|
Tournoi du 16-11-14
Kiwanis2014
1 68,29 A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri
2 62,76 b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
3 60,99 A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques
4 60,69 a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine
5 59,35 b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle
6 59,13 B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique
7 59,03 a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise
8 57,51 B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline
9 57,31 b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan
10 56,84 B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne
11 56,54 a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine
12 55,94 B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs
13 55,89 a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne
14 53,57 a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte
15 53,28 A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette
16 53,10 b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon
17 51,64 a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena
18 51,11 b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique
19 49,95 a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne
20 49,48 B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane
21 49,36 a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine
22 48,79 B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle
23 48,41 B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette
24 48,36 A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle
25 46,94 B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François
26 46,61 A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia
27 46,21 A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole
28 45,09 B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques
29 44,55 B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi
30 44,32 A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris
31 44,22 A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte
32 43,91 b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle
33 42,29 b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine
34 41,56 A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric
35 41,39 b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine
36 40,32 a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis
37 39,59 b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric
38 37,27 b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise
39 35,31 a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne
40 33,88 A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène
PAIRE Nr : A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 % 1 NS 4P N-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 4P S-3 -300 3 8.82
3 NS 5C E+1 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 13,73 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 % 4 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 35.29
5 NS 3P N = 140 22 64.71
6 NS 4S N+1 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 25 73.53
8 NS 3S N+2 460 34 100.00
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 %10 NS 2P W = -110 3 8.82
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 23.53
12 NS 3S S+1 630 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 19,61 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 %13 NS 4P E = -620 5 14.71
14 NS 2K E-3 150 2 5.88
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 12,75 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 %16 NS 3T S+1 130 0 0.00
17 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 5.88
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 8,82 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 2.94
20 NS 3S N = 600 31 91.18
21 NS 3P N-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 %22 NS 3K S-1 -50 21 61.76
23 NS 5K S-1 -100 8 23.53
24 NS 4C E = -420 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 %25 NS 3S E-2 200 34 100.00
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4PcE = -590 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
Total : 311,0 / 918 = 33,88 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 19 55.88
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 5.88
6 NS 3S N+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 1 2.94
8 NS 3S N = 400 27 79.41
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 %10 NS 2C E = -110 3 8.82
11 NS 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 28,43 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 %13 NS 2S W+1 -150 15 44.12
14 NS 3S N+2 460 33 97.06
15 NS 2S E+1 -150 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 78,43 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 %16 NS 2S S+1 150 2 5.88
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 20.59
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 %19 NS 2C W+2 -170 21 61.76
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 14.71
21 NS 4K E = -130 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 20.59
23 NS 6S S-4 -400 0 0.00
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 8,82 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 3S S+2 660 32 94.12
27 NS 4P W = -420 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 %28 NS 3S S = 600 26.5 77.94
29 NS 3S N+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 57,35 %
Total : 381,5 / 918 = 41,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 % 1 NS 2S S+1 150 28 82.35
2 NS 3P N-3 -300 3 8.82
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 32.35
8 NS 2S N-2 -100 7 20.59
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 %10 NS 3K S-1 -100 10 29.41
11 NS 3S W-1 50 31 91.18
12 NS 3S S+2 660 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 %13 NS 3P E+2 -200 8 23.53
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 44.12
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 28,43 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 33 97.06
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 38.24
18 NS 3C W-3 150 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 74,51 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 %19 NS 2C W+2 -170 21 61.76
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 14.71
21 NS 3P N-2 -200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 28,43 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 20.59
23 NS 4C S = 620 18 52.94
24 NS 4C E-1 50 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 %25 NS 3S E+4 -720 0 0.00
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4P E = -420 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 26,47 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 4C N+2 680 23 67.65
30 NS 4P W-1 50 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,49 %
Total : 427,9 / 918 = 46,61 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 14.71
2 NS 2P S-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 17.65
5 NS 2P S = 110 13 38.24
6 NS 6S S = 990 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 %10 NS 2T W = -90 17 50.00
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 8.82
