 EO 4P S+1 450 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
4 EO 4C W-1 100 3 6.82
5 EO 1S S = 90 11 25.00
6 EO 3S S = 400 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 23,48 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
7 EO 1C S = 80 26 59.09
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 2P W = -110 28 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
10 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
11 EO 3K N+1 130 9 20.45
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
13 EO 2P E+1 -140 32 72.73
14 EO 5C E-1 50 19.9 45.23
15 EO 4P N = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 55,23 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 23 52.27
17 EO 5C S+2 510 31 70.45
18 EO 3P E = -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
B10 CARPENTIER Frédéric -KURGAN Daniel 51,11 %
19 EO 5K E = -600 21 47.73
20 EO 2K E = -90 30 68.18
21 EO 1S N+2 150 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 49,24 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
22 EO 4C E = -620 41 93.18
23 EO 4PcE-1 200 16 36.36
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 20.45
26 EO 3S N = 600 13 29.55
27 EO 4K E+1 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
28 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 25.00
29 EO 3C S-2 -200 42 95.45
30 EO 3S N = 400 3 6.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
31 EO 3T N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 3P S = 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 672,0 / 1452 = 46,28 %
PAIRE b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline
B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale 43,64 %
1 EO -300 42 95.45
2 EO -140 31 70.45
3 EO 400 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
B.1 KAPLAN Alain -Bigdeli Faramarz 49,59 %
4 EO 100 3 6.82
5 EO 120 1 2.27
6 EO -100 40 90.91 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.7 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 46,45 %
7 EO -90 36 81.82
8 EO 50 3 6.82
9 EO -110 28 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,76 %
B.2 ROOBAERT Willy -YORDANOV Jordan 53,21 %
10 EO 650 15 34.09
11 EO 130 9 20.45
12 EO -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
B.8 KATILA Tina -DE WITTE Anne 48,31 %
13 EO 100 12 27.27
14 EO 100 10.5 23.86
15 EO 650 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 21,59 %
B.3 STUYCK Dominique -Bahbout Sam 50,19 %
16 EO -300 23 52.27
17 EO 1010 9 20.45
18 EO 50 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.9 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond 53,36 %
19 EO -600 21 47.73
20 EO -200 40 90.91
21 EO 120 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre 43,86 %
22 EO 200 6 13.64
23 EO -850 44 100.00
24 EO 400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
B12 DEWASME Isabelle -DEHAYE Bernard 56,39 %
25 EO -50 9 20.45
26 EO -100 31 70.45
27 EO -400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
B.5 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DEVIGNE Alain 51,07 %
28 EO -120 0 0.00
29 EO -120 12 27.27
30 EO 120 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
B11 Pieters Mark -Peeters Ivan 46,38 %
31 EO -200 38 86.36
32 EO Ajust 17.6 40.00
33 EO Ajust 17.6 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,45 %
Total : 661,7 / 1452 = 45,57 %
PAIRE A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 29 65.91
2 NS 3T S = 110 35 79.55
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
4 NS 2S W+2 -180 34 77.27
5 NS 2P N = 110 40 90.91
6 NS 1CxN+2 920 44 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
7 NS 1T S+1 90 24 54.55
8 NS 4C E = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 4KcN-2 -300 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 9.09
12 NS 5P W = -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
13 NS 2P E+1 -140 12 27.27
14 NS 5CcE-1 100 33.5 76.14
15 NS 3S S = 600 13 29.55 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
16 NS 4P N-2 -100 35 79.55
17 NS 4P N+3 510 13 29.55
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 20.45
20 NS 1P W = -80 20 45.45
21 NS 1S N+2 150 30 68.18 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 13 29.55
23 NS 4P E = -620 6 13.64
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 20 45.45
26 NS 3S N+1 630 40 90.91
