B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 58,27 A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren
--- 2 57,04 A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital
--- 3 56,19 A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand
--- 4 55,61 A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret
--- 5 53,44 A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 6 51,53 A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur
--- 7 50,95 A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 8 33,33 A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary
--- 9 33,27 A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 55,24 a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval
--- 2 54,76 a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 3 53,60 a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 4 53,07 a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 5 53,07 a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems
--- 6 45,86 a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym
--- 7 45,21 a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
--- 8 39,40 a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre
--- 9 0,00 a.6 -
PAIRE A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
1 NS 4T W-2 100 9.3 66.43
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 4.7 33.57
3 NS 2C S+1 140 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
4 NS 2C S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
5 NS 6PcN+1 1860 12.7 90.71
6 NS 4PcW-1 200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
7 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.6 25.71
8 NS 4C N-2 -100 4.7 33.57
9 NS 3S N+3 490 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
10 NS 2P W = -110 13 92.86
11 NS 5T N = 400 8 57.14
12 NS 3P W = -140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.6 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
16 NS 3S E = -600 1.3 9.29
17 NS 4P W-1 50 12.7 90.71
18 NS 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.3 66.43
21 NS 3P N = 140 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
22 NS 5KcN-1 -100 1.3 9.29
23 NS 1S W-2 200 12.7 90.71
24 NS 3K E-1 50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
Total : 171,3 / 294 = 58,27 %
PAIRE A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
1 NS 4P N-2 -100 3.6 25.71
2 NS 2P S = 110 11.6 82.86
3 NS 2C S = 110 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
4 NS 2P S+1 140 13.9 99.29
5 NS 6P N = 1430 2.4 17.14
6 NS 4C N+1 450 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 9.3 66.43
8 NS 3T N = 110 11.6 82.86
9 NS 3S S+2 460 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
10 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
11 NS 5TcN = 550 13 92.86
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.3 66.43
21 NS 3P N = 140 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
22 NS 5C E-3 300 11.6 82.86
23 NS 1S W = -90 0.1 0.71
24 NS 2P N = 110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.6 25.71
26 NS 1P E+1 -110 3.6 25.71
27 NS 4C W+2 -480 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 167,7 / 294 = 57,04 %
PAIRE A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 13.9 99.29
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 4.7 33.57
3 NS 2C S-2 -100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
7 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.6 25.71
8 NS 4C N-2 -100 4.7 33.57
9 NS 4S N+2 490 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
10 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57
11 NS 4KcN = 510 10 71.43
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
13 NS 2S N = 120 10.4 74.29
14 NS 3S N+3 490 11.6 82.86
15 NS 2T W = -90 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
16 NS 3S E-1 100 10.4 74.29
17 NS 2P W+3 -200 7 50.00
18 NS 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.3 66.43
21 NS 5TcE-3 500 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
22 NS 5C E-2 200 7 50.00
23 NS 1S W-2 200 12.7 90.71
24 NS 2K E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.6 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 165,2 / 294 = 56,19 %
PAIRE A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
1 NS 4P N-2 -100 3.6 25.71
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 4.7 33.57
3 NS 2C S = 110 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
4 NS 2P S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 8.1 57.86
6 NS 4C N+1 450 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 57,86 %
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
7 NS 1S E-1 100 13.9 99.29
8 NS 3PcE-1 100 9.3 66.43
9 NS 3S S+3 490 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
10 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
11 NS 3P E = -140 2 14.29
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
13 NS 2S N-1 -100 5.9 42.14
14 NS 3S S+3 490 11.6 82.86
15 NS 3C S = 140 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.71
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.3 66.43
21 NS 3P N = 140 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.6 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.71
26 NS 2C S+2 170 13.9 99.29