12 NS 3S S+4 720 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 %13 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 2.94
14 NS 4C N+1 450 28 82.35
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 24 70.59
17 NS 2P W+2 -170 28 82.35
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 %19 NS 4C W-1 100 27 79.41
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 14.71
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 %22 NS 3P E = -140 7 20.59
23 NS 3S S+2 660 32 94.12
24 NS 3S E = -400 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 3S N+2 660 32 94.12
27 NS 4T W = -130 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 3S S+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 31,27 %
Total : 443,9 / 918 = 48,36 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 % 1 NS 3P N = 140 22 64.71
2 NS 2P S+1 140 34 100.00
3 NS 5K E+2 -640 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 19 55.88
5 NS 2P S+2 170 32 94.12
6 NS 3S N+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 25 73.53
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 12 35.29
9 NS 4C E = -620 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 28 82.35
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 44.12
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 %16 NS 3S S = 400 11 32.35
17 NS 3S W-2 100 32 94.12
18 NS 3KcS+1 870 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 %19 NS 4C W = -620 8 23.53
20 NS 4P N+2 680 34 100.00
21 NS 3K E = -110 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 %22 NS 3P E-2 200 34 100.00
23 NS 3S S+1 630 25 73.53
24 NS 3S E = -400 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 80,39 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 27 79.41
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 33.9 99.71
29 NS 4C N+2 680 23 67.65
30 NS 2P W = -110 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 84,22 %
Total : 626,9 / 918 = 68,29 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 % 1 NS 2P N = 110 15 44.12
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 6C W = -1430 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 26 76.47
5 NS 2P S+1 140 22 64.71
6 NS 3S S = 400 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 11 32.35
8 NS 3P W-3 150 19 55.88
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 %10 NS 3K S-1 -100 10 29.41
11 NS 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 NS 5K N = 600 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 28,43 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 24 70.59
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 38.24
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 %19 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 2.94
20 NS 2P S+2 170 23 67.65
21 NS 3K E = -110 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 %22 NS 2P E = -110 16 47.06
23 NS 3S N = 600 14 41.18
24 NS 3S E = -400 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 %25 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 8.82
26 NS 3S S+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4P E = -420 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 3S S+3 690 30 88.24
30 NS 2P W = -110 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 72,45 %
Total : 406,9 / 918 = 44,32 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 % 1 NS 3T E-3 150 28 82.35
2 NS 1P N = 80 26 76.47
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 % 4 NS 1P E+2 -140 6 17.65
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 14.71
6 NS 3S N+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 26,47 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 32.35
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 12 35.29
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 %10 NS 2S W-3 300 31 91.18
11 NS 3S W-1 50 31 91.18
12 NS 3K N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 %13 NS 1S W+2 -150 15 44.12
14 NS 2S S+3 210 6 17.65
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 26,47 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 %19 NS 3C W = -140 24 70.59
20 NS 3S S = 600 31 91.18
21 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 20.59
23 NS 3S S = 600 14 41.18
24 NS 4C E = -420 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 4T S-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 4CcS-1 -100 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 %28 NS 4C S-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 3S S+1 630 2 5.88
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 37,16 %
Total : 405,9 / 918 = 44,22 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 14.71
2 NS 3K E-2 100 28 82.35
3 NS 5C W+1 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 19 55.88
5 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 14.71
6 NS 3S N+3 490 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 % 7 NS 3P N+1 170 25 73.53
8 NS 2PcW-2 300 22 64.71
9 NS 4C E-2 200 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 78,43 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 %10 NS 2K S-1 -100 10 29.41
11 NS 3S W-1 50 31 91.18
12 NS 3S N+3 690 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 %13 NS 2S W = -120 21 61.76
14 NS 4C N+1 450 28 82.35
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 %16 NS 3S S = 400 11 32.35
17 NS 4P W = -420 18 52.94
18 NS 5P E-1 50 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 %22 NS 2P E = -110 16 47.06
23 NS 6K N-2 -200 3 8.82
24 NS 3S E = -400 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 %25 NS 3S W = -600 32 94.12
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4CcS-1 -100 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 74,51 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 %28 NS 3S S-3 -300 0.1 0.29
29 NS 3S S+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 16,76 %
Total : 489,1 / 918 = 53,28 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 34 100.00
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 3C E+3 -230 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 76,47 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 % 4 NS 1C E = -80 28 82.35
5 NS 2P N+1 140 22 64.71
6 NS 3S N+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine : 60,69 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 11 32.35
8 NS 2S N+1 150 19 55.88
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 %10 NS 3T E-4 400 34 100.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 17 50.00
12 NS 3S N+4 720 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 78,43 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 %13 NS 4C E-3 300 34 100.00
14 NS 4C N+1 450 28 82.35
15 NS 2S E+3 -210 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 90,20 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 24 70.59
17 NS 3S E = -400 22 64.71
18 NS 4K N = 130 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 %19 NS 5K E = -600 15 44.12
20 NS 2P N+2 170 23 67.65
21 NS 2P N-2 -200 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 27 79.41
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 3P E = -140 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 3S N+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 31,27 %
