B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 65,12 B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie
--- 2 61,90 C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie
--- 3 61,86 C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain
--- 4 61,67 a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis
--- 5 58,96 b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle
--- 6 58,64 B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan
--- 7 58,63 C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange
--- 8 58,50 A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel
--- 9 57,80 C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc
--- 10 57,30 A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy
--- 11 56,04 A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
--- 12 55,10 C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi
--- 13 54,59 B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul
--- 14 54,36 a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel
--- 15 54,07 a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan
--- 16 53,75 b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre
--- 17 53,60 B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine
--- 18 52,90 a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel
--- 19 52,84 C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre
--- 20 52,54 C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric
--- 21 52,34 B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel
--- 22 52,29 A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela
--- 23 52,26 A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar
--- 24 51,71 b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain
--- 25 50,81 C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David
--- 26 50,70 B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia
--- 27 49,90 C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique
--- 28 49,88 b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain
--- 29 49,39 b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire
--- 30 49,11 A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian
--- 31 48,77 a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
--- 32 47,91 C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina
--- 33 46,57 a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo
--- 34 46,50 b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno
--- 35 46,39 C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick
--- 36 46,36 B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise
--- 37 45,96 C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga
--- 38 45,60 B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal
--- 39 45,46 C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline
--- 40 45,09 a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel
--- 41 44,52 a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
--- 42 44,40 a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole
--- 43 44,23 A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine
--- 44 43,52 b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry
--- 45 43,22 C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette
--- 46 42,95 B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean
--- 47 41,48 A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela
--- 48 40,64 C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit
--- 49 39,87 b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan
--- 50 36,53 b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric
--- 51 35,69 A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter
--- 52 29,04 C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan
PAIRE B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
1 NS 3P E = -140 23 46.00
2 NS 3C W-3 150 29 58.00
3 NS 2P N+1 140 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3PcE = -530 4 8.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 37,33 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 50 100.00
8 NS 6C N = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 80,87 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 42 84.00
11 NS 4K S-1 -50 15 30.00
12 NS 2P S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
13 NS 3P N = 140 29 58.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 47 94.00
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
16 NS 3S N+3 490 49 98.00
17 NS 4C W-1 50 47 94.00
18 NS 3C W-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
19 NS 5C N+1 480 32 64.00
20 NS 5K W = -600 30 60.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 68,67 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
22 NS 3C E-2 200 40 80.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 12 24.00
24 NS 2S S+2 180 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 62,67 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 3C N = 140 21 42.00
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 44.8 89.60 µ Tbl = 67,20 %
Total : 879,1 / 1350 = 65,12 %
PAIRE C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
1 NS 3S S-2 -100 33 66.00
2 NS 2P S+1 140 18 36.00
3 NS 3C W-1 100 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
4 NS 4C N+1 650 48 96.00
5 NS 3S S+2 660 48 96.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
7 NS 3C N-1 -100 45 90.00
8 NS 6C N = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 3S N+2 460 43.7 87.40 µ Tbl = 85,13 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
10 NS 2PcS = 670 50 100.00
11 NS 2K N+1 110 29 58.00
12 NS 3PcS-1 -200 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 59,33 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
13 NS 3S E-1 100 20 40.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 55,33 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 49 98.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
19 NS 4PcE-2 500 42 84.00
20 NS 4T W = -130 38 76.00
21 NS 2TcN-3 -800 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
22 NS 3C E-2 200 40 80.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 2S S = 120 27 54.00 µ Tbl = 62,67 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
25 NS 3S S+2 460 50 100.00
26 NS 3C N+1 170 26 52.00
27 NS 6K W = -920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,67 %
Total : 835,7 / 1350 = 61,90 %
PAIRE C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
1 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 34.00
2 EO 2P S+1 140 32 64.00
3 EO 3C W-1 100 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
4 EO 6CcN-1 -200 48 96.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 31 62.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
7 NS 2P W-1 100 48 96.00
8 NS 6C N = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 68,40 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
10 EO 2PcS-1 -200 47 94.00
11 EO 3KcS = 470 2 4.00
12 EO 1S N-2 -200 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 59,33 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
13 EO 3S W-1 100 30 60.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 44,67 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 46 92.00
18 EO 3C E-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
19 EO 5C N = 450 28 56.00
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 30 60.00
21 EO 3TcS-3 -800 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 68,67 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
22 NS 3C E-1 100 29 58.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 3CcW = -530 4 8.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
25 EO 3C N-1 -50 36 72.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 44 88.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 79,00 %
Total : 835,1 / 1350 = 61,86 %
PAIRE a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 41 82.00
2 EO 3CcW-3 500 0 0.00
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,67 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
4 EO 6CcS-1 -200 48 96.00
5 EO 3S S = 600 5 10.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
7 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 32.00
8 EO 7C N-1 -50 44 88.00
9 EO 6S N-3 -150 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
10 EO 2C W+1 -140 41 82.00
11 EO 3K S-1 -50 35 70.00
12 EO 3S S-4 -400 48 96.00 µ Tbl = 82,67 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
13 EO 3T W+1 -130 44 88.00
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 48 96.00
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 68,67 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
16 EO 3S S = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 36 72.00
18 EO 2S S+1 150 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 49,33 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
19 EO 4P E-1 100 43 86.00
20 EO 5K W = -600 20 40.00
21 EO 4C E = -420 28 56.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
22 EO 3C E-2 200 10 20.00
23 EO 2S E-1 100 7 14.00
24 EO 3C E = -140 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
25 EO 2P W-1 100 29 58.00
26 EO 3P E = -140 44 88.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 74,33 %
Total : 832,5 / 1350 = 61,67 %