27 NS 4C W+2 -480 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 163,5 / 294 = 55,61 %
PAIRE A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.6 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
4 NS 2P S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
5 NS 6P N = 1430 2.4 17.14
6 NS 4C N+1 450 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 44,29 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 9.3 66.43
8 NS 3C N = 140 13.9 99.29
9 NS 4C N+2 480 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
10 NS 3C W = -140 8 57.14
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 14.29
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
13 NS 2T N-2 -200 1.3 9.29
14 NS 3S S+1 430 1.3 9.29
15 NS 3T W-3 150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
16 NS 3S E = -600 1.3 9.29
17 NS 4P W = -420 3.6 25.71
18 NS 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
22 NS 4C E-3 300 11.6 82.86
23 NS 1S W-1 100 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3K E-1 50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
25 NS 2S E-1 100 11.6 82.86
26 NS 2C S = 110 11.6 82.86
27 NS 4C W+2 -480 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 157,1 / 294 = 53,44 %
PAIRE A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
4 NS 2K E+1 -110 2.4 17.14
5 NS 6P N = 1430 2.4 17.14
6 NS 4C N+1 450 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 9.3 66.43
8 NS 4C N-2 -100 4.7 33.57
9 NS 6S N-1 -50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
10 NS 3C W+1 -170 1 7.14
11 NS 5TcN = 550 13 92.86
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
13 NS 2S N+1 150 13.9 99.29
14 NS 3S S+3 490 11.6 82.86
15 NS 1S S+1 120 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
16 NS 3S E-1 100 10.4 74.29
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 9.3 66.43
18 NS 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.6 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
22 NS 5K N-1 -50 4.7 33.57
23 NS 2C W-1 100 5.9 42.14
24 NS 2P S = 110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
25 NS 2P W = -110 9.3 66.43
26 NS 2P W-1 100 9.3 66.43
27 NS 6C W = -980 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 151,5 / 294 = 51,53 %
PAIRE A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
1 NS 3K S = 110 11.6 82.86
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 4.7 33.57
3 NS 2C S = 110 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
4 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.71
5 NS 6PcN+1 1860 12.7 90.71
6 NS 5C N = 450 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
7 NS 4P W+2 -680 0.1 0.71
8 NS 3P E = -140 0.1 0.71
9 NS 3S S+3 490 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 25,24 %
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
13 NS 2S N = 120 10.4 74.29
14 NS 3S S+2 460 5.9 42.14
15 NS 2T W = -90 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
16 NS 3S E-2 200 13.9 99.29
17 NS 4P W-1 50 12.7 90.71
18 NS 5P S+2 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.3 66.43
21 NS 4P N-1 -100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
22 NS 4P W-3 300 11.6 82.86
23 NS 1S W-1 100 5.9 42.14
24 NS 2K E+1 -110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 7 50.00
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 7 50.00
27 NS 4C W+2 -480 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 171,2 / 336 = 50,95 %
PAIRE A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
1 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 NS 4P S-2 -200 4.7 33.57
3 NS 3S S-3 -150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.6 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
10 NS 2C W = -110 13 92.86
11 NS 3P E-1 50 6 42.86
12 NS 2P W+3 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
13 NS 3S N-2 -200 1.3 9.29
14 NS 3S N+2 460 5.9 42.14
15 NS 2T W = -90 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
16 NS 2S E = -120 7 50.00
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 0.1 0.71
18 NS 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,60 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
20 NS 3S W = -600 1.3 9.29
21 NS 4P N-1 -100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
22 NS 5KcN-1 -100 1.3 9.29
23 NS 1S W-1 100 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3K E = -110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
25 NS 2C N = 110 13.9 99.29
26 NS 2P E = -110 3.6 25.71
27 NS 4S W+2 -490 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
Total : 98,0 / 294 = 33,33 %
PAIRE A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans
a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre 39,40 %
1 NS 2T W+1 -110 0.1 0.71
2 NS 4P S = 620 13.9 99.29
3 NS 2C S = 110 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 45,21 %
4 NS 2P S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 8.1 57.86
6 NS 4C N+1 450 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 57,86 %
a.6 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,07 %
10 NS 2C W+2 -170 1 7.14
11 NS 3P E = -140 2 14.29
12 NS 3P W+2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym 45,86 %
13 NS 2S N-1 -100 5.9 42.14
14 NS 3S N+1 430 1.3 9.29
15 NS 2T W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval 55,24 %