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 33 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 3S E-1 100 38 86.36
30 NS 2S S-1 -50 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
31 NS 3S N-2 -200 6 13.64
32 NS 6S E = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 4P S-1 -50 6.7 15.23 µ Tbl = 26,29 %
Total : 654,2 / 1452 = 45,06 %
PAIRE B.4 CYPRES Suzanne -VIOT Alexandre
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 38 86.36
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 13 29.55
3 NS 2P S+2 170 10 22.73 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 2TcE+1 -280 4 9.09
6 NS 3S S+2 460 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
7 NS 2K E-1 100 30 68.18
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 3P E = -140 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 8 18.18
11 NS 2C W-1 50 13 29.55
12 NS 6P W-1 50 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
13 NS 4P W-1 100 32 72.73
14 NS 4P N = 420 41.9 95.23
15 NS 4P N = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 73,41 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 21 47.73
17 NS 5C S+2 510 13 29.55
18 NS 3P E = -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 23 52.27
20 NS 3PcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
21 NS 1S S = 90 10 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
22 NS 200 38 86.36
23 NS -850 0 0.00
24 NS 400 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
25 NS 3S S-3 -150 6 13.64
26 NS 3S N+1 630 40 90.91
27 NS 5K E = -400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
b.9 COUVREUR Daniel -STEED Adrian 47,89 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 9 20.45
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 40.91
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 26,52 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
31 NS 3K S-2 -200 6 13.64
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 45,38 %
Total : 636,8 / 1452 = 43,86 %
PAIRE B.6 de VILLENFAGNE DE VOGELSA-ORTEGAT Pascale
b11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -CUVELLIEZ Caroline 45,57 %
1 NS -300 2 4.55
2 NS -140 13 29.55
3 NS 400 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
b10 SPINDEL Jean-Paul -HOCQ Daniel 53,86 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 9.09
5 NS 2C S-3 -300 2 4.55
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
b12 KUNKERA Nathalie -DE LIEDEKERKE Tanguy 53,61 %
7 NS 1C S+1 110 34 77.27
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 31.82
9 NS 3P E-2 200 37 84.09 µ Tbl = 64,39 %
b.8 MARINOF Nicolas -VINGERHOETS Luc 54,21 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 29 65.91
11 NS 2K N+2 130 35 79.55
12 NS 5P W = -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b.7 MOMMAERTS Laure -Van Den Hove Wouter 49,63 %
13 NS 1S W = -90 23 52.27
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 14.7 33.41
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,56 %
b.6 DUREN-ROSMAN Françoise -CHIF Alain 50,64 %
16 NS 5T E = -600 9 20.45
17 NS 6P N = 980 21 47.73
18 NS 4P E-1 50 32 72.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
b.5 CLAEYS Yves -LEMAIRE Eric 50,23 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 23 52.27
20 NS 2K E = -90 14 31.82
21 NS 3S S+1 630 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
b.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 55,72 %
22 NS 5C W-1 100 24 54.55
23 NS 4P E = -620 6 13.64
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 11 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,06 %
b.3 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques 46,59 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 42 95.45
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 13 29.55
27 NS 5K E = -400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 46,21 %
b.2 GILLES Patrick -FALLA Marianne 46,28 %
28 NS 3C W+1 -170 33 75.00
29 NS 3C S-2 -200 2 4.55
30 NS 3S N = 400 41 93.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
b.1 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 52,20 %
31 NS 3S S-2 -200 6 13.64
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 3P S = 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 45,38 %
Total : 633,6 / 1452 = 43,64 %
PAIRE a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 15 34.09
2 EO 3S N-3 -300 39 88.64
3 EO 4P S = 420 19 43.18 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