PAIRE b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
1 EO 3P E = -140 27 54.00
2 EO 3C W-3 150 21 42.00
3 EO 2P N+1 140 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
4 EO 5C N-1 -100 38 76.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 31 62.00
6 EO 7S W-1 100 2 4.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 43 86.00
8 EO 5K S = 400 39 78.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 77,60 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
10 EO 4TcN-1 -200 47 94.00
11 EO 2S N = 120 13 26.00
12 EO 4PcS-3 -800 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 21 42.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 2PcS-6 -1700 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 46 92.00
18 EO 3C W-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
19 EO 5C N+1 480 18 36.00
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 43 86.00
21 EO 2KcN-3 -800 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 70,67 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
22 EO 3P S = 140 17 34.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
25 EO 3T N-1 -50 36 72.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 795,9 / 1350 = 58,96 %
PAIRE B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
1 NS 3ScW-4 800 50 100.00
2 NS 1S S+3 180 44 88.00
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 68,00 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 4TcN = 710 50 100.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 68,00 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 14.00
8 NS 6C N+1 1010 49 98.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 58,87 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 35 70.00
11 NS 4TcE-1 100 24 48.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 68,67 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
13 NS 4TcW-2 500 48 96.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 8.00
18 NS 3C W-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
19 NS 4PcE-1 200 14 28.00
20 NS 5T W+1 -620 20 40.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
22 NS 3PcS = 530 50 100.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 6.00
24 NS 4K N = 130 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 3P E-1 100 17 34.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 56,20 %
Total : 791,6 / 1350 = 58,64 %
PAIRE C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
1 EO 5KcE = -550 50 100.00
2 EO 2C E = -110 50 100.00
3 EO 3PcN-3 -500 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3P W = -140 19 38.00
6 NS 6P W = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
7 EO 3CcN-3 -800 50 100.00
8 EO 4C N+1 450 34 68.00
9 EO 3T N = 110 44.8 89.60 µ Tbl = 85,87 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
10 EO 2PcS = 670 0 0.00
11 EO 2K N+1 110 21 42.00
12 EO 3PcS-1 -200 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 40,67 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
13 EO 3S E-5 500 2 4.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 2CcN-3 -800 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 40,67 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
16 NS 3S S+1 430 38 76.00
17 NS 4C E = -420 36 72.00
18 NS 3C E-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
19 EO 6C N = 980 0 0.00
20 EO 6T E-1 100 7 14.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 22 44.00 µ Tbl = 19,33 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
22 EO 3C E = -140 43 86.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 38 76.00
24 EO 2P E-3 150 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
25 EO 3T N-2 -100 44 88.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 44 88.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 70,47 %
Total : 791,5 / 1350 = 58,63 %
PAIRE A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
1 NS 3K E+1 -130 28 56.00
2 NS 2C W-2 100 5 10.00
3 NS 3CcW-2 500 48 96.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
4 NS 4P S+1 650 48 96.00
5 NS 4T N = 130 42 84.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 72,67 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
7 NS 3C N-2 -200 29 58.00
8 NS 6K S+1 940 30 60.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 60,87 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 35 70.00
11 NS 1S S+1 120 37 74.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 77,33 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
13 NS 4C E-2 200 37 74.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S W+3 -490 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 8.00
18 NS 3K N = 110 37 74.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
19 NS 4P E-1 100 7 14.00
20 NS 5K W = -600 30 60.00
21 NS 4C E = -420 22 44.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
22 NS 4C E-3 300 46 92.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 2S S = 120 27 54.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 59,00 %
Total : 789,8 / 1350 = 58,50 %
PAIRE C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
1 EO 4TcN-3 -500 46 92.00
2 EO 1S S+3 180 6 12.00
3 EO 3C W-1 100 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 38 76.00
5 EO 3P W = -140 31 62.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
7 EO 3P E+2 -200 21 42.00
8 EO 4C S+3 510 22 44.00
9 EO 3T N = 110 44.8 89.60 µ Tbl = 58,53 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 33 66.00
11 EO 4KcS-1 -100 45 90.00
12 EO 2C S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,67 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
13 NS 3S W-5 500 48 96.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 2CcS-5 -1400 3 6.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 1 2.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 EO 4K N-1 -100 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
19 EO 4PcE-2 500 8 16.00
20 EO 4T W = -130 12 24.00
21 EO 2TcN-3 -800 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
22 EO 3C E = -140 43 86.00
23 EO 2K E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 2CcE+1 -570 49 98.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 59,00 %
Total : 780,3 / 1350 = 57,80 %
PAIRE A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
1 NS 2KcW+2 -380 12 24.00
2 NS 3T N+2 150 29 58.00
3 NS 2P N = 110 34 68.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
4 NS 5C N-1 -100 12 24.00
5 NS 3S S = 600 45 90.00
6 NS 6P W-1 100 48 96.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
7 NS 2P E+2 -170 34 68.00
8 NS 6C S = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 70,20 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 35 70.00
11 NS 3C N-2 -100 5 10.00
12 NS 2P N-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
13 NS 3P N = 140 29 58.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3K E+3 -170 46 92.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 NS 3C W-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 40,67 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
19 NS 5C N = 450 22 44.00
20 NS 5K W = -600 30 60.00
21 NS 3C E+1 -170 32 64.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
22 NS 3C E-2 200 40 80.00
23 NS 2S E-1 100 43 86.00
24 NS 3C E = -140 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
25 NS 3C N-1 -50 14 28.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 58,87 %
Total : 773,6 / 1350 = 57,30 %
PAIRE A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 38 76.00
2 NS 1S S+3 180 44 88.00
3 NS 3C W-1 100 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 70,67 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 5T N-1 -100 30 60.00
6 NS 6P E-1 100 48 96.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 14.00
8 NS 3S S+3 490 24 48.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 42,20 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
10 NS 3C E-1 100 26 52.00
11 NS 3P E-1 50 22 44.00
12 NS 1S N-2 -200 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
13 NS 3C E-2 200 37 74.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 47 94.00
15 NS 6K E = -920 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
16 NS 3S S = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 28.00
18 NS 2S S+1 150 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 50,67 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
19 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00
20 NS 5K E-1 100 43 86.00
21 NS 4C E-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
22 NS 3C E-1 100 29 58.00
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 14.00
24 NS 2S S+1 150 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 3C S = 140 21 42.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 58,87 %
Total : 756,6 / 1350 = 56,04 %
PAIRE C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
1 EO 4P W-1 50 12 24.00
2 EO 1S S+1 120 39 78.00
3 EO 2PcN+1 570 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3P W = -140 31 62.00
6 EO 6P W = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 35 70.00
8 EO 6C N = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 53,60 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