Total : 559,9 / 918 = 60,99 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole
a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis : 40,32 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 22 64.71
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 5K E+1 -620 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne : 55,89 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 33 97.06
5 NS 3T W-1 50 9 26.47
6 NS 3S N+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena : 51,64 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 32.35
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 12 35.29
9 NS 4C E = -620 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise : 59,03 %10 NS 2P W-1 100 23 67.65
11 NS 1S W+4 -210 24 70.59
12 NS 3S S+4 720 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 74,51 %
a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine : 49,36 %13 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 32.35
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 44.12
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne : 49,95 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 24 70.59
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 20.59
18 NS 4P E-1 50 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne : 35,31 %19 NS 3C W+2 -200 18 52.94
20 NS 2P N+1 140 14 41.18
21 NS 2P N+1 140 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine : 56,54 %22 NS 3P E = -140 7 20.59
23 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 8.82
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 53,57 %28 NS 4C S-2 -200 3.2 9.41
29 NS 3S S+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 19,80 %
Total : 424,2 / 918 = 46,21 %
PAIRE Nr : B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 % 1 NS 3T E-3 150 28 82.35
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 5PcS-3 -500 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
5 NS 2P S+2 170 32 94.12
6 NS 6P N = 980 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 32.35
8 NS 5TcN-2 -300 1 2.94
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 %10 NS 2P W-1 100 23 67.65
11 NS 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 NS 3S S+4 720 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 %13 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 2.94
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 21,57 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 %16 NS 3S S = 400 11 32.35
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 38.24
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 %19 NS 4C W = -620 8 23.53
20 NS 2P N+2 170 23 67.65
21 NS 3P N-1 -100 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 %22 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
23 NS 3S N = 600 14 41.18
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 15,69 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 27 79.41
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4P E = -420 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
Total : 409,0 / 918 = 44,55 %
PAIRE Nr : B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 % 4 NS 1S N = 90 30 88.24
5 NS 3P S = 140 22 64.71
6 NS 3S S+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 % 7 NS 1KcE-1 200 34 100.00
8 NS 4P N-4 -200 4 11.76
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 %10 NS 4C E-2 200 27 79.41
11 NS 3S W-1 50 31 91.18
12 NS 3S S+1 630 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 %13 NS 3P E = -140 18 52.94
14 NS 3S S+1 430 23 67.65
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 24 70.59
17 NS 1P W+4 -200 26 76.47
18 NS 4P E-1 50 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 %19 NS 4C W = -620 8 23.53
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 14.71
21 NS 3S W-2 100 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 %22 NS 2P E = -110 16 47.06
23 NS 3S S+1 630 25 73.53
24 NS 4C E = -420 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4P E = -420 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 %28 NS 5P N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 3S S+3 690 30 88.24
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 64,61 %
Total : 527,9 / 918 = 57,51 %
PAIRE Nr : B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 14.71
2 NS 2P N-2 -200 6 17.65
3 NS 5C E+1 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 21,57 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 25 73.53
8 NS 5TcN-2 -300 1 2.94
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 %10 NS 3S W-3 300 31 91.18
11 NS 2C N-3 -150 26 76.47
12 NS 3S S+3 690 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 28 82.35
14 NS 3S S+2 460 33 97.06
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 80,39 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 %16 NS 2S S+2 180 4 11.76
17 NS 3S E-2 100 32 94.12
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 27 79.41
20 NS 2P N+2 170 23 67.65
21 NS 3C N = 140 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 79,41 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 20.59
23 NS 3S S+1 630 25 73.53
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 3S N+2 660 32 94.12
27 NS 4PcE = -590 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 %28 NS 6P N-2 -200 3.2 9.41
29 NS 3S S+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 19,80 %
Total : 454,2 / 918 = 49,48 %
PAIRE Nr : B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 % 1 NS 2P N+1 140 22 64.71
2 NS 2P N = 110 31 91.18
3 NS 5K E+2 -640 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 17.65
5 NS 2P S+1 140 22 64.71
6 NS 3S S+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 %10 NS 2K S = 90 20 58.82
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 23.53
12 NS 3S S+4 720 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 55,88 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 %13 NS 4P E = -620 5 14.71
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 23.53
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 18,63 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 %16 NS 3S S = 400 11 32.35
17 NS 3S E-2 100 32 94.12
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 %19 NS 4C W = -620 8 23.53
20 NS 2P N+1 140 14 41.18
21 NS 3K E = -110 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 26 76.47
23 NS 3S S+1 630 25 73.53
24 NS 4C E = -420 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 27 79.41
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4P W = -420 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 3S N+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 31,27 %
Total : 430,9 / 918 = 46,94 %
PAIRE Nr : B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 % 1 NS 2P N = 110 15 44.12
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 3K E+3 -170 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 % 4 NS 2K W+1 -110 19 55.88
5 NS 2C S+1 140 22 64.71
6 NS 6S N-1 -50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 32.35
8 NS 3S S = 400 27 79.41
9 NS 3C E = -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 28 82.35
14 NS 3C N+2 200 4 11.76