4 EO 4C W-1 100 3 6.82
5 EO 2T N-1 -100 21 47.73
6 EO 6T S-2 -100 40 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 20 45.45
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 3S E-2 200 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 2C W-1 50 31 70.45
12 EO 4P W-1 50 7 15.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
13 EO 2S E-1 100 12 27.27
14 EO 5C E-1 50 19.9 45.23
15 EO 4P S = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 40,08 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
16 EO 5P N-3 -150 15 34.09
17 EO 5P N+1 480 38 86.36
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
19 EO 5K E-1 100 1 2.27
20 EO 2S W-2 200 11 25.00
21 EO 3T N+1 130 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
22 EO 5C W-2 200 6 13.64
23 EO 4C N+1 650 4 9.09
24 EO 3C S = 140 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 20.45
26 EO 4T N = 130 21 47.73
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
28 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 25.00
29 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 42 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
31 EO 3S N-2 -200 38 86.36
32 EO 6S E = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 4P S-1 -50 37.3 84.77 µ Tbl = 73,71 %
Total : 621,2 / 1452 = 42,78 %
PAIRE a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 27 61.36
2 EO 4T S-1 -100 24 54.55
3 EO 4P S+1 450 8 18.18 µ Tbl = 44,70 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
4 EO 4C W-1 100 3 6.82
5 EO 2K W = -90 14 31.82
6 EO 3S S+1 430 13 29.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
7 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 4C W = -420 30 68.18
9 EO 3PcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 36 81.82
11 EO 2C W-1 50 31 70.45
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
13 EO 2P E+1 -140 32 72.73
14 EO 5CcE-1 100 10.5 23.86
15 EO 3S S = 600 31 70.45 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
16 EO 3P N-1 -50 2 4.55
17 EO 4P N+1 450 43 97.73
18 EO 1S S+1 120 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 35,61 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
19 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 18.18
20 EO 2K E = -90 30 68.18
21 EO 2KcE-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
22 EO 5C W-1 100 20 45.45
23 EO 4C N+1 650 4 9.09
24 EO 2C S+1 140 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 54.55
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 37 84.09
27 EO 3K E+2 -150 22 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,88 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 2S N = 120 20 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
31 EO 3K S = 110 8 18.18
32 EO 6S E = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 31,89 %
Total : 615,6 / 1452 = 42,40 %
PAIRE a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
1 EO 1S N-3 -150 40 90.91
2 EO 2P E-2 100 15 34.09
3 EO 3K S+2 150 39 88.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
4 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 22.73
5 EO 2P N = 110 4 9.09
6 EO 1CxN+2 920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
7 EO 1K E = -70 30 68.18
8 EO 4PcS-2 -300 14 31.82
9 EO 3P W-1 100 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 3P W-2 100 21 47.73
12 EO 5P W = -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 49,24 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
13 EO 4P W-1 100 12 27.27
14 EO 4P N = 420 2.1 4.77
15 EO 4P N+1 650 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
16 EO 5C W+1 -680 41 93.18
17 EO 4P N+3 510 31 70.45
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 38 86.36 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 21 47.73
20 EO 3S W-3 300 4 9.09
21 EO 3T N+1 130 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
22 EO 5C W-2 200 6 13.64
23 EO 4C N = 620 9 20.45
24 EO 3S N = 400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
26 EO 4T N = 130 21 47.73
27 EO 4P E-2 100 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 17,42 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
28 EO 4C W+1 -450 44 100.00
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 26 59.09
30 EO 3S N = 400 3 6.82 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
31 EO 3C W = -140 30 68.18
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P S+1 140 12.1 27.50 µ Tbl = 48,56 %