10 NS 3C W-1 100 26 52.00
11 NS 3C N-2 -100 5 10.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
13 EO 3S W-5 500 2 4.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 2CcS-5 -1400 47 94.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 EO 2C W = -110 46 92.00 µ Tbl = 69,33 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
19 EO 5C N = 450 28 56.00
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 30 60.00
21 EO 2KcN-3 -800 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 68,67 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
22 EO 3C E-1 100 21 42.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 3CcW = -530 46 92.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
25 EO 2P W-1 100 29 58.00
26 EO 4PcE-1 200 19 38.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 57,67 %
Total : 743,9 / 1350 = 55,10 %
PAIRE B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
1 NS 4K E = -130 28 56.00
2 NS 4T N+1 150 29 58.00
3 NS 2P N = 110 34 68.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3PcE = -530 4 8.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 37,33 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 14.00
8 NS 6C N+1 1010 49 98.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 35 70.00
11 NS 1S N+2 150 43 86.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 81,33 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
13 NS 4T W-1 100 20 40.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3CcS-4 -1100 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C W = -420 36 72.00
18 NS 3C W-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
19 NS 5C N+2 510 48 96.00
20 NS 3S E = -600 30 60.00
21 NS 4C E = -420 22 44.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
22 NS 3P S = 140 33 66.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
25 NS 3C N-2 -100 6 12.00
26 NS 4PcE-1 200 31 62.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 46,20 %
Total : 736,9 / 1350 = 54,59 %
PAIRE a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
1 EO 2KcW+2 -380 38 76.00
2 EO 3T N+2 150 21 42.00
3 EO 2P N = 110 16 32.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
4 EO 6T E-3 300 30 60.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 31 62.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
7 EO 3CcN-2 -500 27 54.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 32 64.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 33 66.00
11 EO 2S N = 120 13 26.00
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
13 EO 3P N-1 -100 39 78.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 50,67 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 46 92.00
18 EO 3K N = 110 13 26.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
19 EO 5C N-1 -50 48 96.00
20 EO 3S E-2 200 1 2.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 34 68.00 µ Tbl = 55,33 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
22 EO 3C E-1 100 21 42.00
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 43 86.00
24 EO 2S S+1 150 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 41,00 %
Total : 733,9 / 1350 = 54,36 %
PAIRE a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 41 82.00
2 EO 3C E-3 150 21 42.00
3 EO 3K E-2 200 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 4P E-1 50 15 30.00
6 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 43 86.00
8 EO 7S S-3 -150 50 100.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 84,93 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
10 EO 3C E-1 100 24 48.00
11 EO 3P E-1 50 28 56.00
12 EO 1S N-2 -200 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
13 EO 4C E-2 200 13 26.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S W+3 -490 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 EO 3C W-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 59,33 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
19 EO 4P W-1 100 43 86.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 20 40.00
21 EO 4C E-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 33 66.00
23 EO 3T W-2 200 1 2.00
24 EO 3C W-1 50 29 58.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
25 EO 2C N-2 -100 44 88.00
26 EO 4P W-1 100 33 66.00
27 EO 3S W+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 77,00 %
Total : 729,9 / 1350 = 54,07 %
PAIRE b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
1 EO 5K E-2 100 5 10.00
2 EO 1S S+1 120 39 78.00
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3PcE = -530 46 92.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 62,67 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
7 EO 3S E = -600 31 62.00
8 EO 6C N = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 6S N-1 -50 47.9 95.80 µ Tbl = 59,93 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 8 16.00
11 EO 4K S-1 -50 35 70.00
12 EO 2P S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
13 EO 4TcW = -710 50 100.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3K E+2 -150 2 4.00 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 EO 3C W-2 100 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 51,33 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
19 EO 5C N+1 480 18 36.00
20 EO 6S E = -1440 50 100.00
21 EO 4C E-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 51,33 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 25 50.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 2CcW+1 -570 49 98.00 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 3P E-1 100 33 66.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 43,80 %
Total : 725,6 / 1350 = 53,75 %
PAIRE B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
1 NS 4P E-2 100 45 90.00
2 NS 1S S+3 180 44 88.00
3 NS 3C W = -140 4 8.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 19 38.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 14.00
8 NS 5K S = 400 11 22.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 22,40 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
10 NS 2S N-1 -100 17 34.00
11 NS 4KcN = 510 50 100.00
12 NS 3K E-1 50 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
13 NS 3P N-1 -100 11 22.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 47 94.00
15 NS 3S W+3 -490 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 NS 3C W-2 100 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 48,67 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
19 NS 4C N+2 480 32 64.00
20 NS 5K W = -600 30 60.00
21 NS 4C W = -420 22 44.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
22 NS 2C E = -110 10 20.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 6.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
25 NS 3C N = 140 35 70.00
26 NS 4C N = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 6S E-1 50 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,67 %
Total : 723,6 / 1350 = 53,60 %
PAIRE a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 12 24.00
2 EO 1S S+3 180 6 12.00
3 EO 3C W-1 100 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 29,33 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
4 EO 4P S+1 650 2 4.00
5 EO 4T N = 130 8 16.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 27,33 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
7 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 32.00
8 EO 6C S = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 29,80 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
10 EO 2C W+1 -140 41 82.00
11 EO 4CcN-2 -300 50 100.00
12 EO 1S N-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,33 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 46 92.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 6K E = -920 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 12 24.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 1 2.00 µ Tbl = 25,33 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
19 EO 4P E-1 100 43 86.00
20 EO 6T E-1 100 7 14.00
21 EO 1SxN-3 -1600 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
22 EO 4C E-2 200 10 20.00
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 50 100.00
24 EO 4K N-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
25 EO 3C N-4 -200 50 100.00
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 36 72.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 83,00 %
Total : 714,2 / 1350 = 52,90 %
PAIRE C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
1 NS 4KcE = -510 2 4.00
2 NS 3T N+2 150 29 58.00
3 NS 3C E-2 200 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
4 NS 6CcN-1 -200 2 4.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 19 38.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
7 NS 3C N-1 -100 45 90.00
8 NS 7S N-2 -100 3 6.00
9 NS 3S N+3 490 48.9 97.80 µ Tbl = 64,60 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
10 NS 3C E-4 400 48 96.00
11 NS 3K N = 110 29 58.00
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
13 NS 3S E-5 500 48 96.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 2CcN-3 -800 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 59,33 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C E-1 50 47 94.00
18 NS 2S N+1 150 45 90.00 µ Tbl = 72,67 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