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 4.7 33.57
17 NS 4P W = -420 3.6 25.71
18 NS 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,76 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
20 NS 3S E = -600 1.3 9.29
21 NS 4P N-1 -100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 53,07 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.6 25.71
26 NS 3P E = -140 0.1 0.71
27 NS 4C W+3 -510 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
Total : 97,8 / 294 = 33,27 %
PAIRE a.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Mouche Deleval
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
4 EO 2P S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5.9 42.14
6 EO 4C N+1 450 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 42,14 %
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
7 EO 4P W+1 -650 10.4 74.29
8 EO 4C N-2 -100 9.3 66.43
9 EO 4S N+2 490 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
10 EO 3C W = -140 6 42.86
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 85.71
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
13 EO 3S N-2 -200 12.7 90.71
14 EO 3S N+2 460 8.1 57.86
15 EO 2T W = -90 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 9.3 66.43
17 EO 4P W = -420 10.4 74.29
18 EO 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 4.7 33.57
21 EO 4P N-1 -100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
22 EO 5KcN-1 -100 12.7 90.71
23 EO 1S W-2 200 1.3 9.29
24 EO 3K E-1 50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 10.4 74.29
26 EO 1P E+1 -110 10.4 74.29
27 EO 4C W+2 -480 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 185,6 / 336 = 55,24 %
PAIRE a.2 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
1 EO 4P N-2 -100 10.4 74.29
2 EO 2P S = 110 2.4 17.14
3 EO 2C S = 110 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
4 EO 2K E+1 -110 11.6 82.86
5 EO 6P N = 1430 11.6 82.86
6 EO 4C N+1 450 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
7 EO 1S E-1 100 0.1 0.71
8 EO 3PcE-1 100 4.7 33.57
9 EO 3S S+3 490 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
10 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43
11 EO 4KcN = 510 4 28.57
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
13 EO 2T N-2 -200 12.7 90.71
14 EO 3S S+1 430 12.7 90.71
15 EO 3T W-3 150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
16 EO 2S E = -120 7 50.00
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 13.9 99.29
18 EO 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
20 EO 3S E = -600 12.7 90.71
21 EO 4P N-1 -100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
22 EO 4P W-3 300 2.4 17.14
23 EO 1S W-1 100 8.1 57.86
24 EO 2K E+1 -110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
Total : 184,0 / 336 = 54,76 %
PAIRE a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
1 EO 4T W-2 100 4.7 33.57
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 9.3 66.43
3 EO 2C S+1 140 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
4 EO 2P S+1 140 0.1 0.71
5 EO 6P N = 1430 11.6 82.86
6 EO 4C N+1 450 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 4.7 33.57
8 EO 4C N-2 -100 9.3 66.43
9 EO 6S N-1 -50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
10 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
11 EO 3P E = -140 12 85.71
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
13 EO 2S N = 120 3.6 25.71
14 EO 3S N+3 490 2.4 17.14
15 EO 2T W = -90 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
16 EO 3S E = -600 12.7 90.71
17 EO 4P W = -420 10.4 74.29
18 EO 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
20 EO 3S W = -600 12.7 90.71
21 EO 4P N-1 -100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 7 50.00
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 7 50.00
27 EO 4C W+2 -480 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 180,1 / 336 = 53,60 %
PAIRE a.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 0.1 0.71
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 9.3 66.43
3 EO 2C S-2 -100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
4 EO 2P S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
5 EO 6P N = 1430 11.6 82.86
6 EO 4C N+1 450 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 55,71 %
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
10 EO 2C W+2 -170 13 92.86
11 EO 3P E = -140 12 85.71
12 EO 3P W+2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
13 EO 2S N = 120 3.6 25.71
14 EO 3S S+2 460 8.1 57.86
15 EO 2T W = -90 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
16 EO 3S E = -600 12.7 90.71
17 EO 4P W-1 50 1.3 9.29
18 EO 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 4.7 33.57
21 EO 3P N = 140 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
22 EO 5K N-1 -50 9.3 66.43
23 EO 2C W-1 100 8.1 57.86
24 EO 2P S = 110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 13.9 99.29
26 EO 2C S+2 170 0.1 0.71
27 EO 4C W+2 -480 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 178,3 / 336 = 53,07 %
PAIRE a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
1 EO 3K S = 110 2.4 17.14
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 9.3 66.43
3 EO 2C S = 110 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