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 24 70.59
17 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 5.88
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 %19 NS 4C W-2 200 30 88.24
20 NS 2S N = 120 10 29.41
21 NS 4K E-1 50 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 26 76.47
23 NS 6K N = 1370 34 100.00
24 NS 4C E-3 150 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,16 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 22 64.71
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4P W-2 100 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 %28 NS 3S N = 600 26.5 77.94
29 NS 3S S+2 660 11 32.35
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 57,35 %
Total : 513,5 / 918 = 55,94 %
PAIRE Nr : B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 % 1 NS 2P S = 110 15 44.12
2 NS 2P S-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 4P S-2 -100 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 % 4 NS 1C W+2 -140 6 17.65
5 NS 3T W-1 50 9 26.47
6 NS 6S N-1 -50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 32.35
8 NS 3S S = 400 27 79.41
9 NS 4P E-2 200 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 %10 NS 2K N-1 -100 10 29.41
11 NS 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 NS 3S S+4 720 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 24 70.59
17 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 5.88
18 NS 3K S = 110 26 76.47 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 %19 NS 3S E-4 400 34 100.00
20 NS 2S S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 %22 NS 3K S-1 -50 21 61.76
23 NS 3S N+1 630 25 73.53
24 NS 4C E = -420 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4CcS-2 -300 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 4C N+2 680 23 67.65
30 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 43,04 %
Total : 447,9 / 918 = 48,79 %
PAIRE Nr : B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 % 1 NS 3T E-2 100 10 29.41
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 5P S-3 -150 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 33 97.06
5 NS 2P S = 110 13 38.24
6 NS 3S S+2 460 16 47.06 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 % 7 NS 1S S+3 180 32 94.12
8 NS 3T N = 110 16 47.06
9 NS 3C E = -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 %10 NS 3K S-1 -100 10 29.41
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 8.82
12 NS 3S S+3 690 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 %13 NS 2S W = -120 21 61.76
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 44.12
15 NS 3S E-1 50 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 %19 NS 4C W = -620 8 23.53
20 NS 2P N+2 170 23 67.65
21 NS 2P N+1 140 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 %22 NS 3K S = 110 31 91.18
23 NS 6K N-1 -100 8 23.53
24 NS 4C E-1 50 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 5CcS-2 -300 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 %28 NS 4P N = 620 30.8 90.59
29 NS 6S S = 1440 34 100.00
30 NS 1S W+2 -150 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 77,25 %
Total : 542,8 / 918 = 59,13 %
PAIRE Nr : B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 % 1 NS 2P N+2 170 32 94.12
2 NS 3PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 % 4 NS 1C W+2 -140 6 17.65
5 NS 2P S+2 170 32 94.12
6 NS 6P N = 980 29 85.29 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 25 73.53
8 NS 3S S+1 430 32 94.12
9 NS 4C E = -620 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 %10 NS 3T W-2 200 27 79.41
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 23.53
12 NS 3S S+1 630 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 %13 NS 2S W-1 100 28 82.35
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 44.12
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 %16 NS 3S S = 400 11 32.35
17 NS 3S W = -400 22 64.71
18 NS 4C E-4 200 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 %22 NS 2K S+1 110 31 91.18
23 NS 3S S+1 630 25 73.53
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 %25 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 8.82
26 NS 3S S+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 4P E = -420 12 35.29 µ Tbl = 29,41 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 %28 NS 4P S = 620 30.8 90.59
29 NS 3S S+3 690 30 88.24
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 80,20 %
Total : 521,8 / 918 = 56,84 %
PAIRE Nr : B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 % 1 NS 1P S+1 110 15 44.12
2 NS 2P S-1 -100 16 47.06
3 NS 6C W = -1430 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 19 55.88
5 NS 2P S+1 140 22 64.71
6 NS 6S N = 990 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 72,55 %
b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle : 59,35 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 25 73.53
8 NS 3S S = 400 27 79.41
9 NS 4C E = -620 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 %10 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
11 NS 2KcS-4 -800 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 8,82 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 28 82.35
14 NS 4C N = 420 15 44.12
15 NS 3S E = -400 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 %16 NS 3S S = 400 11 32.35
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 38.24
18 NS 4P E-2 100 24 70.59 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 %19 NS 3S E = -600 15 44.12
20 NS 2P N+1 140 14 41.18
21 NS 2P N+1 140 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 %25 NS 3S W+2 -660 13 38.24
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 44.12
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 %28 NS 6P N-1 -100 14.9 43.82
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 2P W+1 -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 35,20 %
Total : 413,9 / 918 = 45,09 %
PAIRE Nr : B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette
b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon : 53,10 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 14.71
2 NS 2P N = 110 31 91.18
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle : 43,91 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 19 55.88
5 NS 2S N-4 -400 0 0.00
6 NS 6S N-1 -50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 20,59 %
b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 62,76 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 1 2.94
8 NS 5T N-2 -100 7 20.59
9 NS 4C E-1 100 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine : 42,29 %10 NS 1S W = -90 17 50.00
11 NS 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 9 26.47 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique : 51,11 %13 NS 2P E+2 -170 11 32.35
14 NS 3S S+1 430 23 67.65
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan : 57,31 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 33 97.06
17 NS 3S E = -400 22 64.71
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 20.59 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise : 37,27 %19 NS 6C W-3 300 32 94.12
20 NS 2P N+2 170 23 67.65
21 NS 3K E+2 -150 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine : 41,39 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 26 76.47