19 NS 5C N+1 480 32 64.00
20 NS 6K E-1 100 43 86.00
21 NS 4C E = -420 22 44.00 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
22 NS 3C E = -140 7 14.00
23 NS 2K E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 2CcE+1 -570 1 2.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
25 NS 2C N+2 170 47 94.00
26 NS 3C N+1 170 26 52.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 56,33 %
Total : 713,4 / 1350 = 52,84 %
PAIRE C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
1 EO 2P W+2 -170 33 66.00
2 EO 1S S+2 150 21 42.00
3 EO 3P N-3 -150 48 96.00 µ Tbl = 68,00 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
4 EO 5C N-1 -100 38 76.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 31 62.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 30.00
8 NS 6C N = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 46,40 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 33 66.00
11 EO 3K S = 110 21 42.00
12 EO 3K E-1 50 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
13 EO 3S E-1 100 30 60.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 44,67 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C E-1 50 3 6.00
18 EO 2S N+1 150 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 27,33 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
19 NS 6C N = 980 50 100.00
20 NS 6T E-1 100 43 86.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 28 56.00 µ Tbl = 80,67 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 33 66.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 4K S = 130 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 48,67 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
25 EO 3C N+1 170 3 6.00
26 EO 3P E = -140 44 88.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 43,13 %
Total : 709,3 / 1350 = 52,54 %
PAIRE B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
1 NS 5P E-2 100 45 90.00
2 NS 3T N+2 150 29 58.00
3 NS 2P N = 110 34 68.00 µ Tbl = 72,00 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
4 NS 5C N-1 -100 12 24.00
5 NS 3PcE = -530 4 8.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
7 NS 3S E = -600 19 38.00
8 NS 6C N = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 6S N-1 -50 2.1 4.20 µ Tbl = 40,07 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 35 70.00
11 NS 4K S-2 -100 5 10.00
12 NS 3T N-2 -200 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
13 NS 5T E-1 100 20 40.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,67 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 14 28.00
18 NS 3K N = 110 37 74.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
19 NS 5C N = 450 22 44.00
20 NS 6K W-2 200 49 98.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 74,67 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
22 NS 4CcE-2 500 48 96.00
23 NS 3C E-2 200 49 98.00
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 74,67 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
25 NS 3T N-1 -50 14 28.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 706,6 / 1350 = 52,34 %
PAIRE A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 18.00
2 NS 3CcW-3 500 50 100.00
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 49,33 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
4 NS 4C N-1 -100 12 24.00
5 NS 3C W-1 50 35 70.00
6 NS 5P E+1 -680 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 59,33 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
7 NS 3CcN-2 -500 23 46.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 18 36.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
10 NS 2P S-2 -200 3 6.00
11 NS 2KcS+2 380 46 92.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 4 8.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 6K E = -920 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 44 88.00
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 28.00
18 NS 2C W = -110 4 8.00 µ Tbl = 41,33 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
19 NS 5PcW-2 500 42 84.00
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 13 26.00
21 NS 4C E-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 64,00 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 17 34.00
23 NS 3T W-2 200 49 98.00
24 NS 3C W-1 50 21 42.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 72,87 %
Total : 705,9 / 1350 = 52,29 %
PAIRE A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
1 NS 4P E-2 100 45 90.00
2 NS 3T N+1 130 15 30.00
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
4 NS 6CcS-1 -200 2 4.00
5 NS 3S S = 600 45 90.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
7 NS 2P W+1 -140 39 78.00
8 NS 6C N = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 40%40% Ajust 20 40.00 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 17 34.00
11 NS 2S N = 120 37 74.00
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
13 NS 3P S = 140 29 58.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 38 76.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 49 98.00 µ Tbl = 74,67 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
19 NS 4PcE-2 500 42 84.00
20 NS 3S E = -600 30 60.00
21 NS 2PcS-2 -500 12 24.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
22 NS 4PcS-1 -100 17 34.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 49 98.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
25 NS 2C N-2 -100 6 12.00
26 NS 4P W-1 100 17 34.00
27 NS 3S W+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 23,00 %
Total : 705,5 / 1350 = 52,26 %
PAIRE b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
1 EO 3ScW-4 800 0 0.00
2 EO 1S S+3 180 6 12.00
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 32,00 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
4 EO 6CcN-1 -200 48 96.00
5 EO 4TcN-1 -200 40 80.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 79,33 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 43 86.00
8 EO 6C N+1 1010 1 2.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 15 30.00
11 EO 4K S-2 -100 45 90.00
12 EO 3T N-2 -200 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
13 EO 3P N = 140 21 42.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 3 6.00
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 6 12.00
17 EO 4C W = -420 14 28.00
18 EO 2C W = -110 46 92.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
19 EO 4C N+2 480 18 36.00
20 EO 5K W = -600 20 40.00
21 EO 4C W = -420 28 56.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
22 EO 3C E-2 200 10 20.00
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 43 86.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,67 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
25 EO 3C N-1 -50 36 72.00
26 EO 3P E = -140 44 88.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 65,13 %
Total : 698,1 / 1350 = 51,71 %
PAIRE C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
1 EO 3P E = -140 27 54.00
2 EO 2C E-2 100 45 90.00
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 76,00 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 40.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
7 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 32.00
8 EO 3S S+3 490 26 52.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 50,93 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
10 EO 3C W-1 100 24 48.00
11 EO 3C N-2 -100 45 90.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
13 EO 4T W-1 100 30 60.00
14 EO 5C S-1 -50 48 96.00
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 68,00 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 1 2.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
19 EO 5C N+1 480 18 36.00
20 EO 6K E-1 100 7 14.00
21 EO 4C E = -420 28 56.00 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 17 34.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 4K S = 130 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 51,33 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 41,00 %
Total : 685,9 / 1350 = 50,81 %
PAIRE B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
1 NS 4K E+1 -150 20 40.00
2 NS 3T N+2 150 29 58.00
3 NS 2P N = 110 34 68.00 µ Tbl = 55,33 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3T N = 110 40 80.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
7 NS 3S E = -600 19 38.00
8 NS 7C S-2 -100 3 6.00
9 NS 3S N+2 460 43.7 87.40 µ Tbl = 43,80 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
10 NS 4TcN-1 -200 3 6.00
11 NS 2S N = 120 37 74.00
12 NS 4PcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
13 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 4.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 6K E = -920 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 24,67 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 44 88.00
17 NS 4C W-1 50 47 94.00
18 NS 3C W-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
19 NS 5C N+1 480 32 64.00
20 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
21 NS 4C E-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 48,67 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
22 NS 3C E-2 200 40 80.00