4 EO 2C S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
5 EO 6PcN+1 1860 1.3 9.29
6 EO 4PcW-1 200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 4.7 33.57
8 EO 3T N = 110 2.4 17.14
9 EO 3S S+2 460 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
10 EO 3C W+1 -170 13 92.86
11 EO 5TcN = 550 1 7.14
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
13 EO 2S N-1 -100 8.1 57.86
14 EO 3S S+3 490 2.4 17.14
15 EO 3C S = 140 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
16 EO 3S E-1 100 3.6 25.71
17 EO 2P W+3 -200 7 50.00
18 EO 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
22 EO 5KcN-1 -100 12.7 90.71
23 EO 1S W-1 100 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3K E = -110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 10.4 74.29
26 EO 3P E = -140 13.9 99.29
27 EO 4C W+3 -510 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
Total : 178,3 / 336 = 53,07 %
PAIRE a.4 Christiane Huby -Dilva Haym
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
1 EO 4P N-2 -100 10.4 74.29
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 9.3 66.43
3 EO 2C S = 110 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 4.7 33.57
8 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.71
9 EO 4C N+2 480 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
10 EO 2C W = -110 1 7.14
11 EO 3P E-1 50 8 57.14
12 EO 2P W+3 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
13 EO 2S N-1 -100 8.1 57.86
14 EO 3S N+1 430 12.7 90.71
15 EO 2T W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
16 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.71
17 EO 4P W-1 50 1.3 9.29
18 EO 5P S+2 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 4.7 33.57
21 EO 3P N = 140 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
22 EO 5C E-3 300 2.4 17.14
23 EO 1S W = -90 13.9 99.29
24 EO 2P N = 110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
25 EO 2P W = -110 4.7 33.57
26 EO 2P W-1 100 4.7 33.57
27 EO 6C W = -980 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 154,1 / 336 = 45,86 %
PAIRE a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
1 EO 4P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 EO 4P S-2 -200 9.3 66.43
3 EO 3S S-3 -150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
4 EO 2P S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5.9 42.14
6 EO 4C N+1 450 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 42,14 %
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
7 EO 4P W+2 -680 13.9 99.29
8 EO 3P E = -140 13.9 99.29
9 EO 3S S+3 490 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 74,76 %
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
10 EO 2P W = -110 1 7.14
11 EO 5T N = 400 6 42.86
12 EO 3P W = -140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
16 EO 3S E-1 100 3.6 25.71
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 4.7 33.57
18 EO 4P S+3 710 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 13.9 99.29
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 4.7 33.57
21 EO 3P N = 140 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
22 EO 5C E-2 200 7 50.00
23 EO 1S W-2 200 1.3 9.29
24 EO 2K E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
25 EO 2S E-1 100 2.4 17.14
26 EO 2C S = 110 2.4 17.14
27 EO 4C W+2 -480 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 151,9 / 336 = 45,21 %
PAIRE a.8 Anne France Raquez -Olivier Paternostre
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
1 EO 2T W+1 -110 13.9 99.29
2 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.71
3 EO 2C S = 110 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.5 Nicole Leclere -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,95 %
4 EO 1S W+1 -120 13.9 99.29
5 EO 6PcN+1 1860 1.3 9.29
6 EO 5C N = 450 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
7 EO 4P W+1 -650 10.4 74.29
8 EO 4C N-2 -100 9.3 66.43
9 EO 3S N+3 490 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
10 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
11 EO 5TcN = 550 1 7.14
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
13 EO 2S N+1 150 0.1 0.71
14 EO 3S S+3 490 2.4 17.14
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 4.7 33.57
21 EO 5TcE-3 500 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
22 EO 4C E-3 300 2.4 17.14
23 EO 1S W-1 100 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3K E-1 50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
25 EO 2C N = 110 0.1 0.71
26 EO 2P E = -110 10.4 74.29
27 EO 4S W+2 -490 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 132,4 / 336 = 39,40 %
PAIRE a.6 -
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,44 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Paul Gatel -Myriam de Timary 33,33 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 33,27 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Lydia Wildiers -Francoise Duren 58,27 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Florence Vital 57,04 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 51,53 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Caroll Pucher -Genevieve Chetret 55,61 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Teresa Dekoster -Annie Legrand 56,19 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 378 = 0,00 %
|