Total : 592,2 / 1452 = 40,79 %
PAIRE A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine
a.8 LEMAIGRE Bénédicte -QUIEVY Bruno 40,79 %
1 NS 1S N-3 -150 4 9.09
2 NS 2P E-2 100 29 65.91
3 NS 3K S+2 150 5 11.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
a.7 WILDIERS Lydia -JAMIN Georges 49,99 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21 47.73
5 NS 2C S-2 -200 11 25.00
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 MARECHAL Nicole -SCHOOFS Jean Arnold 58,33 %
7 NS 1K E+1 -90 8 18.18
8 NS 2S W+3 -210 32 72.73
9 NS 3P E-1 100 26 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 DEMARTY Chantal -DEMARTY Jean-Luc 42,40 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 8 18.18
11 NS 2C W-1 50 13 29.55
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 15 34.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 DUBOIS Claire -POLET Patrick 53,39 %
13 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 13.64
14 NS 4C E = -420 2.1 4.77
15 NS 4P N = 620 23 52.27 µ Tbl = 23,56 %
a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France 33,33 %
16 NS 4P N-1 -50 42 95.45
17 NS 6P N = 980 21 47.73
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 38.64 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.2 VANDEN BOSSCHE Caroline -Van Middelem Guy 64,94 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 4.55
20 NS 3T N-2 -200 4 9.09
21 NS 2P E = -110 4 9.09 µ Tbl = 7,58 %
a.1 ZEIMES Annie -VACCAREZZA Rose-Marie 49,30 %
22 NS 4C W = -620 3 6.82
23 NS 4C E = -620 6 13.64
24 NS 4P N-3 -150 4 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,85 %
a11 PLETSER Olga -LAFOURCADE Eloïse 52,85 %
25 NS 3S S-3 -150 6 13.64
26 NS 4P W-1 100 18 40.91
27 NS 5K E = -400 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 DELLA FAILLE Diane -BEHAGHEL Elie 42,78 %
28 NS 3C W+1 -170 33 75.00
29 NS 3S E-2 200 44 100.00
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
a.9 JOURDAIN Jean-François -LIEGEOIS Olivier 54,80 %
31 NS 1S N-1 -100 22 50.00
32 NS 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 NS 2P S+1 140 31.9 72.50 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 495,0 / 1452 = 34,09 %
PAIRE a.3 NELIS Anne -NIVELLE France
A.2 BOLLE Michel -RENARD Claude 53,36 %
1 EO 3CcE = -530 44 100.00
2 EO 3CcW-2 300 0 0.00
3 EO 3P S+2 200 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
A.8 CARAKEHIAN Julia -de WASSEIGE Ariane 52,59 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 12 27.27
5 EO 2T E-2 100 7 15.91
6 EO 3S S+2 460 6 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,94 %
A.3 VERBRUGGEN Nicole -EFIRA Arthur 50,92 %
7 EO 1T S+2 110 10 22.73
8 EO 5C W-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 3P W-1 100 18 40.91 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.9 GELIBTER Bernadette -GELIBTER Daniel 56,42 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 15 34.09
11 EO 2K N+2 130 9 20.45
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 29 65.91 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
A.4 SCHELLEKENS Caroline -DUBOIS Daniel 56,13 %
13 EO 1S W-1 100 12 27.27
14 EO 5C E-1 50 19.9 45.23
15 EO 4P N = 620 21 47.73 µ Tbl = 40,08 %
A10 CHAMPAGNE Isabelle -LORQUET Christine 34,09 %
16 EO 4P N-1 -50 2 4.55
17 EO 6P N = 980 23 52.27
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 61.36 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A.5 NOACH Sophie -MEERT Christian 45,06 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 35 79.55
20 EO 1P W = -80 24 54.55
21 EO 1S N+2 150 14 31.82 µ Tbl = 55,30 %
A11 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique 52,69 %
22 EO 5C W-2 200 6 13.64
23 EO 5PcE-3 800 0 0.00
24 EO 2C S+1 140 12 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.6 COUTEAUX Antonella -HUNTZ Hervé 55,38 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 20.45
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 31 70.45
27 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
A.1 CLAESSENS Jerôme -BARRO Chantal 52,93 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 35 79.55
29 EO 3S W-1 100 6 13.64
30 EO 3S S = 400 3 6.82 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 Buelens Mady -van den HOVE d'E.Christ. 47,54 %
31 EO 2S N = 120 3 6.82
32 EO 6S W = -1440 22 50.00
33 EO 2P N+2 170 0.1 0.23 µ Tbl = 19,02 %
Total : 484,0 / 1452 = 33,33 %
|