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 14.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,33 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 4C N = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 44.8 89.60 µ Tbl = 81,20 %
Total : 684,5 / 1350 = 50,70 %
PAIRE C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
1 NS 3P E = -140 23 46.00
2 NS 2C E-2 100 5 10.00
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 24,00 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 12 24.00
5 NS 3P W = -140 19 38.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 30.00
8 NS 4C S+2 480 20 40.00
9 NS 3S S+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 17 34.00
11 NS 2S S = 120 37 74.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
13 NS 3S W-1 100 20 40.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 55,33 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C W-1 50 47 94.00
18 NS 2S S = 120 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 70,67 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
19 NS 4PcE-2 500 42 84.00
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 7 14.00
21 NS 2T W-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
22 NS 3C E = -140 7 14.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 12 24.00
24 NS 2P E-3 150 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
25 NS 3C N+1 170 47 94.00
26 NS 3P E = -140 6 12.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 56,87 %
Total : 673,6 / 1350 = 49,90 %
PAIRE b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
1 EO 5P E-2 100 5 10.00
2 EO 3T N+2 150 21 42.00
3 EO 2P N = 110 16 32.00 µ Tbl = 28,00 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3PcE = -530 46 92.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 62,67 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 43 86.00
8 EO 3C N+4 260 42 84.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 68,47 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
10 EO 2S N-1 -100 33 66.00
11 EO 4KcN = 510 0 0.00
12 EO 3K E-1 50 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
13 EO 3S W+1 -630 48 96.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 6K E = -920 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 75,33 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 12 24.00
17 EO 3S E = -400 8 16.00
18 EO 3K N = 110 13 26.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
19 EO 4PcE-1 200 36 72.00
20 EO 5T W+1 -620 30 60.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
22 EO 3PcS-3 -500 50 100.00
23 EO 2C W-1 100 7 14.00
24 EO 3K N = 110 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 55,33 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
25 EO 3C N-2 -100 44 88.00
26 EO 4PcE-1 200 19 38.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 53,80 %
Total : 673,4 / 1350 = 49,88 %
PAIRE b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
1 EO 4K E+1 -150 30 60.00
2 EO 3T N+2 150 21 42.00
3 EO 2P N = 110 16 32.00 µ Tbl = 44,67 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 31 62.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 43 86.00
8 EO 6C N+1 1010 1 2.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 41,13 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
10 EO 3T S-1 -100 33 66.00
11 EO 3K S-1 -50 35 70.00
12 EO 3P S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
13 EO 4T W-1 100 30 60.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3CcS-4 -1100 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 36 72.00
18 EO 3K N = 110 13 26.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
19 EO 5C N+1 480 18 36.00
20 EO 5K W = -600 20 40.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 31,33 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
22 EO 3P S-3 -150 47 94.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 2S S-3 -150 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 76,00 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
25 EO 3C N = 140 15 30.00
26 EO 4C N = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 6S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,33 %
Total : 666,7 / 1350 = 49,39 %
PAIRE A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 18.00
2 NS 3C E-3 150 29 58.00
3 NS 3K E-2 200 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3PcE = -530 4 8.00
6 NS 4P E+2 -680 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
7 NS 2P E+2 -170 34 68.00
8 NS 7C N-1 -50 6 12.00
9 NS 6S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
10 NS 3C E-1 100 26 52.00
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 15 30.00
12 NS 2T N = 90 36 72.00 µ Tbl = 51,33 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
13 NS 3P N-1 -100 11 22.00
14 NS 4C N = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 49,33 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C E = -420 36 72.00
18 NS 3C E-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
19 NS 4P E-1 100 7 14.00
20 NS 6T E-1 100 43 86.00
21 NS 1SxN-3 -1600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
22 NS 3P N = 140 33 66.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 4K N = 130 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
25 NS 2C N = 110 24 48.00
26 NS 4C N = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 60%40% Ajust 30 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,00 %
Total : 663,0 / 1350 = 49,11 %
PAIRE a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
1 EO 4T N-2 -100 17 34.00
2 EO 3C W-3 150 21 42.00
3 EO 3C W-1 100 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 5T N-1 -100 20 40.00
6 EO 6P E-1 100 2 4.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
7 EO 3C N-2 -200 21 42.00
8 EO 6K S+1 940 20 40.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 39,13 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 15 30.00
11 EO 3C N-2 -100 45 90.00
12 EO 2P N-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
13 EO 4P N-1 -100 39 78.00
14 EO 5C S-1 -50 48 96.00
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 6 12.00
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 36 72.00
18 EO 2C W = -110 46 92.00 µ Tbl = 58,67 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
19 EO 4PcE-2 500 8 16.00
20 EO 3S E = -600 20 40.00
21 EO 2PcS-2 -500 38 76.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
22 EO 3P N = 140 17 34.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 4K N = 130 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
25 EO 3C N-3 -150 48 96.00
26 EO 2C N+2 170 24 48.00
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
Total : 658,4 / 1350 = 48,77 %
PAIRE C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
1 NS 4P W-1 50 38 76.00
2 NS 1S S+1 120 11 22.00
3 NS 2PcN+1 570 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
4 EO 4C N-1 -100 38 76.00
5 EO 4PcE-1 100 12 24.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
7 EO 3C N-1 -100 5 10.00
8 EO 6C N = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 3S N+2 460 6.3 12.60 µ Tbl = 14,87 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
10 EO 3C E-4 400 2 4.00
11 EO 3K N = 110 21 42.00
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
13 NS 3S W-3 300 42 84.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 1PcS-5 -1400 3 6.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
16 EO 3S S+1 430 12 24.00
17 EO 4C E = -420 14 28.00
18 EO 3C E-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
19 EO 4PcE-2 500 8 16.00
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 43 86.00
21 EO 2T W-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 25 50.00
23 EO 2T W = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 3C W-1 50 29 58.00 µ Tbl = 51,33 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
25 EO 3C N-1 -50 36 72.00
26 EO 3P E = -140 44 88.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 79,00 %
Total : 646,8 / 1350 = 47,91 %
PAIRE a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
1 EO 4P E+2 -480 44 88.00
2 EO 3C W-2 100 45 90.00
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,67 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 4K S-1 -100 20 40.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 43 86.00
8 EO 3S S+3 490 26 52.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 57,80 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 15 30.00
11 EO 1S S+1 120 13 26.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 22,67 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
13 EO 3P N = 140 21 42.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3K E+3 -170 4 8.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 36 72.00
18 EO 3C W-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
19 EO 5PcW-2 500 8 16.00
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 37 74.00
21 EO 4C E-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 36,00 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
22 EO 4PcS-1 -100 33 66.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 1 2.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
25 EO 2C N = 110 26 52.00
26 EO 4C N = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 60%40% Ajust 20 40.00 µ Tbl = 36,00 %