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 8 23.53
24 NS 4C E-1 50 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric : 39,59 %28 NS 60%60% Ajust 20.4 60.00
29 NS 4C N+2 680 23 67.65
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 73,92 %
Total : 444,4 / 918 = 48,41 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 VERCRUYSSE Marc -FENEAU Jeannine
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 % 1 EO 4P N-3 -150 34 100.00
2 EO 4P S-3 -300 31 91.18
3 EO 5C E+1 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 86,27 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 % 4 EO 1P E+2 -140 28 82.35
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 29 85.29
6 EO 3S N+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 73,53 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 33 97.06
8 EO 3S N = 400 7 20.59
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 %10 EO 2K S-1 -100 24 70.59
11 EO 3S W-1 50 3 8.82
12 EO 3S N+3 690 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 %13 EO 3P E+2 -200 26 76.47
14 EO 4C N = 420 19 55.88
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 71,57 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 10 29.41
17 EO 3S E = -400 12 35.29
18 EO 4K N = 130 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 %19 EO 4C W-1 100 7 20.59
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 29 85.29
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 %22 EO 3P E = -140 27 79.41
23 EO 4C S-2 -200 31 91.18
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 20.59
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
Total : 519,0 / 918 = 56,54 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 PETIT Micheline -SCHOENAERS Lucienne
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 15 44.12
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 32 94.12
6 EO 3S N+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 63,73 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 % 7 EO 3P N+1 170 9 26.47
8 EO 2PcW-2 300 12 35.29
9 EO 4C E-2 200 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 21,57 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 %10 EO 3K S-1 -100 24 70.59
11 EO 3S W-1 50 3 8.82
12 EO 3S S+2 660 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 %13 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 4C N+1 450 6 17.65
15 EO 2S E+3 -210 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 9,80 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 10 29.41
17 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 17.65
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 %19 EO 3C W+2 -200 16 47.06
20 EO 2P N+1 140 20 58.82
21 EO 2P N+1 140 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 %22 EO 3P E-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3S S+1 630 9 26.47
24 EO 3S E = -400 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 19,61 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 %25 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4PcE = -590 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 3S S+3 690 4 11.76
30 EO 2P W = -110 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 27,55 %
Total : 324,1 / 918 = 35,31 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 DEFALQUE Brigide -CLEANIS Evelyne
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 % 1 EO 3T E-3 150 6 17.65
2 EO 1P N = 80 8 23.53
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 23 67.65
8 EO 2S N-2 -100 27 79.41
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 %10 EO 3T E-4 400 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 17 50.00
12 EO 3S N+4 720 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 21,57 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 %13 EO 4P E+1 -650 33 97.06
14 EO 4C N+1 450 6 17.65
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 10 29.41
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 27 79.41
18 EO 4P E-1 50 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 %19 EO 4C W = -620 26 76.47
20 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
21 EO 3K E = -110 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 %22 EO 3K S-1 -50 13 38.24
23 EO 5K S-1 -100 26 76.47
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 %25 EO 3S W+3 -690 31 91.18
26 EO 3S S+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4P E = -420 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 %28 EO 3S S = 600 7.5 22.06
29 EO 3S N+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 42,65 %
Total : 458,5 / 918 = 49,95 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 BERNARDI Santina -TIFFOUS Nouredine
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 % 1 EO 2S S+1 150 6 17.65
2 EO 3P N-3 -300 31 91.18
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 15 44.12
5 EO 3P S-1 -100 29 85.29
6 EO 3S N+3 490 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 %10 EO 2T W = -90 17 50.00
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 31 91.18
12 EO 3S S+4 720 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 %13 EO 3P E+1 -170 23 67.65
14 EO 4C N = 420 19 55.88
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 %16 EO 3S S = 400 23 67.65
17 EO 3S W-2 100 2 5.88
18 EO 3KcS+1 870 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 33 97.06
20 EO 3S N = 600 3 8.82
21 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 %22 EO 2P E = -110 18 52.94
23 EO 3S N = 600 20 58.82
24 EO 3S E = -400 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 5.88
27 EO 4P W = -420 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 %28 EO 4C S-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 3S S+1 630 32 94.12
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 62,84 %
Total : 453,1 / 918 = 49,36 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 NAPOLI Daniela -ZENS Martine
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 29 85.29
2 EO 3K E-2 100 6 17.65
3 EO 5C W+1 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 28 82.35
5 EO 2P S = 110 21 61.76
6 EO 6S S = 990 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 23 67.65
8 EO 2S N+1 150 15 44.12
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 6 17.65
14 EO 4C N = 420 19 55.88
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 %16 EO 3T S+1 130 34 100.00
17 EO 4P W+2 -480 32 94.12
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 91,18 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 %19 EO 4C W+1 -650 33 97.06
20 EO 2P S+2 170 11 32.35
21 EO 3K E = -110 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 79.41
23 EO 6S S-4 -400 34 100.00
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 91,18 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 4T S-1 -100 34 100.00
27 EO 4CcS-1 -100 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 4C N+2 680 11 32.35
30 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,51 %
Total : 557,1 / 918 = 60,69 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 NEVE Albert -NEVE Françoise
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 29 85.29
2 EO 2P S-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 % 4 EO 1C E = -80 6 17.65