Total : 628,7 / 1350 = 46,57 %
PAIRE b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
1 EO 4K E = -130 22 44.00
2 EO 4T N+1 150 21 42.00
3 EO 2P N = 110 16 32.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
4 EO 5C N-1 -100 38 76.00
5 EO 3PcE = -530 46 92.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 6C N = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 19,13 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
10 EO 3C E-2 200 5 10.00
11 EO 4K S-1 -50 35 70.00
12 EO 2S E = -120 32 64.00 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
13 EO 3P N-1 -100 39 78.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 3 6.00
15 EO 3S W+3 -490 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 6 12.00
17 EO 4C W-1 50 3 6.00
18 EO 3C W-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
19 EO 4P E-2 200 36 72.00
20 EO 6K W = -1370 48 96.00
21 EO 2PcS-2 -500 38 76.00 µ Tbl = 81,33 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
22 EO 3PcS = 530 0 0.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 47 94.00
24 EO 4K N = 130 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 44 88.00
27 EO 3S E = -400 2.1 4.20 µ Tbl = 40,73 %
Total : 627,8 / 1350 = 46,50 %
PAIRE C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
1 NS 4TcN-3 -500 4 8.00
2 NS 1S S+3 180 44 88.00
3 NS 3C W-1 100 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
4 EO 4C N+1 650 2 4.00
5 EO 3PcW = -530 46 92.00
6 EO 6P W = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 35 70.00
8 EO 4C S+2 480 30 60.00
9 EO 3S S+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 15 30.00
11 EO 2K S+1 110 21 42.00
12 EO 2K N-2 -200 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 50,67 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
13 EO 3C E-2 200 13 26.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 NS 2C W = -110 4 8.00 µ Tbl = 30,67 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
19 EO 5P E-1 100 43 86.00
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 43 86.00
21 EO 3C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
22 EO 3C E-2 200 10 20.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 2S S = 120 23 46.00 µ Tbl = 37,33 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
25 EO 2C N+2 170 3 6.00
26 EO 3C N+1 170 24 48.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 38.5 77.00 µ Tbl = 43,67 %
Total : 626,2 / 1350 = 46,39 %
PAIRE B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
1 NS 3P E+1 -170 17 34.00
2 NS 3C W-3 150 29 58.00
3 NS 3C E-1 100 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 19 38.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
7 NS 2P W = -110 42 84.00
8 NS 6C N = 980 39 78.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 64,40 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
10 NS 3C W-2 200 45 90.00
11 NS 3K S-1 -50 15 30.00
12 NS 3P S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 29 58.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 2PcS-6 -1700 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 38 76.00
17 NS 3S E = -400 42 84.00
18 NS 3K N = 110 37 74.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
19 NS 4P E-2 200 14 28.00
20 NS 6K W = -1370 2 4.00
21 NS 2PcS-2 -500 12 24.00 µ Tbl = 18,67 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 25 50.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 2CcW+1 -570 1 2.00 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
25 NS 3C N-1 -50 14 28.00
26 NS 3P E = -140 6 12.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 34,87 %
Total : 625,9 / 1350 = 46,36 %
PAIRE C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
1 EO 4KcE = -510 48 96.00
2 EO 3T N+2 150 21 42.00
3 EO 3C E-2 200 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
4 NS 4C N+1 650 48 96.00
5 NS 3PcW = -530 4 8.00
6 NS 6P W = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
7 EO 2P W-1 100 2 4.00
8 EO 6C N = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 31,60 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 33 66.00
11 EO 2S S = 120 13 26.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
13 EO 4C E-2 200 13 26.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 6K E = -920 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 36 72.00
18 EO 3C W = -140 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,33 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
19 NS 5C N = 450 22 44.00
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 20 40.00
21 NS 2KcN-3 -800 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 31,33 %
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 33 66.00
23 EO 3S E-1 100 7 14.00
24 EO 3K N+1 130 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
25 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
26 EO 3C N+1 170 24 48.00
27 EO 6K W = -920 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 49,33 %
Total : 620,4 / 1350 = 45,96 %
PAIRE B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
1 NS 3K E+1 -130 28 56.00
2 NS 4T N = 130 15 30.00
3 NS 2P N = 110 34 68.00 µ Tbl = 51,33 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
4 NS 5C N-1 -100 12 24.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 19 38.00
6 NS 7S W-1 100 48 96.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 14.00
8 NS 3C N+4 260 8 16.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 31,53 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
10 NS 3C E-2 200 45 90.00
11 NS 4K S-1 -50 15 30.00
12 NS 2S E = -120 18 36.00 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
13 NS 4TcW = -710 0 0.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3K E+2 -150 48 96.00 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 44 88.00
17 NS 4C W = -420 36 72.00
18 NS 2C W = -110 4 8.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
19 NS 4PcW-1 200 14 28.00
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 7 14.00
21 NS 2KcN-2 -500 12 24.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
22 NS 3P S-3 -150 3 6.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 2S S-3 -150 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 24,00 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 42 84.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 72,87 %
Total : 615,6 / 1350 = 45,60 %
PAIRE C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 38 76.00
2 NS 1S S+3 180 44 88.00
3 NS 3K E-2 200 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 84,00 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
4 NS 4C N-1 -100 12 24.00
5 NS 4PcE-1 100 38 76.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
7 NS 3CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 4C N+1 450 16 32.00
9 NS 3T N = 110 5.2 10.40 µ Tbl = 14,13 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 17 34.00
11 NS 3K S = 110 29 58.00
12 NS 3K E-1 50 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
13 NS 4T W-1 100 20 40.00
14 NS 5C S-1 -50 2 4.00
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 32,00 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 49 98.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 25 50.00
18 NS 4K N-1 -100 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
19 NS 5P E-1 100 7 14.00
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 7 14.00
21 NS 3C W-2 100 50 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 17 34.00
23 NS 3S E-1 100 43 86.00
24 NS 3K N+1 130 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
25 NS 3C N-1 -50 14 28.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 12.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 21,00 %
Total : 613,7 / 1350 = 45,46 %
PAIRE a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
1 EO 2P E+4 -230 36 72.00
2 EO 2C W-2 100 45 90.00
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
4 EO 4C N-1 -100 38 76.00
5 EO 3C W-1 50 15 30.00
6 EO 5P E+1 -680 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 40,67 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
7 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 22.00
8 EO 6C N = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 40%40% Ajust 20 40.00 µ Tbl = 28,00 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
10 EO 3C E-1 100 24 48.00
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 35 70.00
12 EO 2T N = 90 14 28.00 µ Tbl = 48,67 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
13 EO 4P N-1 -100 39 78.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 3 6.00
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C E = -420 14 28.00
18 EO 3C W-2 100 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
19 EO 3P E = -140 50 100.00
20 EO 5K E-1 100 7 14.00
21 EO 4C E-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
22 EO 4C E-3 300 4 8.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 2S S = 120 23 46.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
25 EO 3C N-1 -50 36 72.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 41,13 %
Total : 608,7 / 1350 = 45,09 %
PAIRE a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
1 EO 4P E-2 100 5 10.00
2 EO 3T N+1 130 35 70.00
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3PcE = -530 46 92.00
6 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
7 EO 3C N-3 -300 24 48.00
8 EO 4S N = 430 36 72.00
9 EO 3S N+2 460 6.3 12.60 µ Tbl = 44,20 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
10 EO 1ScN-1 -200 47 94.00
11 EO 3P E-3 150 7 14.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
13 EO 3C E-2 200 13 26.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 3 6.00
15 EO 6K E = -920 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 46 92.00
18 EO 3K N = 110 13 26.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
19 EO 5C N = 450 28 56.00
20 EO 5K W = -600 20 40.00
21 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 36.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 33 66.00
23 EO 2K E-1 100 7 14.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 27,13 %
Total : 601,0 / 1350 = 44,52 %
PAIRE a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole
A.5 RENARD Claude -BOLLE Michel 58,50 %
1 EO 3K E+1 -130 22 44.00
2 EO 2C W-2 100 45 90.00
3 EO 3CcW-2 500 2 4.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
A.1 KAPLAN Alain -POLET Guy 57,30 %
4 EO 5C N-1 -100 38 76.00
5 EO 3S S = 600 5 10.00
6 EO 6P W-1 100 2 4.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter 35,69 %
7 EO 3P W = -140 11 22.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 39 78.00
9 EO 3S N+1 430 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 45,13 %
A.2 ZENS Martine -NAPOLI Daniela 52,29 %
10 EO 2P S-2 -200 47 94.00
11 EO 2KcS+2 380 4 8.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
A.7 SEMAL Pierre -BERRO Ammar 52,26 %
13 EO 3P S = 140 21 42.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
A.3 MASSANGE Regis -WYNEN Christian 49,11 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C E = -420 14 28.00
18 EO 3C E-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela 41,48 %
19 EO 5C N = 450 28 56.00
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 37 74.00
21 EO 4C E = -420 28 56.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine 44,23 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 33 66.00
23 EO 2K E = -90 23 46.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 1 2.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
A.9 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre 56,04 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 3C S = 140 29 58.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 41,13 %
Total : 599,4 / 1350 = 44,40 %
PAIRE A.4 ARIDIJS Laura -ABIDIAN Madeleine
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
1 NS 4T N-2 -100 33 66.00
2 NS 3C W-3 150 29 58.00
3 NS 3C W-1 100 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 4K S-1 -100 30 60.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 14.00
8 NS 7S S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 15,07 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
10 NS 1ScN-1 -200 3 6.00
11 NS 3P E-3 150 43 86.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 44 88.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
13 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 12.00
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 4.00
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 39 78.00 µ Tbl = 31,33 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C E = -420 36 72.00
18 NS 3C W-2 100 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
19 NS 5C N-1 -50 2 4.00
20 NS 3S E-2 200 49 98.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 16 32.00 µ Tbl = 44,67 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 17 34.00
23 NS 2K E = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 49 98.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
25 NS 3C N-4 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 14 28.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 17,00 %
Total : 597,1 / 1350 = 44,23 %
PAIRE b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
1 EO 3K E+1 -130 22 44.00
2 EO 4T N = 130 35 70.00
3 EO 2P N = 110 16 32.00 µ Tbl = 48,67 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 31 62.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 52,67 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
7 EO 3S E = -600 31 62.00
8 EO 7C S-2 -100 47 94.00
9 EO 3S N+2 460 6.3 12.60 µ Tbl = 56,20 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
10 EO 3C W-2 200 5 10.00
11 EO 3K S-1 -50 35 70.00
12 EO 3P S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
13 EO 4TcW-2 500 2 4.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 46 92.00
18 EO 3C W-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
19 EO 5C N+2 510 2 4.00
20 EO 3S E = -600 20 40.00
21 EO 4C E = -420 28 56.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
22 EO 4CcE-2 500 2 4.00
23 EO 3C E-2 200 1 2.00
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 35 70.00 µ Tbl = 25,33 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 3C N = 140 29 58.00
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 5.2 10.40 µ Tbl = 32,80 %
Total : 587,5 / 1350 = 43,52 %
PAIRE C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
1 NS 2P W+2 -170 17 34.00
2 NS 1S S+2 150 29 58.00
3 NS 3P N-3 -150 2 4.00 µ Tbl = 32,00 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 30 60.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
7 NS 3P E+2 -200 29 58.00
8 NS 4C S+3 510 28 56.00
9 NS 3T N = 110 5.2 10.40 µ Tbl = 41,47 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 35 70.00
11 NS 2K S+1 110 29 58.00
12 NS 2K N-2 -200 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 49,33 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
13 NS 4C E-2 200 37 74.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 6K E = -920 11 22.00 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 8.00
18 NS 3C E-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
19 NS 5PcW-2 500 42 84.00
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 32.00
21 NS 1ScS-1 -200 30 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,67 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 25 50.00
23 NS 2T W = -90 27 54.00
24 NS 3C W-1 50 21 42.00 µ Tbl = 48,67 %
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
25 NS 3T N-2 -100 6 12.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 12.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 29,53 %
Total : 583,5 / 1350 = 43,22 %
PAIRE B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean
b.7 COOREMAN Thierry -DEBAEKE Pierre 53,75 %
1 NS 5K E-2 100 45 90.00
2 NS 1S S+1 120 11 22.00
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,33 %
b.6 REGIMONT Xavier -BERNARD Romain 51,71 %
4 NS 6CcN-1 -200 2 4.00
5 NS 4TcN-1 -200 10 20.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 20,67 %
b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan 39,87 %
7 NS 3CcN-2 -500 23 46.00
8 NS 3S S+3 490 24 48.00
9 NS 3S N+3 490 48.9 97.80 µ Tbl = 63,93 %
b.4 CHEVALIER Bruno -DUBOIS Claire 49,39 %
10 NS 3T S-1 -100 17 34.00
11 NS 3K S-1 -50 15 30.00
12 NS 3P S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric 36,53 %
13 NS 3S W-4 400 44 88.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 1PcS-3 -800 17 34.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.2 NOACH Sophie -SHAOUDI Ferry 43,52 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 8.00
18 NS 3C W-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
b.1 DEHAYE Bernard -DEWASME Isabelle 58,96 %
19 NS 5C N+1 480 32 64.00
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 7 14.00
21 NS 2KcN-3 -800 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 29,33 %
b.9 LEBOULENGE Patrick -DEVIGNE Alain 49,88 %
22 NS 3PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
23 NS 2C W-1 100 43 86.00
24 NS 3K N = 110 24 48.00 µ Tbl = 44,67 %
b.8 VIOT Alexandre -KEULLER Bruno 46,50 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 35 70.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 12.00
27 NS 3S E = -400 47.9 95.80 µ Tbl = 59,27 %
Total : 579,8 / 1350 = 42,95 %
PAIRE A.8 HUVE Claude -DUFFIN Pamela
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
1 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 12.00
2 NS 3C W-2 100 5 10.00
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,33 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
4 NS 4C N = 620 33 66.00
5 NS 4P E-1 50 35 70.00
6 NS 4P E+2 -680 42 84.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
7 NS 3C N-3 -300 26 52.00
8 NS 4S N = 430 14 28.00
9 NS 3S N+2 460 43.7 87.40 µ Tbl = 55,80 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
10 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 18.00
11 NS 3K S-1 -50 15 30.00
12 NS 3S S-4 -400 2 4.00 µ Tbl = 17,33 %
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
13 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 22.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 47 94.00
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 8.00
18 NS 3K N = 110 37 74.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
19 NS 5C N = 450 22 44.00
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 13 26.00
21 NS 4C E = -420 22 44.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