5 EO 2P N+1 140 12 35.29
6 EO 3S N+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 9 26.47
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 22 64.71
9 EO 4C E = -620 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 %10 EO 2P W-1 100 11 32.35
11 EO 1S W+4 -210 10 29.41
12 EO 3S S+4 720 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 25,49 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 10 29.41
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 21 61.76
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 %19 EO 2C W+2 -170 13 38.24
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 29 85.29
21 EO 4K E = -130 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 79.41
23 EO 3S S = 600 20 58.82
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 %25 EO 3S E+4 -720 34 100.00
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4P E = -420 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 73,53 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 %28 EO 3S S-3 -300 33.9 99.71
29 EO 3S S+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 3P W+1 -170 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 83,24 %
Total : 541,9 / 918 = 59,03 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 GUISSET Berthe -DIMAS Marilena
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 3C E+3 -230 6 17.65 µ Tbl = 23,53 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 15 44.12
5 EO 2P S+2 170 2 5.88
6 EO 3S N+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 23 67.65
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 22 64.71
9 EO 4C E = -620 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 %10 EO 3K S-1 -100 24 70.59
11 EO 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 EO 5K N = 600 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 71,57 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 %13 EO 4P E = -620 29 85.29
14 EO 2K E-3 150 32 94.12
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 87,25 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 %19 EO 3C W = -140 10 29.41
20 EO 3S S = 600 3 8.82
21 EO 3K E+1 -130 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 79.41
23 EO 4C S = 620 16 47.06
24 EO 4C E-1 50 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 %25 EO 3S W = -600 2 5.88
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4CcS-1 -100 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 25,49 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 3S S+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 68,73 %
Total : 474,1 / 918 = 51,64 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 HIROUX Pierre -STELLIAN Lucienne
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 % 1 EO 3P N = 140 12 35.29
2 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
3 EO 5K E+2 -640 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 1 2.94
5 EO 3T W-1 50 25 73.53
6 EO 3S N+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 23 67.65
8 EO 3P W-3 150 15 44.12
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 48,04 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 %10 EO 2P W = -110 31 91.18
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 26 76.47
12 EO 3S S+1 630 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 80,39 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 %13 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 55.88
14 EO 2S S+3 210 28 82.35
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 73,53 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 %16 EO 2S S+1 150 32 94.12
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 27 79.41
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 75,49 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 %22 EO 2P E = -110 18 52.94
23 EO 6K N-2 -200 31 91.18
24 EO 3S E = -400 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 58,82 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 3S N+2 660 2 5.88
27 EO 4T W = -130 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 3S N+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 2P E+2 -170 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 68,73 %
Total : 513,1 / 918 = 55,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 MASTERSON Peter -MASTERSON Mavis
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 12 35.29
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 5K E+1 -620 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 8 23.53
5 EO 2P S+1 140 12 35.29
6 EO 3S S = 400 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 9 26.47
8 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 %10 EO 2S W-3 300 3 8.82
11 EO 3S W-1 50 3 8.82
12 EO 3K N+2 150 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 %13 EO 2S W+1 -150 19 55.88
14 EO 3S N+2 460 1 2.94
15 EO 2S E+1 -150 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 21,57 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 %16 EO 3S S = 400 23 67.65
17 EO 4P W = -420 16 47.06
18 EO 5P E-1 50 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 %19 EO 2C W+2 -170 13 38.24
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 29 85.29
21 EO 3P N-2 -200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 71,57 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 20.59
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 3P E = -140 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 35,29 %
A.5 CHABOTIER Jean -MASSINON Henri : 68,29 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 0.1 0.29
29 EO 4C N+2 680 11 32.35
30 EO 2P W = -110 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 15,78 %
Total : 370,1 / 918 = 40,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 COULIE Joëlle -de WASSEIGE Charlotte
A.6 VANDERSTRAETEN Maurice -WINNIFRED Morris : 44,32 % 1 EO 2P N = 110 19 55.88
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 6C W = -1430 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
A.1 VELGE Brigitte -WALTON Marilène : 33,88 % 4 EO 1S E+1 -120 22 64.71
5 EO 3P N = 140 12 35.29
6 EO 4S N+1 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
A.7 PAQUOT Guy -t'SERSTEVENS Brigitte : 44,22 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 23 67.65
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 64.71
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
A.2 KENGEN Barbara -JOURDAIN Frédéric : 41,56 %10 EO 2C E = -110 31 91.18
11 EO 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 71,57 %
A.8 van de WERVE Gaëtan -JOURDAIN Antoinette : 53,28 %13 EO 2S W = -120 13 38.24
14 EO 4C N+1 450 6 17.65
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
A.3 VACANI Patrizia -ZANDORA Claudia : 46,61 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 1 2.94
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 21 61.76
18 EO 3C W-3 150 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 25,49 %
A.9 BELET Francine -PODEVYN Jacques : 60,99 %19 EO 5K E = -600 19 55.88
20 EO 2P N+2 170 11 32.35
21 EO 2P N-2 -200 31 91.18 µ Tbl = 59,80 %
A.4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -HENRICOT Danielle : 48,36 %22 EO 3P E = -140 27 79.41
23 EO 3S S+2 660 2 5.88