22 NS 4C E-2 200 40 80.00
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
24 NS 4K N-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
25 NS 3C N-3 -150 2 4.00
26 NS 2C N+2 170 26 52.00
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
Total : 560,0 / 1350 = 41,48 %
PAIRE C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit
C11 KUCZYNSKI Daniel -WORNET Caroline 45,46 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 12 24.00
2 EO 1S S+3 180 6 12.00
3 EO 3K E-2 200 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 16,00 %
C10 BOCKEN Patrick -BACKES Jean-Marie 61,90 %
4 EO 4C N+1 650 2 4.00
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2 4.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
C16 HAUSEUX Francois -PROUMEN Leon-Pierre 52,84 %
7 EO 3C N-1 -100 5 10.00
8 EO 7S N-2 -100 47 94.00
9 EO 3S N+3 490 1.1 2.20 µ Tbl = 35,40 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
10 NS 2PcS-1 -200 3 6.00
11 NS 3KcS = 470 48 96.00
12 NS 1S N-2 -200 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,67 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
13 EO 3S W-3 300 8 16.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 1PcS-5 -1400 47 94.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
C13 MOMMAERTS Laure -STUYCK Dominique 49,90 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C W-1 50 3 6.00
18 EO 2S S = 120 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 29,33 %
C12 ENGLUND Florence -HEERINCKX Colette 43,22 %
19 EO 5PcW-2 500 8 16.00
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 34 68.00
21 EO 1ScS-1 -200 20 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,33 %
C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan 29,04 %
22 EO 3P S-3 -150 47 94.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 38 76.00
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 40 80.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
C14 COENRAETS Philippe -ENGEL Zvi 55,10 %
25 NS 2P W-1 100 21 42.00
26 NS 4PcE-1 200 31 62.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 42,33 %
Total : 548,6 / 1350 = 40,64 %
PAIRE b.5 CARRETTE Patrick -DUVERGER Jan
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
1 EO 3P E+1 -170 33 66.00
2 EO 3C W-3 150 21 42.00
3 EO 3C E-1 100 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 4TcN = 710 0 0.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 32,00 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
7 EO 3CcN-2 -500 27 54.00
8 EO 3S S+3 490 26 52.00
9 EO 3S N+3 490 1.1 2.20 µ Tbl = 36,07 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 15 30.00
11 EO 1S N+2 150 7 14.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 18,67 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
13 EO 5T E-1 100 30 60.00
14 EO 4C N = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,33 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
16 EO 3S N+3 490 1 2.00
17 EO 4C W-1 50 3 6.00
18 EO 3C W-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
19 EO 4PcW-1 200 36 72.00
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 43 86.00
21 EO 2KcN-2 -500 38 76.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
22 EO 2C E = -110 40 80.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 47 94.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 4C N = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.2 10.40 µ Tbl = 18,80 %
Total : 538,3 / 1350 = 39,87 %
PAIRE b.3 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric
B.2 VAN DER KELEN Danielle -BOYART Martine 53,60 %
1 EO 4P E-2 100 5 10.00
2 EO 1S S+3 180 6 12.00
3 EO 3C W = -140 46 92.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
B.7 COUTEAUX Antonella -ANGELINI Letizia 50,70 %
4 EO 4C N = 620 17 34.00
5 EO 3T N = 110 10 20.00
6 EO 6P E = -1430 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
B.3 CHIF Alain -DUREN-ROSMAN Francoise 46,36 %
7 EO 2P W = -110 8 16.00
8 EO 6C N = 980 11 22.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 34.4 68.80 µ Tbl = 35,60 %
B.8 MONTICELLI Thomas -LESPAGNARD Tristan 58,64 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 15 30.00
11 EO 4TcE-1 100 26 52.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 6 12.00 µ Tbl = 31,33 %
B.4 ORTEGAT Pascale -de VILLENFAGNE Jean 42,95 %
13 EO 3S W-4 400 6 12.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 26 52.00
15 EO 1PcS-3 -800 33 66.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.9 CLAEYS Yves -SPINDEL Jean-Paul 54,59 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 33 66.00
17 EO 4C W = -420 14 28.00
18 EO 3C W-1 50 31 62.00 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
B.5 CARPENTIER Frederic -KURGAN Daniel 52,34 %
19 EO 5C N = 450 28 56.00
20 EO 6K W-2 200 1 2.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 9 18.00 µ Tbl = 25,33 %
B.1 LABAERE Alain -LABAERE Valerie 65,12 %
22 EO 3C E-2 200 10 20.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 38 76.00
24 EO 2S S+2 180 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 37,33 %
B.6 SENY Brigitte -MICHAUX Pascal 45,60 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 15 30.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 16.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.7 35.40 µ Tbl = 27,13 %
Total : 493,1 / 1350 = 36,53 %
PAIRE A.6 VERHULST-BARSAMIAN Mich. -MASTERSON Peter
a.2 MEERT Christian -LAHAUT Michel 45,09 %
1 NS 2P E+4 -230 14 28.00
2 NS 2C W-2 100 5 10.00
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 8 16.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
a.1 CALAS Damien -GELIBTER Daniel 54,36 %
4 NS 6T E-3 300 20 40.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 19 38.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
a.9 EFIRA Arthur -VERBRUGGEN Nicole 44,40 %
7 NS 3P W = -140 39 78.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 11 22.00
9 NS 3S N+1 430 32.3 64.60 µ Tbl = 54,87 %
a.8 BERBEN Martine -DUBOIS Daniel 52,90 %
10 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 18.00
11 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 1S N-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,67 %
a.7 COULIE Joelle -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline 48,77 %
13 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 22.00
14 NS 5C S-1 -50 2 4.00
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
a.6 LEBLU Pascaline -HUBLET Carlo 46,57 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 28.00
18 NS 3C W-1 50 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 BIGDELI Faramarz -BOLLACK Bogdan 54,07 %
19 NS 4P W-1 100 7 14.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 30 60.00
21 NS 4C E-1 50 41 82.00 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
a.4 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge 44,52 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 17 34.00
23 NS 2K E-1 100 43 86.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 15 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 VAN BRANDT Leopold -VAN BRANDT Carl-Louis 61,67 %
25 NS 2P W-1 100 21 42.00
26 NS 3P E = -140 6 12.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 25,67 %
Total : 481,8 / 1350 = 35,69 %
PAIRE C15 de WASSEIGE Ariane -COLLINET Gaetan
C.6 BLOCK Frank -MIRAVET Solange 58,63 %
1 NS 5KcE = -550 0 0.00
2 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
3 NS 3PcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
C.9 THYS Alexandre -GILBERT Eric 52,54 %
4 NS 5C N-1 -100 12 24.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 19 38.00
6 NS 6P E = -1430 19 38.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
C.5 STAS Jacques -JOHNSON David 50,81 %
7 NS 2P E+2 -170 34 68.00
8 NS 3S S+3 490 24 48.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 15.6 31.20 µ Tbl = 49,07 %
C.3 MAHY Alain -MATELART Marc 57,80 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 17 34.00
11 NS 4KcS-1 -100 5 10.00
12 NS 2C S-1 -100 25 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,33 %
C.8 HAYM Dilva -POLET Patrick 46,39 %
13 NS 3C E-2 200 37 74.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 24 48.00
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 26 52.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
C.4 LAFOURCADE Eloise -PLETSER Olga 45,96 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 17 34.00
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 28.00
18 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,67 %
C.1 JOURDAIN Jean Francois -CONTRERAS Alain 61,86 %
19 NS 5C N = 450 22 44.00
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 20 40.00
21 NS 3TcS-3 -800 5 10.00 µ Tbl = 31,33 %
C.7 MONTICELLI Romain -GUIOT Benoit 40,64 %
22 NS 3P S-3 -150 3 6.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 12 24.00
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 10 20.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
C.2 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -KATILA Tina 47,91 %
25 NS 3C N-1 -50 14 28.00
26 NS 3P E = -140 6 12.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 11.5 23.00 µ Tbl = 21,00 %
Total : 392,1 / 1350 = 29,04 %
|