24 EO 3S E = -400 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
A10 de FABRIBECKERS Eddy -de FABRIBECKERS Nicole : 46,21 %28 EO 4C S-2 -200 30.8 90.59
29 EO 3S S+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 80,20 %
Total : 491,8 / 918 = 53,57 %
PAIRE Nr : b.1 FAUP Danielle -GOLDMAN Madeleine
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 % 1 EO 3T E-3 150 6 17.65
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 5PcS-3 -500 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 1 2.94
5 EO 2P S = 110 21 61.76
6 EO 3S S+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 % 7 EO 1KcE-1 200 0 0.00
8 EO 4P N-4 -200 30 88.24
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 %10 EO 3T W-2 200 7 20.59
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 26 76.47
12 EO 3S S+1 630 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 6 17.65
14 EO 3S S+2 460 1 2.94
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 19,61 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 %16 EO 3S S = 400 23 67.65
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 21 61.76
18 EO 4P E-2 100 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 52,94 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 %19 EO 4C W = -620 26 76.47
20 EO 2P N+1 140 20 58.82
21 EO 3K E = -110 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 64,71 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 8 23.53
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 26 76.47
24 EO 4C E-1 50 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 35.29
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
Total : 380,0 / 918 = 41,39 %
PAIRE Nr : b.2 STEININGER Clarence -STEININGER Maie-Françoise
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 % 4 EO 1S N = 90 4 11.76
5 EO 3P S = 140 12 35.29
6 EO 3S S+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 9 26.47
8 EO 3S S+1 430 2 5.88
9 EO 4C E = -620 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 %10 EO 3S W-3 300 3 8.82
11 EO 2C N-3 -150 8 23.53
12 EO 3S S+3 690 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 24,51 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 6 17.65
14 EO 4C N = 420 19 55.88
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 %16 EO 3S S = 400 23 67.65
17 EO 3S E-2 100 2 5.88
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 50,98 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 %19 EO 6C W-3 300 2 5.88
20 EO 2P N+2 170 11 32.35
21 EO 3K E+2 -150 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 8 23.53
23 EO 6K N = 1370 0 0.00
24 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,84 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 20.59
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4P E = -420 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 4C N+2 680 11 32.35
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 56,96 %
Total : 342,1 / 918 = 37,27 %
PAIRE Nr : b.3 WAJNBERG Tania -GEORGES Ivan
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 % 1 EO 3T E-2 100 24 70.59
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 5P S-3 -150 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 43,14 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 9 26.47
8 EO 5TcN-2 -300 33 97.06
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 %10 EO 2C E+1 -140 34 100.00
11 EO 2KcS-4 -800 34 100.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 91,18 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 %13 EO 4P E = -620 29 85.29
14 EO 3S S = 400 26 76.47
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 81,37 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 1 2.94
17 EO 3S E = -400 12 35.29
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 %19 EO 4C W-2 200 4 11.76
20 EO 2S N = 120 24 70.59
21 EO 4K E-1 50 10 29.41 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 %22 EO 2P E+2 -170 34 100.00
23 EO 3S N = 600 20 58.82
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 84,31 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4CcS-2 -300 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 %28 EO 5P N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 3S S+3 690 4 11.76
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 35,39 %
Total : 526,1 / 918 = 57,31 %
PAIRE Nr : b.4 HEMES Jeannine -JACQUET Monique
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 29 85.29
2 EO 2P N-2 -200 28 82.35
3 EO 5C E+1 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 78,43 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 % 4 EO 1C W+2 -140 28 82.35
5 EO 2P S+2 170 2 5.88
6 EO 6P N = 980 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 %10 EO 2K S = 90 14 41.18
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 26 76.47
12 EO 3S S+4 720 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 44,12 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 %13 EO 2P E+2 -170 23 67.65
14 EO 3S S+1 430 11 32.35
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 10 29.41
17 EO 4P W+2 -480 32 94.12
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 %19 EO 4C W = -620 26 76.47
20 EO 2P N+2 170 11 32.35
21 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 %22 EO 3K S-1 -50 13 38.24
23 EO 3S N+1 630 9 26.47
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4P E = -420 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 %28 EO 4P N = 620 3.2 9.41
29 EO 6S S = 1440 0 0.00
30 EO 1S W+2 -150 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 22,75 %
Total : 469,2 / 918 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : b.5 COLINET Eric -PASTEELS Isabelle
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 % 1 EO 2P N+2 170 2 5.88
2 EO 3PcN-3 -800 34 100.00
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 28 82.35
5 EO 2P S+1 140 12 35.29
6 EO 3S S+2 460 18 52.94 µ Tbl = 56,86 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 9 26.47
8 EO 3S S = 400 7 20.59
9 EO 4C E = -620 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 42,16 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 6 17.65
14 EO 3C N+2 200 30 88.24
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 62,75 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 %16 EO 3S S = 400 23 67.65
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 21 61.76
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 %19 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00
20 EO 2S S-2 -200 34 100.00
21 EO 3S W = -400 34 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 %22 EO 2P E = -110 18 52.94
23 EO 3S S+1 630 9 26.47
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 46,08 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 5CcS-2 -300 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 51,96 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 %28 EO 6P N-2 -200 30.8 90.59
29 EO 3S S+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 80,20 %
Total : 544,8 / 918 = 59,35 %
PAIRE Nr : b.6 DOZIN Francine -SIMONET Martine
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 % 1 EO 2P N+1 140 12 35.29
2 EO 2P N = 110 3 8.82
3 EO 5K E+2 -640 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 15 44.12
5 EO 2P S+1 140 12 35.29
6 EO 6S N = 990 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 27,45 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 23 67.65
8 EO 3S S = 400 7 20.59
9 EO 3C E = -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 %10 EO 1S W = -90 17 50.00
11 EO 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 10 29.41
17 EO 4P W+2 -480 32 94.12
18 EO 3K S = 110 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 49,02 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 %19 EO 4C W = -620 26 76.47
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 29 85.29
21 EO 3S W-2 100 8 23.53 µ Tbl = 61,76 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 %22 EO 3K S = 110 3 8.82
23 EO 6K N-1 -100 26 76.47
24 EO 4C E-1 50 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 3S N+2 660 2 5.88
27 EO 4PcE = -590 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 54,90 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 %28 EO 4P S = 620 3.2 9.41
29 EO 3S S+3 690 4 11.76
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 19,80 %
Total : 388,2 / 918 = 42,29 %
PAIRE Nr : b.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 % 1 EO 1P S+1 110 19 55.88
2 EO 2P S-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 6C W = -1430 33 97.06 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 % 4 EO 2K W+1 -110 15 44.12
5 EO 2C S+1 140 12 35.29
6 EO 6S N-1 -50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 33 97.06
8 EO 5T N-2 -100 27 79.41
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 69,61 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 %10 EO 2K N-1 -100 24 70.59
11 EO 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 EO 3S S+4 720 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 45,10 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 %13 EO 4P W+1 -650 33 97.06
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 34 100.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 78,43 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 %19 EO 4C W = -620 26 76.47
20 EO 2P N+2 170 11 32.35
21 EO 2P N+1 140 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 27 79.41
23 EO 3S S+1 630 9 26.47
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 %25 EO 3S W+3 -690 31 91.18
26 EO 3S S+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4P E = -420 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 70,59 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 3S N+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 2P W+2 -170 28 82.35 µ Tbl = 68,73 %
Total : 576,1 / 918 = 62,76 %
PAIRE Nr : b.8 MEUR Xavier -BAUSIER Michelle
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 % 1 EO 2P N = 110 19 55.88
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 3K E+3 -170 4 11.76 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 15 44.12
5 EO 2S N-4 -400 34 100.00
6 EO 6S N-1 -50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 79,41 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 23 67.65
8 EO 3S S = 400 7 20.59
9 EO 4P E-2 200 1 2.94 µ Tbl = 30,39 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 %10 EO 2P W-1 100 11 32.35
11 EO 3S W = -400 17 50.00
12 EO 3S S+4 720 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 32,35 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 %13 EO 2S W = -120 13 38.24
14 EO 4C N = 420 19 55.88
15 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 10 29.41
17 EO 1P W+4 -200 8 23.53
18 EO 4P E-1 50 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 31,37 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 %22 EO 2K S+1 110 3 8.82
23 EO 3S S+1 630 9 26.47
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 38,24 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 20.59
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 4P W = -420 22 64.71 µ Tbl = 47,06 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 %28 EO 6P N-1 -100 19.1 56.18
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 34 100.00
30 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 64,80 %
Total : 403,1 / 918 = 43,91 %
PAIRE Nr : b.9 VERBRUGGE Nicole -BASTIN Yvon
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 29 85.29
2 EO 2P N = 110 3 8.82
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 23 67.65 µ Tbl = 53,92 %
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 % 4 EO 1C W+2 -140 28 82.35
5 EO 3T W-1 50 25 73.53
6 EO 6S N-1 -50 32 94.12 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 23 67.65
8 EO 5TcN-2 -300 33 97.06
9 EO 4C E-1 100 11 32.35 µ Tbl = 65,69 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 %10 EO 3K S-1 -100 24 70.59
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 31 91.18
12 EO 3S S+3 690 14 41.18 µ Tbl = 67,65 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 %13 EO 3P E = -140 16 47.06
14 EO 3S S+1 430 11 32.35
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 %16 EO 3S S = 400 23 67.65
17 EO 3S W = -400 12 35.29
18 EO 4C E-4 200 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 7 20.59
20 EO 2P N+2 170 11 32.35
21 EO 3C N = 140 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 20,59 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 %25 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 61.76
26 EO 3S N+1 630 19 55.88
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 30 88.24 µ Tbl = 68,63 %
B.5 GLEVICZKY André -DEJARDIN Drs : 55,94 %28 EO 3S N = 600 7.5 22.06
29 EO 3S S+2 660 23 67.65
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 42,65 %
Total : 487,5 / 918 = 53,10 %
PAIRE Nr : b10 DELWAIDE Henry -DEGRAVE Frédéric
B.6 NEUENSCHWANDER Grazia -VERHULST Michèle : 48,79 % 1 EO 2P S = 110 19 55.88
2 EO 2P S-1 -100 18 52.94
3 EO 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
B.1 van der GRACHT Philippe -de BERGEYCK Marie Christi : 44,55 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 34 100.00
5 EO 2P S+2 170 2 5.88
6 EO 6P N = 980 5 14.71 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.7 ROY Philippe -MANISE Dominique : 59,13 % 7 EO 1S S+3 180 2 5.88
8 EO 3T N = 110 18 52.94
9 EO 3C E = -140 21 61.76 µ Tbl = 40,20 %
B.2 QUIEVY Bruno -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 57,51 %10 EO 4C E-2 200 7 20.59
11 EO 3S W-1 50 3 8.82
12 EO 3S S+1 630 25 73.53 µ Tbl = 34,31 %
B.8 GROSFILS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 56,84 %13 EO 2S W-1 100 6 17.65
14 EO 4C N = 420 19 55.88
15 EO 3S E = -400 13 38.24 µ Tbl = 37,25 %
B.3 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 49,48 %16 EO 2S S+2 180 30 88.24
17 EO 3S E-2 100 2 5.88
18 EO 4P E = -420 27 79.41 µ Tbl = 57,84 %
B.9 URBIN CHOFFRAY Thérèse -COGNEAU Jacques : 45,09 %19 EO 3S E = -600 19 55.88
20 EO 2P N+1 140 20 58.82
21 EO 2P N+1 140 3 8.82 µ Tbl = 41,18 %
B.4 TURIN Françoise -PASSOT Jean-François : 46,94 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 8 23.53
23 EO 3S S+1 630 9 26.47
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 58.82 µ Tbl = 36,27 %
B10 DEGRAVE Odile -DELWAIDE Bernadette : 48,41 %28 EO 60%60% Ajust 20.4 60.00
29 EO 4C N+2 680 11 32.35
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 2 5.88 µ Tbl = 32,75 %
Total : 363,4 / 918 = 39,59 %
|
|